MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > 'B' ECHELON > The Sergeants' Mess

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 27-05-20, 04:47
maple_leaf_eh maple_leaf_eh is offline
Terry Warner
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: On the river flats in a poor part of town
Posts: 2,498
Default

Just to keep the conversation interesting, there have been two huge electronic petitions posted calling for reviews or repeal of the contentious Order In Council, a class action lawsuit, and today a major suit calling for a judicial review of the Order and the mechanisms. Still no word on 10,000 joule-plus muzzle energy or larger than 20mm bore size, err? weapons (can't call them firearms as per the previous definition in the Criminal Code).
__________________
Terry Warner

74-????? M151A2 plated and on the road
70-08876 M38A1 ready for the road
53-71233 M100CDN trailer manufactured by MCI ready for the road

Wow! All three green beasties run!
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 27-05-20, 08:08
Lynn Eades's Avatar
Lynn Eades Lynn Eades is offline
Bluebell
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand
Posts: 5,048
Default

But very well put Tony
__________________
Bluebell

Carrier Armoured O.P. No1 Mk3 W. T84991
Carrier Bren No2.Mk.I. NewZealand Railways. NZR.6.
Dodge WC55. 37mm Gun Motor Carriage M6
Jeep Mb #135668
So many questions....
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 27-05-20, 13:22
Bruce Parker Bruce Parker is offline
GM Fox I
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: SW Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,994
Default

The ban was a response to a shooting (and an arson that killed almost as many people as the guns) yet goes after legal gun owners and types of firearms, and firearms looking things that really aren't, that the shooter didn't even come close to using. Needless to say the shooter/arsonist was not a licenced gun owner, had been banned from owning them and had a violent past.

The ban was supposed to leave legitimate hunters and sports shooters alone, yet goes after them precisely. Caught in the ban, but stated as not being subject to it yet are, are high end big game and target rifles, many historic antiques, modern muzzle loaders, sporting shotguns and even some industrial devices that shoot projectiles.

The question is whether these things were sloppily included in the government's haste (strike while the tragedy is still fresh I guess) or intended.

Regardless, if the ban isn't overturned it will be the end of many small businesses and the investments hundreds of thousands of people make to the economy, not to mention their own, safe enjoyment.

For this community it is a strong signal the Canadian government does not condone your enthusiasm for military history nor your 'fetish' (our Prime Minister's exact word) for wanting to own it. The group we have running Canada today has shown a distain for all things military, past and present so don't be looking at them to preserve anything.
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 07-06-20, 20:46
Ed Storey Ed Storey is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 1,062
Default Magazine Capacity

With the ongoing debate over stricter gun control in Canada it never hurts to provide the uneducated, non-firearm owning, voting masses with as much mis-information as possible. This was published in the 6 June edition of The Ottawa Citizen.

Click image for larger version

Name:	6 June, 2020 - Five-Bullet Limit Urged to Curb Mass Shootings - Ottawa Citizen.jpg
Views:	21
Size:	253.7 KB
ID:	114494
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 07-06-20, 22:47
Bruce Parker Bruce Parker is offline
GM Fox I
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: SW Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,994
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed Storey View Post
With the ongoing debate over stricter gun control in Canada it never hurts to provide the uneducated, non-firearm owning, voting masses with as much mis-information as possible. This was published in the 6 June edition of The Ottawa Citizen.

Attachment 114494
Double banning and re-illegalizing something that's already illegal should fix up the gun problem in Canada that, well, is not actually a problem unless you throw in gangs which tend the flaunt guns laws for some strange reason. I think where the zealots are going with this is they want the magazine itself to be only tall enough to hold 5 rounds, sort of like a 3" Sten mag or a stubby Bren banana 'clip'. Or like bastardizing one of those $2000 Bren drums. Great for soothing your uneducated urban folks but not so historically accurate.

I'm starting to believe this Canadian ban was based on the need to prohibit anything and everything that brings a smile to a gun owner or collector's face.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Canadian Tulip Festival 2020 > online Stuart Fedak Military Shows & Events 0 25-03-20 22:49
firearms law changes in NZ Lynn Eades The Sergeants' Mess 5 12-07-19 07:01
Firearms swap meet DanJahn Military Shows & Events 0 07-09-13 08:20
Is legislation coming to restrict military vehicle ownership in G.B. c. ladouceur (RIP) The Sergeants' Mess 1 19-08-05 08:22
Bill C10-A, an amendment to the Firearms Act Jon Skagfeld The Sergeants' Mess 0 04-04-05 20:48


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 20:12.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016