MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > 'B' ECHELON > The Sergeants' Mess

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-02-17, 05:09
derk derin's Avatar
derk derin derk derin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: West st. Paul,Manitoba
Posts: 701
Default Canadian Camo combat pants in the 1960's?

Hi All,
Have been going through my collection tonight and came across a pair of Canadian issue combat pants dated 1963 which I believe was the first year they came out with the combats replacing the bush dress of the 1950's. I was given these pair of pants probably 15 years ago and at first thought somebody washed them and bleach somehow got on them and turned the material a funny color but as I looked at them closely, the material was purposely died this way and then sewn together. Were there to anybody's knowledge Camoflage combats produced? I have only ever seen this one pair and am curious about them. Anybody have information on the Canadian Combat uniform from the 1960's? Would love to know more about them. Thanks for any information you can give me.
Regards,Derk
Attached Thumbnails
Canadian combat pants 001.jpg   Canadian combat pants 002.jpg   Canadian combat pants 003.jpg   Canadian combat pants 006.jpg   Canadian combat pants 009.jpg  

__________________
1942 Ford universal carrier Mk 1
1943 Ford 60 cwt long CMP ambulance
1943 Ford GPW 1/4 ton stretcher jeep
1943 Bantam T-3 1/4 ton trailer
BSA folding airborne bicycle ser#R5325 (early)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-02-17, 06:20
rob love rob love is offline
carrier mech
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Shilo MB, the armpit of Canada
Posts: 7,517
Default

I would suggest you go back to the bleach theory for two reasons. First, the tag does not differentiate from a normal pair of combat pants and calls them GS.

Second, the camoglauge pattern runs right through things like the pocket and accross the crotch. Nobody matches camoflauge that way when making uniforms.

I note there is no NSN on the tag. I believe the NSNs just came into being (adopted from the US federal stock number system) in that year.

Last edited by rob love; 06-02-17 at 16:37.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-02-17, 15:56
maple_leaf_eh maple_leaf_eh is offline
Terry Warner
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Shouting at clouds
Posts: 3,081
Default Camouflage combat pants

"Never attribute to conspiracy what incompetence can explain," to paraphrase a Cold War era Russian spy handler.

The colour changes look too closely matched for me to believe the fabric was sewn that way on purpose. Having observed a number of different nations' camouflage uniforms, there is never any attempt to match edges or carry over patterns. In fact, doing so would make the purpose of the clever design less effective. I agree that bleach in the wash caused this accidentally effective pattern.

To answer your higher level question about Canadian camouflage uniforms, no. The WW2 Denison smocks were the height of fashion amongst senior officers who wanted to look like parachutists or snipers. The Canadian Airborne Regiment smocks appeared in the 1970s, but were only one garment. The rest of the soldier's uniform was conventional olive green. Sometime in the 80's there was an attempt to trial the same colour scheme in shirts and pants. I believe when the trials were cancelled, a few pairs were never returned (see my comment about high Look Cool Factor - LCF) and whatever was leftover was sold to Tanzania! The Garrison Dress smocks were next and shortlived. CADPAT has been the current fabric since just before Afghanistan. The no-nametag folks in Special Forces wear a variety of Crye-brand MULTICAM pattern uniforms to sustain their LCF.
__________________
Terry Warner

- 74-????? M151A2
- 70-08876 M38A1
- 53-71233 M100CDN trailer

Beware! The Green Disease walks among us!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-02-17, 19:32
chris vickery's Avatar
chris vickery chris vickery is offline
3RD ECHELON WKSP
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Nipissing Ontario Canada
Posts: 2,955
Default

Terry, I used to own a pair of the camo airborne regt pants. Wore them until they wore out. I guess in hindsight a stupid move as they would have been a great collectable today. The best part was that they were human sized. Size 6 large regular....
__________________
3RD Echelon Wksp

1968 M274A5 Mule Baifield USMC
1966 M274A2 Mule BMY USMC
1958 M274 Mule Willys US Army
1970 M38A1 CDN3 70-08715 1 CSR
1981 MANAC 3/4T CDN trailer
1943 Converto Airborne Trailer
1983 M1009 CUCV

RT-524, PRC-77s,
and trucks and stuff and more stuff and and.......

OMVA, MVPA, G503, Steel Soldiers
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-02-17, 21:00
Ed Storey Ed Storey is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 1,426
Default Camouflage Misconceptions

Just to clear up a few misconceptions, the camouflage uniform being discussed was a Canadian trials British DPM style pattern that had been initiated in the early 1970s. The trials seem to have progressed to the point where this uniform would have replaced the OG 107 (green) coloured Combat Uniform that had been issued since the early 1960s; but for whatever reason, I suspect perhaps due to finances, this never happened. Tanzania was the recipient of the clothing although a number of pieces could be found languishing in surplus stores well into the 1980s.

These are the trousers.

Click image for larger version

Name:	Canadian Experimental Camouflage.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	223.4 KB
ID:	88507

The Parachute Smock, Disruptive Pattern was developed for the Airborne and their associated units and issued in the late 1970s as a replacement for the OG 107 Nylon Parachute Smock that had been in use since the mid-1950s. The British DPM style camouflage used a pattern similar to the trials clothing and this smock was used until the advent of CADPAT in the late 1990s early 2000s.

Click image for larger version

Name:	Parachutist Smock, Disruptive Pattern - front.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	204.2 KB
ID:	88508

As I stated in the first paragraph, the trials camouflage clothing could be readily found in surplus stores in the late 1970s but it was not an issue item, therefore the trousers should not be considered an 'Airborne' item.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-02-17, 23:38
derk derin's Avatar
derk derin derk derin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: West st. Paul,Manitoba
Posts: 701
Default

Thanks for everybody's input. I only wondered about accidental bleaching or purposely camoflouged as the inside labels and green material were not affected which made me think the outside material was dyed that way and then sewn together. I would have thought bleach would have discolored the inside green material and washed out the labels as well? At least I don't have to look for a matching jacket now!
Regards,Derk
__________________
1942 Ford universal carrier Mk 1
1943 Ford 60 cwt long CMP ambulance
1943 Ford GPW 1/4 ton stretcher jeep
1943 Bantam T-3 1/4 ton trailer
BSA folding airborne bicycle ser#R5325 (early)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-02-17, 01:32
Ed Storey Ed Storey is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 1,426
Default Bleaching

It looks like the nylon areas were unaffected.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-02-17, 01:25
Eric B Eric B is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 580
Default Camo pants

It looks more like oil stains than bleach to me.

Eric
__________________
Collecting data on the WW2 Canadian jeep and trailer.
Serial, WD Numbers etc.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-05-17, 13:10
randall klein randall klein is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: toronto
Posts: 37
Default

Derk

Peerless Garments is still making uniforms for the CAF. Perhaps send them an inquiry?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-05-17, 17:32
derk derin's Avatar
derk derin derk derin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: West st. Paul,Manitoba
Posts: 701
Default

I remembered hearing that if the guys washed their combats at home with a certain detergent or too much detergent that it would turn the material a ''Pinkish'' color so I am thinking that is what happened here. Especially where the nylon material was not affected but the cloth material was. And here I thought I had a very rare set of Canadian ''Camouflaged'' combat pants!
Regards,Derk
__________________
1942 Ford universal carrier Mk 1
1943 Ford 60 cwt long CMP ambulance
1943 Ford GPW 1/4 ton stretcher jeep
1943 Bantam T-3 1/4 ton trailer
BSA folding airborne bicycle ser#R5325 (early)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PR movie early 1960's Mike Kelly Post-war Military Vehicles 7 21-10-15 12:14
Champs~Humber~Ferret 2/14 QMI 1960's oztankboy Post-war Military Vehicles 1 04-02-10 22:07
Canadian Combat Jackets for sale Greg For Sale Or Wanted 0 06-05-09 16:41
Arid Cadpat Pants Greg For Sale Or Wanted 0 12-12-08 22:48
Canadian Battledress XL and Pants chris vickery For Sale Or Wanted 6 08-10-08 15:03


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 10:52.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016