MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Armour Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 16-07-14, 09:31
Tim Lovelock Tim Lovelock is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Mornington Peninsula Victoria Australia
Posts: 164
Default What tank is this?

I took this pic from a 'History' program on the campaign in North Africa, US troops on the beaches in Tunisia (I think). But I am not familiar with this tank alighting a landing craft.
Attached Thumbnails
image.jpg  
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 16-07-14, 09:53
Hanno Spoelstra's Avatar
Hanno Spoelstra Hanno Spoelstra is offline
MLU Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 14,400
Default

It is Marmon-Herrington CTL-3M light tank. Initially built as the CTL-3 with rubber band track, they were rebuilt in 1941 as CTL-3M for the USMC and delivered in 1942. They were fitted with a vertical volute suspension system and track identical to the M2A4 Light Tank.

For more information see my website: http://www.geocities.ws/marmonherrington/

Also of interest on my site is The 'Marine Tank' of 1936: The Strange Case of the Marmon-Herrington Tank in the US Marine Corps by Kenneth W. Estes

HTH,
Hanno

Click image for larger version

Name:	ctl3m_001.jpg
Views:	6
Size:	22.5 KB
ID:	66426
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 16-07-14, 11:07
Tim Lovelock Tim Lovelock is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Mornington Peninsula Victoria Australia
Posts: 164
Default

Thanks Hanno, the suspension looked familiar as it looks like a common system to a number of tanks. I'd never seen this profile previously and the pic doesn't show it as heavily armed. Thanks for your reply and links. Cheers Tim
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 16-07-14, 19:57
Hanno Spoelstra's Avatar
Hanno Spoelstra Hanno Spoelstra is offline
MLU Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 14,400
Default

Tim,

According to the documentation available, they were equipped with 3 x .30 Cal. MGs. But this seems to have been the idea of the manufacturer, in practice so many MGs in a confined space was not practical.

I think these "tanks" could be classified as the "crawl" phase in "crawl-walk-run". Amazing how much progress was made during the course of WW2.

Hanno
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 17-07-14, 08:20
Tim Lovelock Tim Lovelock is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Mornington Peninsula Victoria Australia
Posts: 164
Default

Hi Hanno, I guess after WW1 it was a steep learning curve, developing tracked vehicles in the hope another war wouldn't come along. It was interesting reading your link and the development of this vehicle by the marines. Weight restrictions etc. but it seems it was really a light tank for infantry support with greater expectations on it than it could provide at the time.
My interest has developed through model making as a kid, I guess I'm surprised I've never seen a model of this tank, when there seems to be a variation on just about every other vehicle that saw some kind of service. Thanks though, and thanks for your widespread input on this site. Cheers Tim
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stuart tank fuel tank Luke R The Armour Forum 11 17-09-14 12:42
M38A1 gas tank vs CJ5 gas tank maple_leaf_eh Post-war Military Vehicles 3 31-05-14 21:03
MK1 Canadian tank hunter radiator overflow tank kevin powles The Carrier Forum 5 08-06-09 20:21
RE: Churchill Tank at Melbourne Tank Museum Auction EnfieldGuy For Sale Or Wanted 0 17-05-06 04:34


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 11:13.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016