#1
|
|||
|
|||
Armoured Vehicle Road Wheels
Can anyone with experience in cold climates with tanks or APCs comment on what effect the cold weather has on destroying the bond between the rubber which is attached to the actual steel wheel. Does extreme cold or freeze and thaw action help split or separate the rubber off a sherman, M113 etc roadwheel ? B.P.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I don't know if the cold damages the bond but I guarantee that once a small void forms between the track and pad, moisture will penetrate and the freeze-thaw cycles will expand the gap, possibly leading to total separation of track and pad. The power of a little bit of water expanding as it turns to ice is amazing.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
In operation, it seemed like it was heat that caused the separation. We used to drive carriers all the time from Winnipeg to Shilo in the fall and winter. Lots of roadwheel rubber on the highways in those days.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
more...
I guess I wonder if the different rate of expansion between steel wheel and rubber when they are subjected to heat or cold start the process of separating the rubber off the steel. The comment about heat contributing to this separation is really the opposite side of the freeze/thaw situation. Does it harm these wheels to sit outside in extreme cold weather??? BP
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
We have a small half pallet of roadwheels in the storage shed at work. They will see -35 or worse in the winter. I don't expect any degredation of them, but then again ask me in 20 years.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
On the Hagglunds BV206 roadwheels at work the rubber chips at very low temperatures during operation.
We are going to try a company called Polymark in Ontario to rebuild ours in polurethane. I am very leery of how this is going to work having been burned by another company before. Polymark understand our concerns and will be doing a first off before we commit to any quantity, this is how we should have gone before. We have proven the polyurethane is a more durable product after testing one done by a friend.
__________________
Robin Craig Home of the Maple Leaf Adapter 2 Canadian Mk1 Ferrets Kawasaki KLR250 CFR 95-10908 ex PPCLI Canadair CL70 CFR 58-91588 Armstrong MT500 serial CFR 86-78530 Two Canam 250s Land Rover S3 Commanders Caravan Carawagon 16 GN 07 Trailer Cargo 3/4 T 2WHD 38 GJ 62 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Replace rubber with plastic?
www.safetechnology.com/downloads.asp?fid=35652
Here is a nice article of how and why synthetic rubber components on tracks (and road wheels) fatigue over time and use. It has nothing to do with different coefficients of thermal expansion. This article explains the failure mechanism and how cracks form. Rubber is selected for a good engineering reason and if substitution with plastic (such as polyurethane) were a viable option it would be in common use, and it is not. As the plastic is stressed beyond its design parameters it will shear. We tried many different rubber compounds on the Leopard to try and extend the life of these components and polyurethanes were deemed not suitable. Proceed with caution. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Rob
It comes down to purely the quality of the material used. If it is British or German or US sourced rubber or synthetic then basically it is rubbish. You would be familiar with the GI saying "your weapon is made by the cheapest supplier". Thus it is with road wheel rubber and pads. British rubber especially is bad. I have seen a CVRT shed 1/2 a road wheel tyre due to nothing more than heat build up - technically = hysteresis. The Aussie army got well and truly fed up with the rubbish they were being sold and went to locally sourced quality product, yep, it cost. But that was the end of the short life issues. By the way, for those that think synthetics are the way to go, especially polyurethane, you are in for a surprise. Maybe in Canada at -35deg they may work. But any synthetic will respond much quicker to hysteresis and fail much quicker than traditional materials. Looks excellent in a museum display vehicle that sits still, a failure on a vehicle that is mobile. Note what 45jim says! Regards Doug
__________________
dgrev@iinet.net.au |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
I appreciate the advice and I enjoyed reading the learned document and grasped what it was all about.
As a civilian we are having issues obtaining NOS road wheels. The original rubber could have been as old as 1985 and is well past it's best before date. We have to re-cover the road wheels and not using rubber seems for our amount of use and or abuse to be a value option. The Bv206 track is designed to flex and twist and has more than one contact point. Once the moulded edge of the road wheel breaks down and the steel guide horns of the track make contact with the aluminum wears very fast. I have a few pictures to put up in a minute. We were royally shafted by a major company in Winnerpeg who did the rubber re-life a few years ago and despite having an NOS example as a pattern part to follow decided for ease of manufacture to machine the edge off and leave no side protection. We were forced to pay up front and despite all kinds of efforts it was felt un-economic ( by higher) to lawyer up and get into a legal fight. We have smarted ever since. This time I am treading very carefully
__________________
Robin Craig Home of the Maple Leaf Adapter 2 Canadian Mk1 Ferrets Kawasaki KLR250 CFR 95-10908 ex PPCLI Canadair CL70 CFR 58-91588 Armstrong MT500 serial CFR 86-78530 Two Canam 250s Land Rover S3 Commanders Caravan Carawagon 16 GN 07 Trailer Cargo 3/4 T 2WHD 38 GJ 62 |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Robin
Your decision. I will say, that the failure mode of synthetics is from the inside out. Likewise bad formulation rubber. So it is not a case of watching to see if rubber is failing. Case of "oh crap, we just shed a pad or tyre, but they all looked perfectly ok 1/2 hour ago". Alternately, you could fabricate "wear disks" which is what the M113s use on the inner face of their road wheels. Makes a huge difference. Regards Doug Quote:
__________________
dgrev@iinet.net.au |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Here are some pictures. Note how the master has a significant bulge to protect the aluminum wheel. This was the portion that was ignored by the last company and the picture shows how they machined the side face of the rubber and left no protection, the bright silver portion shows steel to aluminum wear.
__________________
Robin Craig Home of the Maple Leaf Adapter 2 Canadian Mk1 Ferrets Kawasaki KLR250 CFR 95-10908 ex PPCLI Canadair CL70 CFR 58-91588 Armstrong MT500 serial CFR 86-78530 Two Canam 250s Land Rover S3 Commanders Caravan Carawagon 16 GN 07 Trailer Cargo 3/4 T 2WHD 38 GJ 62 |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Robin
Oh, yuk. I hate the engineering. Those things weren't designed to last. Can't see any easy way to add a wear disk. Given the design, what is usual life before rubber is removed by guide teeth? Sorry. Regards Doug
__________________
dgrev@iinet.net.au |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
I will say that the data provided by 45jim and Doug Greville is very powerful and I will be drawing the polyurethane folks attention to it for comment and warranty.
I enjoy being educated here.
__________________
Robin Craig Home of the Maple Leaf Adapter 2 Canadian Mk1 Ferrets Kawasaki KLR250 CFR 95-10908 ex PPCLI Canadair CL70 CFR 58-91588 Armstrong MT500 serial CFR 86-78530 Two Canam 250s Land Rover S3 Commanders Caravan Carawagon 16 GN 07 Trailer Cargo 3/4 T 2WHD 38 GJ 62 |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Doug,
We have never had a brand new, made last week road wheel, ever. I can tell you that the polyurethane wheel we have been trialing has not chipped in the side wall at all and this was the third winter of use. I will show and report what we experience. Please bear in mind the cost for us is more calculated in dollar per season than dollar per mile. I would suggest we do on average now less than 300 kilometers a year.
__________________
Robin Craig Home of the Maple Leaf Adapter 2 Canadian Mk1 Ferrets Kawasaki KLR250 CFR 95-10908 ex PPCLI Canadair CL70 CFR 58-91588 Armstrong MT500 serial CFR 86-78530 Two Canam 250s Land Rover S3 Commanders Caravan Carawagon 16 GN 07 Trailer Cargo 3/4 T 2WHD 38 GJ 62 |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
Robin
Ok. You may get away with it then. My understanding is that Polyurethane has excellent wear properties and lousy thermal properties. Hysteresis is the enemy immediately any speed or flexing takes place - both generate internal heat. Another way of putting it (to my understanding), is that poly is designed to take slide or direct loads of slow velocity/slow cycling. Not the case if you are hacking your vehicle around at 30 or more kph, doing turns and exerting cyclic forces of many tons (not vehicle weight, but dynamic force - think of it as force x velocity x time - I am not an engineer, so don't know correct calculation). Thus if you have a track weighing say 100kg and it is trundling around at 5kph the forces aren't that much. Thrash it around at 30kph and it becomes an exponential multiplier, you can be talking tons force. I had an engineer give me a gut estimate of the apparent weight of one of my Kettenkrad tracks when doing 50kph. He said roughly 1.5 tonne PER TRACK - er, um, that was sobering. If you are driving your vehicle really slow, say 5 kph maybe 10 kph then this may be the reason you have had no problems. Plus if it is cold (for me, Canada is cold even in summer), would also explain your observations to date as the poly can heat dump sufficiently to stay within its operational parameters. Don't assume that touch test will tell you if things are getting dicey. The internal temperature can be much higher than the external temperature of the rubber. The outside can heat dump, the inside can't. Regards Doug Quote:
__________________
dgrev@iinet.net.au |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Being in the plastics business for some year you gentlemen are going to have a problem convincing me that rubber is better
90 percent of all rubbers are a synthetic of plastic One little note polyurethane is used to replace springs in punch press die and take millions of hits before replacements a natural rubber component would take about 10 hits and disintegrate There is so many plastics out there for many uses and the right one being used makes the difference finish your home work it is in the supplier |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
If polyurethane was better than rubber as a tyre compound the world would have switched to using that years ago. It's all down to the conditions of use.
(Bear in mind that my experience of the tyre industry is completely unrelated to the technical side (I was in Dunlop's computer operations area, but did have acquaintances in Tyre Technical who would have known more than you could possibly need about rubber compounds), but that was 30 years ago.) Polyurethane replaced rubber in lots of places: printing press rollers, casters, and small wheels, cutting mats, and so on. It's suitable for those purposes because the amount of flexing is small (and in the case of a printing press the rollers are cooled by the ink and process fluids). It's not suitable for vehicle (pneumatic) tyres because of the continual (and substantial) flexing that takes place in everyday usage. Dunlop's test fleet ran a variety of vehicles under standard road conditions (with regular stops to check tyre temperatures, etc.) to make sure the compounds used were up to the job. If polyurethane was usable they'd have jumped at it with much rejoicing because it would have saved them a fortune in imported rubber and equivalent substitutes. Solid tyres are a similar case: the rubber is being continually flexed where it's under load (i.e. in contact with the floor or inner face of the track), and that continual flexing raises the temperature of the tyre. PU gets used for things like factory forklift truck wheels because they're usually working indoors, on a smooth surface, and at low speeds. Outdoor forklifts, I think, use rubber tyres, with different tread patterns for added grip but they are still a low speed device. (Unless you talk to my friend who repairs the things after various lunatics have damaged them.) Tracked vehicle road wheels are a high-speed, probably high-loading, and certainly high-flexing application: the ground force of the track may be quite small (because it's a rigid plate), but that's transferred to a much smaller contact surface on the road wheel, and I doubt that polyurethane is up to the task. Chris. (Fort Dunlop is long gone, but it used to be the biggest tyre factory in Europe, and the rifle club had a mix of members from all over the factory and admin, including a few from Tyre Technical (who were the compound and tread pattern development side of things, there were some amusing tales told).) |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Times have changed in 30 years
And in my opinion that your long story would have worked then but not now Do you not think heat is generated in a a 150 ton press running at 60 strokes a minute That is called shear pressure and the material is polyurethane not rubber Again just my opinion |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Road wheels | jeff davis | The Carrier Forum | 1 | 17-07-16 09:37 |
Road Wheels?? | Richard Coutts-Smith | The Armour Forum | 2 | 10-05-12 10:38 |
refurbishing Road Wheels | JTH | The Carrier Forum | 16 | 30-06-09 15:57 |
New Rubber on Road Wheels | Robin Craig | The Armour Forum | 1 | 18-01-06 14:01 |
WTB road wheels | alleramilitaria | The Carrier Forum | 0 | 10-04-05 21:19 |