MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Carrier Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 17-09-13, 23:22
RichardT10829's Avatar
RichardT10829 RichardT10829 is offline
Richard Harrison
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cullercoats Newcastle Upon Tyne United Kingdom
Posts: 3,059
Default Cam plate adjustment.

Fitted my cam plate back in tonight along with the linkage rods, I adjusted the rollers in and when i turn the wheel it feels quite rough and notchy, is there a specific distance the rollers should be from the cam plate when it is in the central position as mine are both touching the cam plate now.
__________________
is mos redintegro

__5th Div___46th Div__
1942 Ford Universal Carrier No.3 MkI*
Lower Hull No. 10131
War Department CT54508 (SOLD)
1944 Ford Universal Carrier MkII* (under restoration).
1944 Morris C8 radio body (under restoration).
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 17-09-13, 23:42
rob love rob love is offline
carrier mech
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Shilo MB, the armpit of Canada
Posts: 7,521
Default

They should be touching with almost no freeplay, and both rods should be the same length. One issue I have seen in the past is where guys have tried to build up the cam plates for some reason. Truly a terrible idea, as you are messing blindly with mathematics. If you think about it, the total distance across any point, through the center of the bearing, and back to the opposite side must remain the same at any point of travel.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 18-09-13, 00:06
RichardT10829's Avatar
RichardT10829 RichardT10829 is offline
Richard Harrison
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cullercoats Newcastle Upon Tyne United Kingdom
Posts: 3,059
Default

Yeah that's how they are, one rod is a smidge longer than the other (about 2 - 3mm) the yoke is centralised with the single spoke on the steering wheel parallel to the steering shaft, the rear of the cam plate is parallel with the edge of the aperture that the cam plate bolts to. I just thought that the steering would be a bit lighter as all, it's a two handed job to turn it.
__________________
is mos redintegro

__5th Div___46th Div__
1942 Ford Universal Carrier No.3 MkI*
Lower Hull No. 10131
War Department CT54508 (SOLD)
1944 Ford Universal Carrier MkII* (under restoration).
1944 Morris C8 radio body (under restoration).
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 18-09-13, 05:14
rob love rob love is offline
carrier mech
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Shilo MB, the armpit of Canada
Posts: 7,521
Default

Is the center bearing new? Are both the rollers at the hull free to turn? Is the crosshaft clean? Have you had the cross shaft right out?

One hand should move the hull left and right during the travel of the cross shaft. Two hands indicates other problems.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 18-09-13, 08:38
Ben Ben is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 544
Default

Is the weight of the hull on the crosstube rollers (is it sitting on the wheels) I think the weight has to be on the crosstube otherwise your pushing the tube through the hull and not using the rollers.

I'm just building the same area up. I've put new bearings in the cam rollers, steering and cam. The crosstube rollers got stripped and greased too. Interested to see how you get on, you can be the guinea pig
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 18-09-13, 09:21
RichardT10829's Avatar
RichardT10829 RichardT10829 is offline
Richard Harrison
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cullercoats Newcastle Upon Tyne United Kingdom
Posts: 3,059
Default

Carrier on axle stands, brand new bearings in rollers and cam plate, cross tube is immaculate now, I could push and pull it through with ease by hand prior to fitting the cam plate.... it was fine until I adjusted the rollers closer in so I think it's something I have done rather than a knackered component
__________________
is mos redintegro

__5th Div___46th Div__
1942 Ford Universal Carrier No.3 MkI*
Lower Hull No. 10131
War Department CT54508 (SOLD)
1944 Ford Universal Carrier MkII* (under restoration).
1944 Morris C8 radio body (under restoration).
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 18-09-13, 10:49
Richard Farrant's Avatar
Richard Farrant Richard Farrant is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Kent, England
Posts: 3,635
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardT10829 View Post
Carrier on axle stands, brand new bearings in rollers and cam plate, cross tube is immaculate now, I could push and pull it through with ease by hand prior to fitting the cam plate.... it was fine until I adjusted the rollers closer in so I think it's something I have done rather than a knackered component

the camplate bearing, is it supposed to be a self aligning type? Maybe it is a normal ballrace fitted and not in line with the linkage.
__________________
Richard

1943 Bedford QLD lorry - 1941 BSA WM20 m/cycle - 1943 Daimler Scout Car Mk2
Member of MVT, IMPS, MVG of NSW, KVE and AMVCS
KVE President & KVE News Editor
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 18-09-13, 10:57
RichardT10829's Avatar
RichardT10829 RichardT10829 is offline
Richard Harrison
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cullercoats Newcastle Upon Tyne United Kingdom
Posts: 3,059
Default

I got the part number from the book and purchased an identical one all be it a sealed version of the same bearing.

What it looks like to me is the cam plate is being pushed into the opposite roller with some force, I will check my UC-F1 when I find it..... There must be a tolerance setting or some sort of feeler gauge used to set the distances.. (Or am I being all modern here)

Keep the suggestions coming though as it helps us all I am sure.

Cheers

Richie
__________________
is mos redintegro

__5th Div___46th Div__
1942 Ford Universal Carrier No.3 MkI*
Lower Hull No. 10131
War Department CT54508 (SOLD)
1944 Ford Universal Carrier MkII* (under restoration).
1944 Morris C8 radio body (under restoration).

Last edited by RichardT10829; 18-09-13 at 11:07.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 18-09-13, 11:02
Richard Farrant's Avatar
Richard Farrant Richard Farrant is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Kent, England
Posts: 3,635
Default

OK Rich,
I recollected talk of these bearings recently and wondered if it might be the reason it was tight when connected to the camplate. Best of luck.

regards Richard
__________________
Richard

1943 Bedford QLD lorry - 1941 BSA WM20 m/cycle - 1943 Daimler Scout Car Mk2
Member of MVT, IMPS, MVG of NSW, KVE and AMVCS
KVE President & KVE News Editor
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 18-09-13, 11:47
kevin powles's Avatar
kevin powles kevin powles is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: united kingdom
Posts: 1,960
Default Adjustment

Rich, look in the chigwell book, it shows you the way of adjusting the rollers, from memory the inner one is adjusted to touch when cam central then a clearance is obtained on the other. One thing to note is that if you have your rear brake rods connected also it could be notcy because of a problem there. I had a similar issue with mine, what had happened is the rod had pulled out the brake adjuster, when assembling your adjusters tape both the actuating pistons in fully and remove the tape when located on the brake shoes, correct size split pins in the adjusters will stop this happening but best to tape up also whilst fitting.

Measure your cross tube protrusion from carrier hull to check distance is equal also when cam central and adjusted.
__________________
2pdr Tank Hunter Universal Carrier 1942 registered 11/11/2008.
3" Mortar Universal Carrier 1943 registered 06/06/2009.
1941 Standard Mk1 stowage Carrier, Caunter camo.
1941 Standard Mk1 stowage Carrier, light stone.
10 cwt wartime mortar trailer.
1943 Mk2 Daimler Dingo.
1943 Willys MB.
1936 Vickers MG carrier No1 Mk1 CMM 985.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 18-09-13, 12:44
RichardT10829's Avatar
RichardT10829 RichardT10829 is offline
Richard Harrison
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cullercoats Newcastle Upon Tyne United Kingdom
Posts: 3,059
Default

Right just got back from the garage... The front to rear brake rods are not attached (at this time they are yet to even exist ). I backed off the inner roller a wee smidge and it runs like butter now. The axle was centred before I started each stub measuring 13" give a gnats tadger. There is no obvious free play and everything appears to look good. It may not be much of a job real time, but over all it is a big deal as its the first time the control surfaces have worked correctly since I got the carrier, and first time in nearly twenty years they have worked full stop.

Bit firmly between my teeth now !
__________________
is mos redintegro

__5th Div___46th Div__
1942 Ford Universal Carrier No.3 MkI*
Lower Hull No. 10131
War Department CT54508 (SOLD)
1944 Ford Universal Carrier MkII* (under restoration).
1944 Morris C8 radio body (under restoration).
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 18-09-13, 13:40
rob love rob love is offline
carrier mech
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Shilo MB, the armpit of Canada
Posts: 7,521
Default

If the hull is on axle stands, then the cross shaft is dragging on the bottom of the hull, rather than floating up against the rollers. Put the vehicle weight back on it and try again. Ben said it first, so I won't take credit if that is the case.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 18-09-13, 14:19
RichardT10829's Avatar
RichardT10829 RichardT10829 is offline
Richard Harrison
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cullercoats Newcastle Upon Tyne United Kingdom
Posts: 3,059
Default

Yeah I will do, but in comparison to last night it is much much better now.i pretty much had the rollers squeezing into the cam face which is probably why it was so tight to turn, the rollers are juuuuuuuuust touching the cam face in the neutral position now, and like I say, no slop, and smooth one handed action... Ahem no puns....
__________________
is mos redintegro

__5th Div___46th Div__
1942 Ford Universal Carrier No.3 MkI*
Lower Hull No. 10131
War Department CT54508 (SOLD)
1944 Ford Universal Carrier MkII* (under restoration).
1944 Morris C8 radio body (under restoration).
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 18-09-13, 14:22
Lynn Eades Lynn Eades is offline
Bluebell
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand
Posts: 5,534
Default

Richard when the carrier is on its tracks with the weight down. swings the hull easily from side to side. the rollers should have a 0.001" clearance. What Rob was referring to was that a badly profiled cam plate will not maintain this clearence through its travel.
The self aligning bearing goes in the bottom of the steering column, not the cam plate. It seems it wasn't important to use one, as many were fitted with annular grooved ball races (ordinary brg) in service.
Be aware that the spline at the steering box is indexed to the column, and needs to be correctly timed. The Canadian MkI* book gives a very good description of how to set it all up.
__________________
Bluebell

Carrier Armoured O.P. No1 Mk3 W. T84991
Carrier Bren No2.Mk.I. NewZealand Railways. NZR.6.
Dodge WC55. 37mm Gun Motor Carriage M6
Jeep Mb #135668
So many questions....
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 18-09-13, 17:17
RichardT10829's Avatar
RichardT10829 RichardT10829 is offline
Richard Harrison
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cullercoats Newcastle Upon Tyne United Kingdom
Posts: 3,059
Default

Cheers guys, I suppose I won't really know until its on its wheels again. Good news is now that the cam is in and the bellows are on the axle, I can drop it onto its wheels + tracks. Imminently !
__________________
is mos redintegro

__5th Div___46th Div__
1942 Ford Universal Carrier No.3 MkI*
Lower Hull No. 10131
War Department CT54508 (SOLD)
1944 Ford Universal Carrier MkII* (under restoration).
1944 Morris C8 radio body (under restoration).
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
M38A1 float adjustment...? Casey B Post-war Military Vehicles 2 14-08-17 07:06
Valve tappet adjustment Little Jo The Restoration Forum 8 22-04-11 06:10
AIF Bren gun carrier track adjustment tool Ausmick For Sale Or Wanted 0 13-03-10 22:04
Headlight Adjustment Ken Hughes The Restoration Forum 9 13-02-10 01:52
Universal Carrier track adjustment Eric Szalanda The Carrier Forum 1 07-01-07 01:18


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 11:22.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016