MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Softskin Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-02-05, 01:19
Brian Gough Brian Gough is offline
HUP guy
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Oshawa, ON, Canada
Posts: 428
Default C8AX production

To David Hayward,

At the end of your posting "Ford engine enigma" on the Softskin Forum, you said:

"Incidentally I also have the GM of Canada monthly 216 Chev and 248 GMC figures for the war and 'CKD' production by month."

Are you able to provide the CKD figures for May and June 1943?

If so, can the number of C8AX vehicles (chassis XH8448) produced on Contract 2394 for New Zealand be determined? ........ and from that number, we can finally learn how many C8A Heavy Utilities were produced, based on the published total of 12,967 for both the C8A and the C8AX.

Thanks in advance for anything more you can provide.

Brian
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-02-05, 05:23
Tony Smith's Avatar
Tony Smith Tony Smith is offline
No1, Mk 2** (I'm back!)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lithgow, NSW, Australia
Posts: 5,042
Default

And could you possibly be able to shed some light on why all C8AX data plates I've seen show the build date as 5 May 43 or 5 June 43? (with variations between 5 5 43 and 5 May 43. Done by different people or different days?)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-02-05, 09:21
David_Hayward (RIP)'s Avatar
David_Hayward (RIP) David_Hayward (RIP) is offline
former Resident Historian
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The New Forest, England
Posts: 3,841
Default CKD production

There were 3,414 and 3,330 CKD units in May and June 1943 with 108 in July.

These are the sum total of known C8AX chassis:

ALL S/M 2394: [ASSEMBLED BY G.M. NEW ZEALAND, CODE XH]
XH8448-275 MFGD. MAY 4 1943
XH8448-377 ENGINE # FR3,863,573 MFGD. MAY 5 1943
XH8448-382 ENGINE # FR3,863,937 MFGD. MAY 5 1943
XH8448-428 MFGD. MAY 5 1943
XH8448-564 MFGD. MAY 5 1943
XH8448-657 ENGINE # FR3,864,068 MFGD. MAY 5 1943
XH8448-718 ENGINE # FR3,864,330 MFGD. JUNE 5 1943
XH8448-834 MFGD. JUNE 5 1943
XH8448-890 MFGD. JUNE 5 1943

However, I am not sure whether the 'June' is correct now. I wonder if they were '6 5-43' and have been misinterprested? I would have said that the maximum was possibly 900, although this assumes that GM NZ started their sequential system with XH8448-1...we need to ensure that there were no other CMPs assembled at the time. I would suggest that the platews were stamped by the GM NZ men on the line, as these would have been blank plates supplied along with the crates of components. On that basis I can understand firstly why different men on a different shift would stamp the way that they thought was correct, and why assembly in June might have been possible. The engines I date to early 1943 at the latest.

However I have one other line of enquiry: knowing the contract number I am going to endeavour to look up the Ministry of Supply record card and see what it says as this should give the information we need!

Last edited by David_Hayward (RIP); 09-02-05 at 11:17.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-02-05, 10:31
Tony Smith's Avatar
Tony Smith Tony Smith is offline
No1, Mk 2** (I'm back!)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lithgow, NSW, Australia
Posts: 5,042
Default Data plates

David, it is June. I have several more pics of C8AX plates but they are on film and I have to sort through them to find them. Here's one of ...870 to keep you happy in the meantime.
Attached Thumbnails
c8ax crossen.jpg  
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-02-05, 10:36
Tony Smith's Avatar
Tony Smith Tony Smith is offline
No1, Mk 2** (I'm back!)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lithgow, NSW, Australia
Posts: 5,042
Default

..-606
Attached Thumbnails
c8ax poll.jpg  
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-02-05, 10:37
Tony Smith's Avatar
Tony Smith Tony Smith is offline
No1, Mk 2** (I'm back!)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lithgow, NSW, Australia
Posts: 5,042
Default

and ..-496
Attached Thumbnails
c8ax reeves.jpg  
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-02-05, 11:16
David_Hayward (RIP)'s Avatar
David_Hayward (RIP) David_Hayward (RIP) is offline
former Resident Historian
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The New Forest, England
Posts: 3,841
Default Great!

Tony, this smells to me as though there were two batches at least and GM NZ assembled them roughly one month apart. The stamping inconsistencies I put down to a) different men and b) whichever stamp was to hand...'5' takes less effort than 'M-a-y' as wel!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-02-05, 19:47
Keith Webb's Avatar
Keith Webb Keith Webb is offline
Film maker, CMP addict
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Macleod, Victoria, Australia
Posts: 8,216
Default Pics

Hey Tony
How about some pics of the trucks they were attached to?
__________________
Film maker

42 FGT No8 (Aust) remains
42 FGT No9 (Aust)
42 F15
Keith Webb
Macleod, Victoria Australia
Also Canadian Military Pattern Vehicles group on Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/groups/canadianmilitarypattern
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-02-05, 14:05
Tony Smith's Avatar
Tony Smith Tony Smith is offline
No1, Mk 2** (I'm back!)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lithgow, NSW, Australia
Posts: 5,042
Default

..-870
Attached Thumbnails
c8ax nx25592.jpg  
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-02-05, 14:07
Tony Smith's Avatar
Tony Smith Tony Smith is offline
No1, Mk 2** (I'm back!)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lithgow, NSW, Australia
Posts: 5,042
Default

..-606
Attached Thumbnails
23a_0002.jpg  
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-02-05, 14:19
Tony Smith's Avatar
Tony Smith Tony Smith is offline
No1, Mk 2** (I'm back!)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lithgow, NSW, Australia
Posts: 5,042
Default

..-496
Attached Thumbnails
c8ax nz25276-2.jpg  
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-02-05, 17:04
David_Hayward (RIP)'s Avatar
David_Hayward (RIP) David_Hayward (RIP) is offline
former Resident Historian
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The New Forest, England
Posts: 3,841
Default Is...

..the last one the Coupe GT version?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-02-05, 17:43
Tony Smith's Avatar
Tony Smith Tony Smith is offline
No1, Mk 2** (I'm back!)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lithgow, NSW, Australia
Posts: 5,042
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by David_Hayward
Is the last one the Coupe GT version?
No, just has a spare Chev Lend Lease cab sitting vertically on the back:
David, you said you suspect that GM NZ may have assembled two batches of C8AX. Do you think it's possible that the whole month's production for, say, April may have been delivered or handed over on 5 May 43 and the following 4 weeks production handed over on 5 June 43? That is, the date is not the actual date of assembly, but delivery? Another possibility is that the date refers to the date that a consignment of CKD kits was received by GM NZ for assembly. I can't see GM NZ assembling hundreds of trucks on one day, having a month off and then assembling another couple of hundred. I think it was more likely to be a continous stream of assembling CKD kits.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-02-05, 22:08
David_Hayward (RIP)'s Avatar
David_Hayward (RIP) David_Hayward (RIP) is offline
former Resident Historian
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The New Forest, England
Posts: 3,841
Default Hmmmm!

Tony, interesting points. I note that there were two dates in April, 4th and 5th, and then a big gap: this would suggest three batches and not just two. In the past I have been investigating CKD exports by GM since 1920, and so far I can see there was a finite capacity of crates that could be fitted in a ship and then after mid-1940 the Canadian government had problems with finding shipping space for CKD crates. Space was at a premium and often crates had to be left behind. I can imagine that although Oshawa produced a large number of crated CKD trucks, and had them railed to Vancouver, shipping constraints and the need to sometimes drop off crates say in Australia, could have resulted in batches arriving independently.

The uncertainty I have with the C8AX assembly is that the 'XH' code applied to all Chevrolets assembled in Petone Plant and they used a sequential number. There could have been other chassis assembled at the same time and the same sequence applied. However, I do understand why the 'manufactured' date could equally be the 'delivered' date. I query whether 300-odd chassis could have been assembled in the Plant in one day!

POSTSCRIPT: I have been looking up my data. In 1920 the largest shipment from the US to that time was 300 crated cars, although it appears that 600 chassis could be shipped in one go. Running forward 20 years, Windsor and Oshawa produced about 125 CMPs each day up to August 1940, and then it was suggested that this could be ramped-up to 200 or so per day.

Last edited by David_Hayward (RIP); 10-02-05 at 22:31.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-05-06, 23:40
Tony Smith's Avatar
Tony Smith Tony Smith is offline
No1, Mk 2** (I'm back!)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lithgow, NSW, Australia
Posts: 5,042
Default

Here's a Red Herring for you, David C8AX No 229 with a build date of 5-3-43. Could the March production be one batch and the May/June be the second batch, or do you think now there might be 3 batches?
Attached Thumbnails
c8axnaish.jpg  
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 04-05-06, 23:43
Tony Smith's Avatar
Tony Smith Tony Smith is offline
No1, Mk 2** (I'm back!)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lithgow, NSW, Australia
Posts: 5,042
Default

And for Keith, here's -229:
Attached Thumbnails
img_2742.jpg  
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 04-05-06, 23:45
Tony Smith's Avatar
Tony Smith Tony Smith is offline
No1, Mk 2** (I'm back!)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lithgow, NSW, Australia
Posts: 5,042
Default

David, in case you didn't update you database, -721 (5 June 43)was photographed by Keith at the Ganmain auction.
Attached Thumbnails
c8ax ganmain.jpg  
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-05-06, 00:11
Tony Smith's Avatar
Tony Smith Tony Smith is offline
No1, Mk 2** (I'm back!)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lithgow, NSW, Australia
Posts: 5,042
Default

To update the list:

These are the sum total of known C8AX chassis:

ALL S/M 2394: [ASSEMBLED BY G.M. NEW ZEALAND, CODE XH]

XH8448-229 ENGINE # FR3863719 MFGD. 5 3 43
XH8448-275 MFGD. 4 MAY 43
XH8448-377 ENGINE # FR3863573 MFGD. 5 5 43
XH8448-382 ENGINE # FR3863937 MFGD. 5 MAY 43
XH8448-428 MFGD. 5 MAY 43
XH8448-496 ENGINE # FR3863872 MFGD. 5 5 43
XH8448-502 ENGINE # FR3863593 MFGD. 5 5 43
XH8448-564 MFGD. 5 MAY 43
XH8448-594 ENGINE # FR3863668 MFGD. 5 MAY 43
XH8448-606 ENGINE # FR3864085 MFGD. 5 MAY 43
XH8448-657 ENGINE # FR3864068 MFGD. 5 MAY 43
XH8448-718 ENGINE # FR3864330 MFGD. 5 JUNE 43
XH8448-721 ENGINE # FR3864172 MFGD. 5 JUNE 43
XH8448-834 MFGD. 5 JUNE 43
XH8448-870 ENGINE # FR38635?4 MFGD. 5 JUNE 43
XH8448-890 MFGD. 5 JUNE 43
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-05-06, 00:15
cliff's Avatar
cliff cliff is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Gympie, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 3,105
Default Re: Hmmmm!

Quote:
Originally posted by David_Hayward
I query whether 300-odd chassis could have been assembled in the Plant in one day!
I seriously doubt whether production exceded 10 to 15 vehicles a day at that time in the Petone plant so Tony's theory about the dates being delivery dates is probably correct.

Cheers
Cliff

Last edited by cliff; 21-08-06 at 11:05.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 05-05-06, 10:59
David_Hayward (RIP)'s Avatar
David_Hayward (RIP) David_Hayward (RIP) is offline
former Resident Historian
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The New Forest, England
Posts: 3,841
Default Thanks!

Thank you Tony! However do I take it that I have noted down incorrectly:

GENERAL MOTORS OF CANADA
CHASSIS MODEL C.15441
CAB MODEL 13
CHASSIS SERIAL XH8448-394
ENGINE SERIAL FR3863668
ORDER 2394
DATE OF MFG 5 MAY 43

which you have as # 594?

I have noted that the date stamping is inconsistent... US and British notation and also the month stated as 'May' or 'June' and '5'...suggesting different personnel added the date on a piecemeal basis? Also it appears from my database that the Cab type is not always stated.

I also think now that the Manufactured date was the date of release for the reason stated.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 05-05-06, 20:39
Ken Hughes's Avatar
Ken Hughes Ken Hughes is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Dunedin New Zealand
Posts: 374
Smile c8ax

229 for your info keith is known as Hurcules, owned by fred naish here in dunedin nz .
__________________
kenney
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 05-05-06, 23:57
Tony Smith's Avatar
Tony Smith Tony Smith is offline
No1, Mk 2** (I'm back!)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lithgow, NSW, Australia
Posts: 5,042
Default Re: Thanks!

Quote:
Originally posted by David_Hayward
Thank you Tony! However do I take it that I have noted down incorrectly:

GENERAL MOTORS OF CANADA
CHASSIS MODEL C.15441
CAB MODEL 13
CHASSIS SERIAL XH8448-394
ENGINE SERIAL FR3863668
ORDER 2394
DATE OF MFG 5 MAY 43

which you have as # 594?
Ahh, yes, we did discuss this one some time ago. Let the members decide, is this -394 or -594?

I have tried to show the database with the date as written on the plate, to differentiate which style was used. I haven't seen "13" noted for cab model on ANY C8AX plate yet, although all C8AX's were 13 cabs.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 06-05-06, 10:35
David_Hayward (RIP)'s Avatar
David_Hayward (RIP) David_Hayward (RIP) is offline
former Resident Historian
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The New Forest, England
Posts: 3,841
Default 594!

# 594 I think...I stared and stared at it and beliveve it may have been a mis-stamping that was done again, and although initially it looks like a 394, I now believe it is 594. Cheers.

Note also the Canadian plates pressed from behind, and Petone plant stamped with a punch or similar onto the blank plates supplied by Oshawa.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 11-05-06, 14:01
Hanno Spoelstra's Avatar
Hanno Spoelstra Hanno Spoelstra is offline
MLU Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 14,400
Default

Another C8AX survivor. Don't know the s/n.

Click image for larger version

Name:	CMP%208.jpg
Views:	4
Size:	74.2 KB
ID:	95807

Source: http://jeepdraw.com/Trailer_Canadian.html

Last edited by Hanno Spoelstra; 20-11-17 at 16:54. Reason: deleted link and attached picture
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 11-05-06, 14:12
Tony Smith's Avatar
Tony Smith Tony Smith is offline
No1, Mk 2** (I'm back!)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lithgow, NSW, Australia
Posts: 5,042
Default

That's -606, shown above. Owned and restored by Arthur Poll.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 11-05-06, 14:17
Hanno Spoelstra's Avatar
Hanno Spoelstra Hanno Spoelstra is offline
MLU Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 14,400
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Tony Smith
That's -606, shown above. Owned and restored by Arthur Poll.
Ah yes, I see it now. Sorry 'bout that, but those CMP's all look the same, don't they

H.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 20-05-06, 01:57
David Hardway David Hardway is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Palmerston North New Zealand
Posts: 92
Default

I started making a list of C8AX chassis numbers a few years ago unfortunately most of the info went with a stolen briefcase however i have just started to try and piece things together again the lowest number being XH8448-067 and the highest being XH8448-903

i will try and post my list asap

Dave

Ford F15A
Universal 3" Mortar Carrier
NZ Pattern Wheeled Carrier
Ford F30 LRDG Replica (Project)
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 20-05-06, 04:19
Tony Smith's Avatar
Tony Smith Tony Smith is offline
No1, Mk 2** (I'm back!)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lithgow, NSW, Australia
Posts: 5,042
Default

That's good, Dave. There were probably only 1000-1200 C8AX produced and a surprisingly large percentage of them still survive today. There's a good chance here to record a lot of info for one of the smallest (literally!) batches of CMP.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 17-08-06, 10:20
Rob Beale Rob Beale is offline
C8AX Ambulance (NZ), UC1*
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Gisborne, New Zealand
Posts: 387
Default

Hi to all, I have a C8AX no 087 with a build date of 5 - 3 - 43. It is the third version of the kiwi puddle jumpers, the "ambulance, 4 stretcher". It was released from the army in the late 1960's, and spent nearly 20 years as a chemical sprayer! I'll post a picture soon, once I get the new canopy fitted. We plan to have all three versions together at the Cambridge Armistice Day commemorations later this year.

New Zealand Army Museum have a data base printout of most of the fleet from the early war years to late 1980's, but it is hardcopy only and is listed by NZ census number only. I have seen it and it records disposal dates, and vehicle type, but NOT the makers serial numbers like chassis no. etc.

I'll get some more C8AX numbers to Dave Hardaway for his list.

Rob Beale
NZ
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 17-08-06, 10:41
David_Hayward (RIP)'s Avatar
David_Hayward (RIP) David_Hayward (RIP) is offline
former Resident Historian
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The New Forest, England
Posts: 3,841
Default Present List

ALL S/M 2394: [ASSEMBLED BY G.M. NEW ZEALAND, CODE XH]
XH8448-067
XH8447-087 MFGD. 5 3 43
XH8448-229 ENGINE # FR3863719 MFGD. 5 3 43
XH8448-275 MFGD. 4 MAY 43
XH8448-377 ENGINE # FR3863573 MFGD. 5 5 43
XH8448-382 ENGINE # FR3863937 MFGD. 5 MAY 43
XH8448-428 MFGD. 5 MAY 43
XH8448-496 ENGINE # FR3863872 MFGD. 5 5 43
XH8448-502 ENGINE # FR3863593 MFGD. 5 5 43
XH8448-564 MFGD. 5 MAY 43
XH8448-594 ENGINE # FR3863668 MFGD. 5 MAY 43
XH8448-606 ENGINE # FR3864085 MFGD. 5 MAY 43
XH8448-657 ENGINE # FR3864068 MFGD. 5 MAY 43
XH8448-718 ENGINE # FR3864330 MFGD. 5 JUNE 43
XH8448-721 ENGINE # FR3864172 MFGD. 5 JUNE 43
XH8448-834 MFGD. 5 JUNE 43
XH8448-870 ENGINE # FR38635?4 MFGD. 5 JUNE 43
XH8448-890 MFGD. 5 JUNE 43
XH8448-903


Do we agree that the '3' and '5' are indedd March and May respectively? Otherwise why would the second digit be so close to the year?

I have concluded that these data plates were all stamped by GM New Zealand Ltd in Petone, and that they arrived CKD. Note that the engine numbers are in no way sequential, and so were dhipped independently from Walkerville and stored around the Plant. Do others agree that we have three batches here at the moment? Whether each batch were actually assembled on the date on the plate I would not like to say..these may have been official dates and could even be delivery dates?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 15:32.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016