MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Softskin Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-08-16, 18:57
cliff's Avatar
cliff cliff is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Gympie, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 3,105
Default More Marmon Herrington Questions

I have a few more questions about some photos of Ford Marmon Herrington trucks which I hope someone can answer for me.

The first is the 3 trucks in Syria 1941. All are M/H's but they appear to be tractor units with semi-trailers. Would these have been a full length (134in or 158in) chassis OR a special wheelbase of their own?

The second shows Ford Roadster cab 6X6 M/H in 1945 titled "WONGABEL, QLD. 1945. TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY COY TRUCKS".
Now what would have been the wheelbase of these and the total chassis rail length?

Both photos are from the AWM
Attached Images
  
__________________
Cheers
Cliff Hutchings
aka MrRoo S.I.R.

"and on the 8th day he made trucks so that man, made on the 7th day, had shelter when woman threw him out for the night"
MrRoo says "TRUCKS ROOLE"
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-08-16, 19:10
Allan Currey's Avatar
Allan Currey Allan Currey is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Wollongong, Australia
Posts: 36
Default Partial answer

I don't know about the three in Syria, so can't help there, but I'd like to know too!
My guess for the 6x6 MH Fords is that they are on the same chassis as the 6x6 ACV prototypes, which I believe were on a Ford 11T 156 inch wheelbase. I stand to be corrected, of course.
The 156 inch measurement comes from an article on the ACVs written years ago by Paul Handel. I think 158 inches is the 4x2 chassis, not sure why a 6x6 would be shorter.
Cheers,
Allan

Last edited by Allan Currey; 05-08-16 at 19:27. Reason: Additional information
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-08-16, 14:20
Tony Smith's Avatar
Tony Smith Tony Smith is offline
No1, Mk 2** (I'm back!)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lithgow, NSW, Australia
Posts: 5,042
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Allan Currey View Post
My guess for the 6x6 MH Fords is that they are on the same chassis as the 6x6 ACV prototypes, which I believe were on a Ford 11T 156 inch wheelbase. I stand to be corrected, of course.
The 156 inch measurement comes from an article on the ACVs written years ago by Paul Handel. I think 158 inches is the 4x2 chassis, not sure why a 6x6 would be shorter.
Cheers,
Allan
The "wheelbase" for a tandem pair of rear axles is measured to the centre of the pair of axles. If you look closely at the pics re-posted by Cliff in the Thornton-Welles diff thread, you will see that the tailshaft from the Transfer Case is the same used in the 4x2/4x4 truck, but the length of the pinion onto the T-W drive splitter is shorter than the pinion of a Ford Differential, my guess would be 2in shorter. This would move the centreline of the T-W drivesplitter/tandem bogie assembly 2in forward of the single Ford Truck rear axle.
__________________
You can help Keep Mapleleafup Up! See Here how you can help, and why you should!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-08-16, 00:39
cliff's Avatar
cliff cliff is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Gympie, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 3,105
Default

According to Bart's " The Observers Fighting Vehicle Directory"

1942 front end (Jail bar) Ford #3A, 3 ton, 6X6, Breakdown (Aust) - (Ford/Marmon Herrington 296T) has a 156in WB and overall is 290in Long X 98in wide and 118in high. Also fitted with a soft top cab. 10.50 X 18 tyres and Australian type spring bumper.

The 1941 was designated as a #3

Reading this I believe the 1941 may have the same WB and dimensions. Am I correct?
__________________
Cheers
Cliff Hutchings
aka MrRoo S.I.R.

"and on the 8th day he made trucks so that man, made on the 7th day, had shelter when woman threw him out for the night"
MrRoo says "TRUCKS ROOLE"
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-08-16, 07:15
Allan Currey's Avatar
Allan Currey Allan Currey is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Wollongong, Australia
Posts: 36
Default

Thanks for the clarification Tony. I see what you mean with the length of the drive shaft into the splitter. That makes sense to me.
So is it right to say there have been two versions of 6 wheel drive used on Aussie Ford MH trucks? The Thornton-Welles as you describe, and also the type using a Timken double pinion splitter mounted on the forward of the rear axles? And would the Timken type also be a 156"wb?

Cheers,
Allan
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
For Sale: Marmon-Herrington wayne lane For Sale Or Wanted 2 21-10-11 07:12
Marmon Herrington ron The Armour Forum 0 17-05-10 04:05
Marmon Herrington For Sale In Oz Bob Moseley (RIP) For Sale Or Wanted 2 16-11-06 01:43
Ford/Marmon-Herrington MGT's nuyt The Softskin Forum 122 27-12-05 19:42
Marmon Herrington Kuno The Armour Forum 0 16-02-04 18:32


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 20:00.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016