MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Softskin Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 27-04-03, 15:48
Geoff Winnington-Ball (RIP)'s Avatar
Geoff Winnington-Ball (RIP) Geoff Winnington-Ball (RIP) is offline
former OC MLU, AKA 'Jif' - sadly no longer with us
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,400
Default Question for you Aussies

Just who coined the term 'blitz' as it applies to CMP trucks? We know what "The Blitz" was, but how and when did the word become the universal nickname for the vehicle?
__________________
SUNRAY SENDS AND ENDS
:remember :support
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 27-04-03, 20:08
David_Hayward (RIP)'s Avatar
David_Hayward (RIP) David_Hayward (RIP) is offline
former Resident Historian
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The New Forest, England
Posts: 3,841
Default Blitz

The word actually means "lightning" in German. It was first used on the Opel truck range in 1931 when the name was picked out from a workers' competition in the Russelsheim factory. It was meant to signify "speed", and equipped with the 1930 Model Marquette L-head engine they were not slow! The name was in fact used continuosuly for all civilian and military Opel trucks right up to 1944, and then post-war as well. It seems that the name was used up into the Seventies when Opel sold Bedford Blitz trucks...so there was no concern at the other meanings of the word.

The term "blitzkrieg" meant "lightning war", and the term "blitz" somehow became adopted and adapated in the UK to mean "mass bombing" as "in the Blitz", probably as a contraction of "blitzkrieg" in the sense that aerial warfare by bombing was part of the German attack plan with armoured vehicles. It then seems that CMP trucks became known as "Blitz Buggies" in Australia, and I assume, and hope someone will correct me, because of their wartime order and use in military action.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 28-04-03, 03:22
Ian Fawbert Ian Fawbert is offline
Jeep guy in CMP world!
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Sydney, Australia.
Posts: 340
Default

Hi geoff,
i cant tell you where it started, but i`ve always known them as blitz`s and so have my parents. i`d say its like david said, it evolved from blitz buggy, but its an interesting one, someone should know.

Cheers,

Ian.
__________________
Ian Fawbert

1942 Script Willys MB, sn:131175
1942 Script Ford GPW, sn:11730
1944 Ford GPW
1943 #3 GMH jeep trailer
1945 #4 GMH, RAAF jeep Trailer
SOLD: Ford F15A. Aust. #? Office Body.
www.vintageengines.net
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 28-04-03, 05:21
Keith Webb's Avatar
Keith Webb Keith Webb is offline
Film maker, CMP addict
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Macleod, Victoria, Australia
Posts: 8,216
Default Blitz

I think it is derived partly from our spirit of irreverance - the term as it relates to CMPs was first used in the Western Desert where they were called Desert Blitzes and some old timers still call the Cab 11 and 12 shape that name.
The term Blitz Buggy was also used for the early Jeeps but didn't stick.
Back in Australia this has been the colloquial term for CMPs ever since the war.
Variations are:
Desert Blitz
Blitz Buggy
Blitz Wagon
or just plain Blitz.

I have also heard the International Harvester ACCO called the Inter Blitz or ACCO Blitz because they have a similar shape and purpose, and were to an extent a development of the CMP for the Australian Army.
__________________
Film maker

42 FGT No8 (Aust) remains
42 FGT No9 (Aust)
42 F15
Keith Webb
Macleod, Victoria Australia
Also Canadian Military Pattern Vehicles group on Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/groups/canadianmilitarypattern
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 25-05-03, 16:41
jpduvey jpduvey is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Canberra ACT Australia
Posts: 8
Default

G'day Gentlemen

Keith is correct the word "Blitz" is German for lightning.

My reasearch into the use of the name Blitz for Aussie CMP's revealed a rather interesting "yarn".

An old "digger" (returned serviceman), related this story to me and I have no reason to doubt his word.

Apparently during the desert campaigns Australian Forces were issued only with militarized-civilian trucks such as Fords Dodges and Chevs. These vehicles although able to cope with the harsh conditions with minor alteration, could not keep pace with the Opel's mentioned in David Haywards posting.

Eventually as the CMP's became available the Aussie boys said "these will have their blitzes buggered"

Later this simply became Blitz Bugger-ers or Blitz Buggies.

With mention to the Aussie ACCO's

Here in is another story (Will begin another posting)

Jean Du Vey
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 25-05-03, 17:36
Mike Kelly's Avatar
Mike Kelly Mike Kelly is offline
Fan of Lord Nuffield
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Victoria Australia
Posts: 5,623
Default Opel Blitz faster ?

I am not doubting Jeans interesting story , its probably true , as it's the best explantion I have heard so far .

But, I cannot see how the Opel Blitz with a 68 BHP 3.6 litre engine would be faster than a modified conventional Ford or Chev civvy truck . Maybe the 5 speed gearbox of the Opel was the reason .


Mike
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 26-05-03, 11:33
David_Hayward (RIP)'s Avatar
David_Hayward (RIP) David_Hayward (RIP) is offline
former Resident Historian
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The New Forest, England
Posts: 3,841
Default One word answer...

"Autobahnen"...the Opel cars and trucks were all blessed with the requirement that they had to be able to speed consistently at high revs, and not blow up. Although Bart V mentions "68" bhp for the 3.6 litre engine, my information has it that it was 79 bhp, with 4 x 2 drive of course, and an engine that was based on the 1937 Chevrolet but with all the bugs ironed out. They could thus be expected to keep up fast speeds consistently. However whether the rarer Allrad version of the Blitz was much slower because of the extra transmission is arguable.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 26-05-03, 14:24
Hanno Spoelstra's Avatar
Hanno Spoelstra Hanno Spoelstra is offline
MLU Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 14,435
Default The Grass Is Greener On The Other Side

Quote:
Originally posted by Mike Kelly
But, I cannot see how the Opel Blitz with a 68 BHP 3.6 litre engine would be faster than a modified conventional Ford or Chev civvy truck .
Well, isn't often the case the enemy's equipment is perceived to be better in every aspect? The Allied soldiers always complained the German tanks were much better protected and armed and had better mobility than their own. But on the other hand there were reports that "the Sherman tank's ... terrain-crossing ability ... is completely superior to our Panzers".

Of course there often was a source of truth - ask any veteran who had several tanks knocked out under him if it's true if there's fire when you see smoke - but I would not be surprised if the "The Grass Is Greener On The Other Side Syndrome" helped to name the Blitz.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 23:27.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016