MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > GENERAL WW2 TOPICS > WW2 Military History & Equipment

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 26-02-23, 04:11
Lang Lang is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Brisbane Australia
Posts: 1,672
Default

B24 vs B17 Production

Lots of pro's and cons. The B-24 carried more and flew considerably faster and further than a B-17. The B-17 was an easier aircraft to fly with its fat old fashioned Clark wing and much more room for the crew (except tail gunner where B-24 won out). The B-24 with its high-speed laminar-flow wing, like the P-51 Mustang, was often constrained in Europe by having to slow down to B-17 speed to enable mass formation operations. The B-24 found its role in the Pacific and SE Asia where its long range and ability to fly more safely at lower more comfortable levels produced first class results. Opinion still rages and after 80 years none of the opinion makers has ever flown a B-17 or B-24 and many of them have never seen one in the flesh
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Screenshot (401).jpg (98.3 KB, 1 views)
File Type: jpg Screenshot (400).jpg (100.1 KB, 0 views)

Last edited by Lang; 26-02-23 at 04:25.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to misunderstand a knock on the door. maple_leaf_eh The Sergeants' Mess 1 18-07-15 20:43
Knock me down with a feather, M43 under my nose Robin Craig Post-war Military Vehicles 15 10-02-14 01:51


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 05:47.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016