MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > GENERAL WW2 TOPICS > The MLU Sappers Mess

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-04-08, 22:25
Noel Burgess Noel Burgess is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Teesside, NE England
Posts: 211
Default FBE and Assault Boat Rafting

Here’s some photos from the Sikorsky collection showing what appears to be a training exercise in FBE and Assault Boat(?) rafting.
To see more go here http://www.cultura.marche.it/cultura...98&order=id%3F look at the groups of pictures from 98 to 103

Here's some of the FBE pictures
Attached Images
File Type: jpg FBE 9 Polish.jpg (46.2 KB, 108 views)
File Type: jpg FBE 10 Polish.jpg (53.3 KB, 104 views)
File Type: jpg FBE 3 Polish.jpg (48.5 KB, 112 views)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-04-08, 22:37
Noel Burgess Noel Burgess is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Teesside, NE England
Posts: 211
Default

Here’s some of the assault boat rafting (I think) – actually I did not know that this was done; does anyone have more information
Attached Images
File Type: jpg FBE 8 Polish.jpg (49.0 KB, 103 views)
File Type: jpg FBE 14 Polish.jpg (58.0 KB, 99 views)
File Type: jpg FBE 18 Polish.jpg (52.9 KB, 97 views)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-04-08, 23:20
servicepub (RIP)'s Avatar
servicepub (RIP) servicepub (RIP) is offline
RIP
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 1,734
Default

There is some additional information in this publication;

__________________
Those who live by the sword will be shot by those of us who have progressed.
- M38A1, 67-07800, ex LETE
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 16-04-08, 04:19
sapper740's Avatar
sapper740 sapper740 is offline
Derek Heuring
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Corinth, Texas
Posts: 2,018
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Noel Burgess View Post
Here’s some of the assault boat rafting (I think) – actually I did not know that this was done; does anyone have more information

Evening Noel. It wasn't uncommon to use FBE as a method of transporting loads across water obstacles. In cases where the amount of kit to move didn't necessitate erecting a Bailey or pontoon bridge, FBE was often used to transport small loads.


CHIMO! Derek.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg AT gun on storm boats.jpg (56.3 KB, 97 views)
__________________
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 22-04-08, 00:29
Noel Burgess Noel Burgess is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Teesside, NE England
Posts: 211
Default

Thanks Derek
I notice the raft you posted has 2 assault boats with touching sides, held together with "notched" timbers. The Polish version uses some form of tubular frame in each boat onto which two trackways fit - this holds the boats some distance appart.
Does anyone know the correct designations (if any) for these rafting systems and which trackway the Polish one uses?
Also note: 1. they seem to be carried on 15cwt trailers (first pic. I posted)
2. note the spare wheel cover on the jeep (last pic)
Noel
Attached Images
File Type: jpg FBE 15 Polish.jpg (45.5 KB, 84 views)
File Type: jpg FBE 16 Polish.jpg (47.3 KB, 81 views)
File Type: jpg FBE 19 Polish.jpg (45.3 KB, 90 views)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 22-04-08, 03:53
sapper740's Avatar
sapper740 sapper740 is offline
Derek Heuring
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Corinth, Texas
Posts: 2,018
Default Check out Army Motors #110

Noel, if you receive or have access to ARMY MOTORS #110, look on page 11 of Terry Johns' article regarding Canadian T16s. There are two pictures (NAC PA-167200 & NAC PA-167198) showing Canadian Engineers ferrying two T16s; CT93798 and CT95804 across the Afwalnings Canal. In that instance the Engineers are using metal beams athwart the FBE supporting SBG bridging onto which the carrier is driven. The beams have clamps which fasten onto the boats coaming. I don't know the nomenclature for this kit but it's definitely purpose built.

CHIMO! Derek.
__________________
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 22-04-08, 14:49
Noel Burgess Noel Burgess is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Teesside, NE England
Posts: 211
Default

Regret I do not have access to "Army Motors" but I quote below from the Trux website [www.truxmodels.co.uk] - this appears to be another method of ferrying a carrier.

Quote:
ATTACHMENT MKI, CARRIER FLOTATION (ASSAULT BOAT)
This simple attachment enabled two assault boats to float a carrier across a water obstacle.

Two light steel beams were clamped to the sides of the Universal carrier. Struts connected the beams to the bottom of the bearers of the assault boat. The clamps were quick release so that the carrier could go into action very quickly once it had reached the far bank. Equally important was the fact that the quick release clamps allowed the complete assembly of boats and struts to be lifted off and return for another carrier without delay.

The boats and struts needed to be fitted on dry land, preferably near the water but out of sight of the enemy. It was also important to find a launching site with banks which were not so steep as to cause the boat to swamp when entering the water. The same was true at the far bank. A landing site was required which gave an unhindered passage to the somewhat unwieldly boats and was not so steep as to swamp them. Canvas dodgers could be fitted to the bow and stern to help prevent swamping.

All Carriers had to be of the welded type and might need waterproofing.

Propulsion was normally by the Carriers own tracks.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 19:02.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016