MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Carrier Forum

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 29-03-11, 09:46
shaun shaun is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: uk
Posts: 528
Default genuine or repro ??? That is the question !

As an engineer and a restorer of military vehicles since 1981 I am fully in favor of repro parts to complete a project (infact i have just made the top Armour that was missing from my current project). And yes engines, transmissions, running grear all get changed while in service. But in all my years in the Road Transport industry, Military and now the museum world the chassis or Hull (lower hull in carriers) has always been "the Vehicle". If you make a new chassis that is a different vehicle to the one you are restoring, Reparing the chassis is one thing but replacment ???? After a massive landrover show near Peterbobrough last year the Police and DVLA were stopping landrovers and checking chassis, Vins and components. When they found rebuilt vehicles on old reg numbers (upgraded to coil spring and desiel engines )they were conficated and crushed (any vehicle manufactured before jan 1973 is road tax exempt ). Having a used a few old spares on a new chassis does not make it a 1942 vehicle etc.

The other thing to take into consideration are "Safety critical" parts. Brakes, steering, tracks etc. do the parts that have been "reproduced" or repaired meet the construction and use standards ? This area is such a mine field (no pun intented) as any bad publicty due to a poorly built vehicle, involved in an accident and then inspected by VOSA could end up with our vehicles becming banned from the road.

With todays technolagy it is possible to re-manufacture anything, as has been proved with WW2 Jeeps. But is a "repro" Jeep the same value or interest as one that has seen service and been places ? to me a major part of the value is in the object history, sitting in behind the armour or in the hull of something that was used in 1940 is part of the thought provoking experence.

Why are my views such, there are so many good restores out there rebuilding real vehicles and then there are the few who are in it for the money or the glory.

I realise this will touch a nerve with people, but you either have a real Jeep / carrier etc or a repro.

TTFN
__________________
Shaun Hindle

Morris C8
Ford GPW jeep 1945
Morris 1000 (ex mil)
SAS LSV
Harley Davidson MT 350 motor cycle
Universal carrier MK 1*1943 Ronson (under restoration)
Universal carrier MK 2* 1944 (Puddle Jumper HSK 345)
Ferret MK 1/1 1956
Ferret MK 2/4 1958
CVR(T) Scorpion
432 MK2
Daimler MK1 armoured car 1943
(winner best wheeled armour W&P show 2011)
Daimler Dingo MK2 1944 (awaiting restoration, aquired 11/12/2011)
Fordson WOT 3 D 1940 (awaiting restoration )
Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 05:38.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016