MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Softskin Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 20-04-08, 11:07
Kuno Kuno is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Libya... most of the Time
Posts: 536
Default Chevrolet WB Question

Chevrolet WB Question

Dear specialists. Below photograph shows one of the LRDG / T.Patrols Chevrolets which was shot into fire by the Italians in early 1941 at Jebel Sherif.

Together with a colleague from Italy and another one from NZ I was doing research which hopefully leads to the publication of a book during this year.

We know that the Italians did not investigate the burnt trucks before they left the site. Neither did any of the LRDG return to the place. The first patrol coming to the same location was one of the Free French on 9th. February 1941.

There is nowhere an evidence, who may have removed the engines. But a fact is - they were removed.

If you could confirm that in this picture the engine is removed, then we could take this as a strong indication that such has been done by the Free French.

Most helpful would be a reference photo of another WB with an open bonnet.
Attached Thumbnails
Chev.WB - no engine.jpg  
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 20-04-08, 12:21
cliff's Avatar
cliff cliff is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Gympie, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 3,108
Default

mate what is needed is a bigger photo then the thumbnail you have posted. It is hard to tell if the engine has been removed or not due to the shadows and when you blow such a small photo up it distorts.
__________________
Cheers
Cliff Hutchings
aka MrRoo S.I.R.

"and on the 8th day he made trucks so that man, made on the 7th day, had shelter when woman threw him out for the night"
MrRoo says "TRUCKS ROOLE"
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 20-04-08, 18:46
David_Hayward (RIP)'s Avatar
David_Hayward (RIP) David_Hayward (RIP) is offline
former Resident Historian
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The New Forest, England
Posts: 3,841
Default ??

It is difficult to say if the engine is missing or not. I did think I could see it still in place. How whould the FF have removed it without at least a portable hoist? Why would they anyway? Just a thought.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 20-04-08, 19:43
Kuno Kuno is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Libya... most of the Time
Posts: 536
Default

@ Cliff; just click the thumbail and the bigger photo will open.

@ David; a fact is that the engines have been removed. The Italians can be excluded - they did not have Chevrolets down there and there is not the slightest evidence that they had returned to the site.

The G-Patrol and the rest of the T-Patrol did not come to the place any more as well. They went back to Egypt on a route deeper the South.

The Free French came there as the first party after the clash. Although the patrol was driving BEDFORD OY (or something like this), the French had Chevrolets amongst them as well - and they had very long supply lines. So, a reason to remove the engines would have been to win spares...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 20-04-08, 19:43
cletrac (RIP)'s Avatar
cletrac (RIP) cletrac (RIP) is offline
David Pope
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Eston, Sask, Canada
Posts: 2,251
Default

You couldn't remove the engine without taking off the hood and that angled radiator brace.
__________________
1940 Cab 11 C8 Wireless with 1A2 box & 11 set
1940 Cab 11 C8 cab and chassis
1940 Cab 11 C15 with 2A1 & Motley mount & Lewis gun
1940 Cab 11 F15A w/ Chev rear ends
1941 Cab 12 F15A
1942-44 Cab 13 F15A x 5
1942 cab 13 F15A with 2B1 box
1943 cab 13 F15A with 2H1 box
1943 Cab 13 C8A HUP
1944 Cab 13 C15A with 2C1 box
1943 Cletrac M2 High Speed Tractor
MkII Bren gun carrier chassis x 2
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 20-04-08, 20:14
Kuno Kuno is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Libya... most of the Time
Posts: 536
Default

This would mean that if the engine was removed on above picture then the hood etc. should also be removed (nobody would fix it any more at a destroyed truck - except: Think that they were Fench ;-))

Is it this, what you mean?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 20-04-08, 22:43
cliff's Avatar
cliff cliff is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Gympie, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 3,108
Default

Kuno the big photo is not much bigger then the thumbnail but I agree with the others about the bonnet and radiator still being in place means the engine is probably still there as well.
__________________
Cheers
Cliff Hutchings
aka MrRoo S.I.R.

"and on the 8th day he made trucks so that man, made on the 7th day, had shelter when woman threw him out for the night"
MrRoo says "TRUCKS ROOLE"
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 21-04-08, 00:37
Bill Murray Bill Murray is offline
Dog Robber
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Kennesaw (Atlanta, Ga.), USA
Posts: 1,400
Default

Which is not to say that the cylinder head, ancillary stuff etc. could not have been removed.

To my eyes, something is missing but I agree that probably the entire engine block assembly could not be removed from the bottom. On the other hand, that was almost 70 years ago and not many of us have ever removed an engine from a vehicle in the desert.

Bill
__________________
Dog Robber Sends
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 21-04-08, 00:50
cliff's Avatar
cliff cliff is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Gympie, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 3,108
Default

you are correct Bill I think something is missing too. Normally from that angle you would see part of the air cleaner and carby sticking up at least but looking at the photo you could be right and the head has been removed. But again it would have been easier to remove it if the bonnet was removed first.
__________________
Cheers
Cliff Hutchings
aka MrRoo S.I.R.

"and on the 8th day he made trucks so that man, made on the 7th day, had shelter when woman threw him out for the night"
MrRoo says "TRUCKS ROOLE"
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 21-04-08, 14:37
Tony Smith's Avatar
Tony Smith Tony Smith is offline
No1, Mk 2** (I'm back!)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lithgow, NSW, Australia
Posts: 5,042
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kuno View Post
Dear specialists. Together with a colleague from Italy and another one from NZ I was doing research which hopefully leads to the publication of a book during this year.
.
(run Threadjacker 2000.exe)
Kuno, does this mean that B O'C will be publishing another LRDG book? And will you have any input to next year's (Apr 09) Egypt trip?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 21-04-08, 22:46
Kuno Kuno is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Libya... most of the Time
Posts: 536
Default

@ Tony; yes, we are working on another publication. Actually not a pure LRDG book since the Italians will play an important role as well this time ;-)

I am not aware about next years April trip - but in the final stages for the planning of this years May trip... ...and I am thinking about this years September trip. Next year is still too far away for me.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 22-04-08, 05:25
Lang Lang is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Brisbane Australia
Posts: 1,661
Default

Kuno,

Just went and looked at my Chev in the backyard from the same angle. I would put money on the engine still being there. You can see the line of the rocker cover. The Chev engines are down low in comparison with the bonnet/hood line. The Carb and Manifolds are on the left side hidden from view.

Lang
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 22-04-08, 08:22
David_Hayward (RIP)'s Avatar
David_Hayward (RIP) David_Hayward (RIP) is offline
former Resident Historian
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The New Forest, England
Posts: 3,841
Default I agree?

I concur with Lang...I am sure that I can see the carb top and that the engine is there. They are low down or were in the civvy 1939-40 truck models. I would have thought that the FF would have removed anything and everything if they could. I can imagine that distributor, air filter, plugs, etc. would have been taken as they would have been easily removed.

I may be wrong though and just suggest that it appears to me as though the engine is still there. It is however difficult to tell and the suggestion that the FF would have wanted any parts is plausible. I have no idea if they had the facility to remove that engine though without a portable hoist.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 22-04-08, 09:32
ccooperaus ccooperaus is offline
Charlie
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Tallebudgera, Qld, Aus
Posts: 42
Default

Hello all.

It would seem the radiator is still in place. Be nigh impossible to remove engine with it still there?

Charlie
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 22-04-08, 09:49
Kuno Kuno is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Libya... most of the Time
Posts: 536
Default

Ok; your arguments have convinced me. The engines were NOT removed by the French. Actually their report does not mention anything like this but the assumption was brought up by Winston Churchill (the Gradson of the other one) whilst he saw the wreck in the early 1960ies.

Thanks again for your assistance!
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 27-04-08, 18:52
Kuno Kuno is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Libya... most of the Time
Posts: 536
Default

Sorry, I made a mistake: It's a WA not a WB .
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 16:35.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016