MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > 'B' ECHELON > Tributes

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-05-14, 22:42
John McGillivray's Avatar
John McGillivray John McGillivray is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Quebec
Posts: 1,089
Default R.I.P. Farley Mowat

Beloved Canadian author Farley Mowat dead at 92

Quote:
Andrea Janus, CTVNews.ca
Published Wednesday, May 7, 2014 12:42PM EDT
Last Updated Wednesday, May 7, 2014 4:04PM EDT
Beloved author Farley Mowat, who was known as much for his environmental activism as for his vivid literary depictions of the Canadian wilderness, has died. He was 92.
A cause of death was not immediately made public.
Born in Belleville, Ont., and raised in Ontario and Saskatchewan, Mowat became best known for telling stories set against the Canadian wilderness.

His most famous works included “The Dog Who Wouldn’t Be” from 1957, “Owls in the Family” from 1961 and “Never Cry Wolf” from 1963.
“Lost in the Barrens,” published in 1956, won the Governor General’s Award, while “The Boat Who Wouldn’t Float” won the Leacock Medal for Humour in 1970.
Mowat wrote 40 books, which were translated into 52 languages and sold more than 17 million copies worldwide.
Mowat was made an Officer of the Order of Canada in 1981.
“Farley Mowat was a passionate Canadian who shaped a lot of my generation growing up with his books,” Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau told reporters on Parliament Hill upon hearing the news. “He will be sorely missed.”
Mowat was a family friend who gave the young Trudeau boys a Labrador retriever they named Farley “who had a penchant for running after porcupines,” Trudeau said.
Green Party Leader Elizabeth May was a friend of Mowat’s for more than 30 years and named the author a godfather to her daughter.
“Farley was extraordinarily talented author and writer, as well as, of course, an activist and defender of all wild things,” she told CTV News Channel in a telephone interview from Ottawa.
Prime Minister Stephen Harper issued a statement Wednesday afternoon, extending his “deepest condolences” to Mowat’s friends and family.
“One of Canada’s most widely read authors, he was a natural storyteller with a real gift for sharing personal anecdotes in a witty and endearing way. His literary works almost always reflected his deep love of nature and of animals,” Harper said.

“Mr. Mowat will be remembered as a passionate Canadian. His legacy will live on in the treasure of Canadian literature he leaves behind, which will remain a joy to both new and old fans around the world.”
NDP Leader Tom Mulcair tweeted that Canada “has lost a great Canadian today.
“Farley Mowat’s work as an author and environmentalist has had a great impact on Canada and the world.”
Authors Margaret Atwood and Graeme Gibson issued a statement, saying they are “deeply sorry to hear this sad news.
“Farley was a great and iconic Canadian who understood our environmental problems decades before others did. He loved this country with a passion and threw himself into the fray -- in wartime as well -- also with a passion. He was so good-natured and down to earth. We will miss him very much.”
Publisher Doug Gibson recalled “a small, feisty, kilt-wearing character” who “wore his kilt dangerously.”
“He always enjoyed the odd drink or two or three,” Gibson told CTV News Channel. “He may have been small in stature, but boy he was a great character and a greater writer.”
Mowat ‘passionate for this country’
Mowat was perhaps known as much for his environmental activism as he was for his writing. Literary agent Robert Mackwood said Mowat’s “passion” for the environment dated back to his early writings.
“As somebody who was out there living on the land, living in the environment, that was what was ingrained in him,” Mackwood told CTV News Channel in a telephone interview from B.C. “He was very passionate about this country, very passionate about the land, the seas, the oceans.”
Mowat was recognized “wherever he went,” Mackwood said, and was “just a pleasure to be around.”
“He was someone that people immediately gravitated to, and someone who could tell a story, tell a yarn,” Mackwood said.
Talk radio host John Moore, who interviewed Mowat many times, said the author “lived a life that just does not exist anymore.” Mowat built a shack in the wilderness, grew his own food and visited places that others had not.
Mowat was “an adventurer, a wonderful writer and a great storyteller,” Moore told News Channel.
Mowat was born in Belleville, Ont., on May 12, 1921.
After his family moved to Saskatoon, Mowat was a teenaged bird columnist for the Saskatoon Star-Phoenix.
He served in the Second World War, stationed largely in Italy, an experience that informed a later book, 1979’s “And No Birds Sang.” Upon his return to Canada and enrollment at the University of Toronto, Mowat embarked on a field trip to the north that introduced him to the plight of Canada’s Inuit. That led to his first book, 1952’s “People of the Deer,” the first of many of the “controversial books,” according to Gibson.
“Very early on, he caught on to the fact that, ‘wait a minute, we’re treating the natural world very badly,’” Gibson said.
“He was on to the common plight that we all have, that people are slowly catching up to, that we have to preserve the natural world in order to preserve our inheritance.”
Among his many books was 1984’s “Sea of Slaughter,” which looked at how Canada has treated ocean-dwelling wildlife.
Mowat was “massively discouraged” by what he saw as the failure of human beings to protect the planet and all creatures that live on it, May said.
“Farley was less charitable to humanity than I am,” May said. “He was less willing to say that humanity was playing a positive role on this planet because of the massive destruction and threat to other life forms.”
Mowat also wrote several books about Newfoundland based on the eight years he lived there. Upon leaving Newfoundland, he settled in Port Hope, Ont.
In 2002, the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society named its ship RV Farley Mowat in honour of his anti-whaling activism. In 2006, a school named for him opened in an Ottawa suburb.
Read more: http://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/beloved...#ixzz3143PvD00
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 31-05-14, 14:50
Marc Montgomery's Avatar
Marc Montgomery Marc Montgomery is offline
aut viam inveniam aut fac
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 606
Default

He also formed ("invented" more realistically) the 1st Canadian Army Museum Collection team- in which he collected lots of German military hardware, including "stealing" a V2 rocket from under the noses of Americans-- Canada was not "allowed" to have a V2.. he welded a conning tower on it. and told authorities it was a special submarine..it ended up in Canada but when Americans found out, they ordered the Cdn govt to hand it over... which they (weak-kneed,kowtowing) did. Still lots of German hardware in our museum was thanks to him
__________________
I see you stand like greyhounds in the slips,
Straining upon the start. The game's afoot!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 31-05-14, 18:03
Jon Skagfeld's Avatar
Jon Skagfeld Jon Skagfeld is offline
M38A1 CDN3
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Owen Sound ON
Posts: 2,190
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marc Montgomery View Post
He also formed ("invented" more realistically) the 1st Canadian Army Museum Collection team- in which he collected lots of German military hardware, including "stealing" a V2 rocket from under the noses of Americans-- Canada was not "allowed" to have a V2.. he welded a conning tower on it. and told authorities it was a special submarine..it ended up in Canada but when Americans found out, they ordered the Cdn govt to hand it over... which they (weak-kneed,kowtowing) did. Still lots of German hardware in our museum was thanks to him
There was a V2 on the CNE grounds ~mid '50s. It was located on a triangular piece of land with the Food Building to the right and the Grandstand to the left. No idea if this was "Mowat's" rocket, or if it was the one which the US complained about.
__________________
PRONTO SENDS
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 31-05-14, 18:08
Jon Skagfeld's Avatar
Jon Skagfeld Jon Skagfeld is offline
M38A1 CDN3
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Owen Sound ON
Posts: 2,190
Default

Mowat also wrote a book "Eastern Passage" which describes a little known fact that an American bomber, in some flight distress, jettisoned an atomic device into the St Lawrence River.

Mowat writes of grotesque malformations of fish and other ecological disasters in the area for years after.

Bet you didn't know about this!
__________________
PRONTO SENDS
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-06-14, 16:04
Marc Montgomery's Avatar
Marc Montgomery Marc Montgomery is offline
aut viam inveniam aut fac
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 606
Default

Nope, not many would know that... as for the V2 at the CNE...I suspect, but do not know, that it was either a mock-up, or "on loan" . If on loan, by that time I guess the technology was no longer so secret and maybe the Americans werent so concerned about it , and besides it was probably just an empty shell methinks

now lets talk about the Bomarc missiles and whether we ever were- actually- given nuclear warheads- or sandbags and the whole controversy over the Arrow... a WW2 era technology that still surpasses the performance of the F-35
__________________
I see you stand like greyhounds in the slips,
Straining upon the start. The game's afoot!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-06-14, 16:30
rob love rob love is offline
carrier mech
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Shilo MB, the armpit of Canada
Posts: 7,517
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marc Montgomery View Post
the Arrow... a WW2 era technology that still surpasses the performance of the F-35
I think the need for some level of patriotism is what causes Canadians make outlandish claims like this. The Arrow was far from being proven, was HUGE, and would not have had the benefits of the computers available to today's craft.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-06-14, 21:33
Jon Skagfeld's Avatar
Jon Skagfeld Jon Skagfeld is offline
M38A1 CDN3
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Owen Sound ON
Posts: 2,190
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rob love View Post
I think the need for some level of patriotism is what causes Canadians make outlandish claims like this. The Arrow was far from being proven, was HUGE, and would not have had the benefits of the computers available to today's craft.
To allay any Canadian jingoistic patriotism, here's a direct quote from Jan Zurakowski, during an interview:

"It was a very good plane but nothing special as several other countries were working on almost the same type of plane".
__________________
PRONTO SENDS
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-06-14, 21:43
maple_leaf_eh maple_leaf_eh is offline
Terry Warner
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Shouting at clouds
Posts: 3,081
Default

If it any indication of my opinion of Mowat as a human and public figure, I just lined the cat litter box with the front page of the paper.

I like some of his non preachy stories, and I know he has been a major Canadian figure in literature. Which sort of balances for his wartime service and collecting successes. The little Panzer I that was at the War Museum is one he apparently collected, and the administrators used in trade with Littlefield for something more relevant.
__________________
Terry Warner

- 74-????? M151A2
- 70-08876 M38A1
- 53-71233 M100CDN trailer

Beware! The Green Disease walks among us!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-06-14, 03:29
Marc Montgomery's Avatar
Marc Montgomery Marc Montgomery is offline
aut viam inveniam aut fac
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 606
Default

not so outlandish, not jingoistic..
it was faster even without the more powerful (Canadian) engine, and could fly higher, although combat range might be less (although different sources give different ranges including some that indicate greater range than F-35)
.However, given the almost 60 year difference, Im sure that a theoretical Arrow Mk-X would have improved range, and the fact that the F-35 for all its modernity..is several years behind schedule and still working out problems.

**as far as not having the benefits of computers available on todays aircraft...what planes in the late 50s had computer control? The Arrow was ahead of its time with near- fly by wire- technology...and given the 60 year gap, it seems fairly evident that later versions would naturally have been fitted with computers..

"the aircraft went supersonic on its third flight and,[49] on the seventh, broke 1,000 mph (1,600 km/h) at 50,000 ft (15,000 m), while climbing and accelerating. A top speed of Mach 1.98 was achieved, however this was not at the limits of its performance. * over 2,100 km/h (some sources say over 2,400 km/h) with much higher potential, vs F35 1,950 km/h

JAN Z speaking= "I will just speak for two minutes and twelve seconds. Time goes too fast for me! I am surprised that already we are celebrating the 40th anniversary of the first flight of the Avro Arrow. I must commend the Aerospace Heritage foundation of Canada, as well as the other organizations that keep the memory of the Avro Arrow as part of Canadian history. Those were the times when Canada stood at the forefront of a niche technology and I am proud that I was part of it.
The first flight of the Arrow was not my success. I carried before and after many more difficult and dangerous flights . It was successful in a more difficult step created by the thousands of, enthusiastic and hardworking men and women.
They were proud of this aircraft and that's why, later the silent cancellation of he Arrow was such a shock to many.
It was my privilege to work with many outstanding people: Jim Floyd, the Chief Designer of the Arrow, Mario Pesando. Excellent boss of the experimental section, Don Rogers, Manager of Test flight And of course my fellow test pilots: Peter Cope, Jack Woodman, Spud Potoki

Spud Potoki was the only test pilot to test all five arrows and he reached the highest speed at 1.98 mach number. I would like to like to point out that already on the seventh flight of the arrow at the altitude of 50,000 feet, I exceeded one thousand miles per hour. After 40 years, this performance is similar to the performance of the CF-18 of the Royal Canadian Air force. By the destructive cancellation, Avro missed its potential, but it still lives in the memory and hearts of Canadians. The success of creating this aircraft remains, and this is the way I would remember it today. Thank you "

Peter Cope Arrow test pilot=-
In a CBC documentary on the Arrow, Peter commented that “it was a phenomenal performing aircraft; our performance boys thought we might get Mach 1.6 out of it yet we flew it to nearly Mach 2. With the Iroquois engine we were talking about a 2.3 or 2.4 Mach number potential. There wasn’t a single plane flying at the time that could come anywhere near to touching that aeroplane. Boy, the day I saw them take the torches to those planes was the nearest I’ve come to shedding a tear over an aeroplane.

"Apart from a landing gear warning light, the flight was without problem. Zurakowski declared that the Arrow was easier to fly than the F-102 or the Gloster Javelin, two other delta-winged fighters. This would later be confirmed by other test pilots, who praised the handling of the CF-105 highly. "

"Jan continued flying on the Arrow until he was 44. Spud then took over most test flights. Jan stated the Arrow handled beautifully."
__________________
I see you stand like greyhounds in the slips,
Straining upon the start. The game's afoot!

Last edited by Marc Montgomery; 02-06-14 at 04:09.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-06-14, 05:58
rob love rob love is offline
carrier mech
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Shilo MB, the armpit of Canada
Posts: 7,517
Default

Well Marc, since the craft were destroyed, and the plans shredded, I guess we will never know if somehow Canada was about to produce a first rate plane. I guess we will have to rely on the patriotic hopes and fantasies.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-06-14, 12:40
Marc Montgomery's Avatar
Marc Montgomery Marc Montgomery is offline
aut viam inveniam aut fac
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 606
Default

fantasies Rob? with the less powerful test engine it had a higher cieling, and went faster. These are facts and not patriotic fantasies

agreed the "potential" will never be known, but the fact remains that Canadian engineers built a space age jet, using and advancing on ww2 technology.

It is also true that when the plant was closed, many engineers went to work in the US aerospace industry and NASA creating subsequent generations of advanced fighters and for the space programme

I fail to understand your antipathy. Why denigrate an amazing Canadian accomplishment?

Had it proceeded, would the original be competitive today, almost surely not, and would various subsequent Mk's be around today...also highly unlikely. It was designed for a fairly specific role, but could however have been the basis for an entire new Canadian aerospace industry. The CF-86 Canadian Orenda powered jets with other Cdn mods were faster better planes than the -GE powered F-86 for example (or so the books and pilots seem to indicate)
__________________
I see you stand like greyhounds in the slips,
Straining upon the start. The game's afoot!

Last edited by Marc Montgomery; 02-06-14 at 14:19.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-06-14, 18:53
rob love rob love is offline
carrier mech
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Shilo MB, the armpit of Canada
Posts: 7,517
Default

Well Marc, I suppose as long as we only wanted to wage war with the Northern USA, and didn't mind the 10 mile turn radius, then the Arrow it was.

At the time of the development, there were plenty of stories already about the problems with this craft. With no real hours put on them, then any hype as to it's long term superiority is just that: Hype.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-06-14, 02:58
Marc Montgomery's Avatar
Marc Montgomery Marc Montgomery is offline
aut viam inveniam aut fac
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 606
Default

2G turn at 50,000 ft at Mach 1.5 maintain speed and altitude... pretty darn good if you ask me..
Ive read several books on the Arrow, and lots of "papers" and opinions.. dont recall much complaining (um none?) on handling or performance.
Admittedly 70 hours of trials is not a lot, I guess, but otherwise you have to be amazed at what it actually did, and what its potential was, so at this point I think we've dragged this out enough.. so I leave you with your opinion, and me with the right one. ;-)
__________________
I see you stand like greyhounds in the slips,
Straining upon the start. The game's afoot!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-06-14, 22:21
John McGillivray's Avatar
John McGillivray John McGillivray is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Quebec
Posts: 1,089
Default

The Arrow was a single role fighter. It was designed to intercept and shoot down Soviet supersonic bombers. Since the soviets never built the large fleets of those bombers, the arrow was a plane without a mission.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-06-14, 00:43
Marc Montgomery's Avatar
Marc Montgomery Marc Montgomery is offline
aut viam inveniam aut fac
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 606
Default

the CF 104 was designed for the same "single" role..supersonic interceptor, a 1950s jet -older than the Arrow !!! which we held on to until the late 80s

It was later roled as nuclear strike carrier and recon, then as a bomber, then as a fighter (although with large stabilizers passing for wings, was probably less manoueverable than the arrow ,,,they couldnt turn worth crap....(-and I flew in one- after passing HAI and viewing the film. 104 ways you will die in this plane... not the actual title, but basically that was the subject, I think the stall recovery needed was 25,000 ft, got to fly it for a few minutes too)

also the 104 was re-modelled as the U2-- so pretty sure the arrow could- maybe would- have been re-adapted for other roles

(by the way, the existence of the CIA- U2 and Russian overflights was long publicly denied by the US-although the Russians knew it... but couldnt prove it- and some higher ups in the CIA were very anxious about the Arrows ability in speed and height to intercept an "unidentified" aircraft if ti happened to fly over Canadian airspace and thus confirm its existence (conspiracy theory starts-and so tried to put the kibosh on the Arrow..and succeeded in 1959)

...1960-eventually the Russians built a SAM-2 capable of going high enough to hit the U2 and Gary Powers- who was supposed to take a cyanide pill but didnt and was also supposed to activate the plane's self destruct explosives..but didnt and the Soviets recovered lots of info from the plane which surprisingly crashed without catastophic damage.- one investigation blamed him, another didnt. he died in a TV helicopter crash in 77, and is buried in Arlington.
__________________
I see you stand like greyhounds in the slips,
Straining upon the start. The game's afoot!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 18:05.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016