MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > GENERAL WW2 TOPICS > WW2 Military History & Equipment

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 21-09-09, 18:30
Bill Miller's Avatar
Bill Miller Bill Miller is offline
Son of Kangaroo Trooper
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Calgary, AB Canada
Posts: 162
Question WW2 Rank appointments

The past week or so I have been tabulating some nominal roll information and it has made me curious as to what exactly were the subtle differences between:

Acting Lance Corporal > L/Cpl > A/Cpl
Acting Lance Sergeant > L/Sgt > A/Sgt

Forgive me, but from my civilian background, these "intermediate" appointments seem kinda pointless. A title (and presumably responsibility) without a pay increase? I see many of these same men were also granted reversions "at their own request".

Thanks,
Bill.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 21-09-09, 20:31
malcolm erik bogaert malcolm erik bogaert is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Berwick on Tweed on the English/Scottish Border.
Posts: 491
Default wartime ranks

as far as I know a lance sgt was a rank perculiar to the Guards regiments regards malcolm
__________________
mally B
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 21-09-09, 20:57
Clive_Dakers Clive_Dakers is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 69
Default

Acting rank is a temporary rank assigned to a person who is performing the duties normally performed by someone of higher rank. He receives pay and conditions appropriate to the higher rank.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-10-09, 16:49
Rob MacDonald Rob MacDonald is offline
Seaforthpiper
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 54
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clive_Dakers View Post
Acting rank is a temporary rank assigned to a person who is performing the duties normally performed by someone of higher rank. He receives pay and conditions appropriate to the higher rank.
I remember 'acting' positions as being temporary appointments to fill a temp. vacancy, but with no increase in pay.

'Lance Corporal' has been described as the worst job in the Army (to which I can personally attest - there is a short sharp learning-curve!), and although the posn of 'L/Sgt' was extinct by my day I understood it to be a probationary position that the soldier could be 'reduced' from without stigma if he proved unequal to the task.

At least that's how it was in the Seaforths.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 14-10-09, 22:53
klambie klambie is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 75
Default Re: Ranks/Appointments

Also a civilian who has struggled with understanding how this stuff worked. Changes since the end of the war, variations for Guards, Rifles etc. units just make it more complex. So with a grain of salt, my understanding for the Second World War as follows:
  • Acting Rank had the pay and allowances of the rank
  • Brevet Rank did not have the pay and allowances of the rank (I've never encountered a real example of a Brevet rank
  • Appointment to an acting rank could be temporary (either by planning, by unsuitability of the soldier, by request of the soldier) or could be made permanent through confirmation in the higher rank. I've heard 3 months as the period in which you had to do the job before being confirmed.
  • L/Sgt was also used by Rifle regiments, with half the detachments in the A/Tk and Mortar platoons being commanded by a L/Sgt (the other half by a Sgt)

Bear in mind that in the Second World War, rank structure within a unit was fixed (ie. there were a static number of Cpls allowed), so you only got promoted to fill a gap in a higher rank. In a rifle platoon, a man promoted to Cpl was promoted in order to lead a section, not simply to reflect his experience, etc. While I am sure it is not entirely correct, my broad understanding of the current CF is that ranks like Cpl or M/Cpl are as reflective of time in as much as responsibility, though I admit to ignorance of how the intersection of seniority and responsibility is resolved.
__________________
Kevin Lambie
www.reginarifles.ca
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 15-10-09, 07:31
sapper740's Avatar
sapper740 sapper740 is offline
Derek Heuring
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Corinth, Texas
Posts: 2,018
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by klambie View Post
While I am sure it is not entirely correct, my broad understanding of the current CF is that ranks like Cpl or M/Cpl are as reflective of time in as much as responsibility, though I admit to ignorance of how the intersection of seniority and responsibility is resolved.
My experience in the C.F. is somewhat dated, as I last served in 2001, but I don't think much has changed to date. The rank of Corporal is achieved as a result of two things: time in and training. There isn't a whole lot of official responsibility devolving from being a Corporal, at least in the Engineers as we called ourselves "Glorified Privates" and worked hand-in-hand with both Privates (Untrained) and Privates (Trained) without anyone ever pulling rank. As you had completed your "Fives" (Qualification Level 5) as a Corporal you were expected to be skilled enough in you MOC to be left alone and run a small crew. You got your "Threes" and your "Fives" at CFSME (Canadian Forces School of Military Engineering) which was in CFB Chilliwack when I went through and is now in CFB Gagetown. To become Master Corporal, you had to be a Corporal, completed your JLC (Junior Leadership Course) and there had to be an opening for that rank and your MOC in your unit. As a Master Corporal your responsibilities increased: you could bring charges against a Private or Corporal, were expected to know Drill commands, and could be asked to handle money, such as the taking of cash at mess functions and were now able to become a certified Range Officer.

CHIMO! Derek.
__________________
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 15-10-09, 14:20
malcolm erik bogaert malcolm erik bogaert is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Berwick on Tweed on the English/Scottish Border.
Posts: 491
Default rank

my last OC was appointed Brevet Lt.Col...but didnt get any extra pay or allowances...as at the time our Regiment was the underdog of the MOD....nice to see that things have at last changed and we are now top of the tree!Long Live the Pratorian Guard!!! regards malcolm
__________________
mally B
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 23:00.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016