MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > Post-war Military Vehicles

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 24-04-16, 02:29
Clint Tauber's Avatar
Clint Tauber Clint Tauber is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Masset, BC, Canada
Posts: 80
Exclamation Safety Warning for M-38A1 Owners

Just a reminder to check your tie rod ends carefully. I had one pull out of the rod last summer, which, on closer inspection, turned out to be an M38 end. Someone, at some point, replaced the end with the wrong one, which actually held for a looong time with the clamp tightened to the max! Luckily, it pulled out when I wasn't on a very sharp corner. It wasn't a fun experience, I have since replaced everything. Only the driver's side end was incorrect. Something to watch out for, though, you just never know!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 24-04-16, 03:39
rob love rob love is online now
carrier mech
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Shilo MB, the armpit of Canada
Posts: 7,521
Default

I have owned and been working with M38s and M38A1s for 40 years now. I have never seen anybody so sloppy as to put the smaller thread tie rod into the larger diameter tube. In this day and age of do it yourself, there are some people who should be paying for labour, or at a minimum, asking questions when something doesn't seem quite right.

I did have a similar experience with a CJ7 back in the 80s. I had been driving on the highway at 100 kmh the day before. Next day, the ex took the jeep and turning onto the road, the tie rod came out of the tube. The vehicle was an ex-Ontario vehicle, and at that point was just 8 years old. Turns out the clamp bolt had failed. We don't see corrosion like that here in Manitoba.....8 years is still not half life for a truck in this province.

The next year I spotted a crack in the frame, and a month later the side frame actually split. When I went to rebuild the jeep, I actually removed the rollbar without using any tools.

I have never bought another Ontario vehicle again, other than a Bren carrier which sure enough needed pinholes patched n the floor.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 24-04-16, 04:27
Clint Tauber's Avatar
Clint Tauber Clint Tauber is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Masset, BC, Canada
Posts: 80
Default

Indeed, it never even occurred to me that someone would use the wrong tie-rod end. When I picked the jeep up the first things I checked were the rod ends, to see if they were near failure. Everything was tight, except the bellcrank. I had just completed the repair of the bellcrank, and was road testing the jeep, when the rod came apart. I had to haywire it together and drive home verrry slowly.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 24-04-16, 05:07
chris vickery's Avatar
chris vickery chris vickery is offline
3RD ECHELON WKSP
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Nipissing Ontario Canada
Posts: 2,958
Default

Here is some food for thought on the subject...
I have often heard of guys wanting "dummy" safeties or ones from dubious mechanics. This is very illegal firstly and secondly it is literally taking your life in your hands.
I would rather have a mechanic tell me what is wrong rather than overlook serious or life threatening conditions.
On my first M38A1 which is not complete yet, I rebuild and replaced all of the suspension components due to the fact that everything was in roughy shape.
New springs, shackles, shocks, tie rod ends, tires brakes etc.
Another place guys cheap out on is electrical systems. Why spend all that time and money to restore you vehicle and then leave a 50 year old cobbled up wire harness in it just waiting for an electrical fire.
__________________
3RD Echelon Wksp

1968 M274A5 Mule Baifield USMC
1966 M274A2 Mule BMY USMC
1958 M274 Mule Willys US Army
1970 M38A1 CDN3 70-08715 1 CSR
1981 MANAC 3/4T CDN trailer
1943 Converto Airborne Trailer
1983 M1009 CUCV

RT-524, PRC-77s,
and trucks and stuff and more stuff and and.......

OMVA, MVPA, G503, Steel Soldiers
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 24-04-16, 05:53
Clint Tauber's Avatar
Clint Tauber Clint Tauber is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Masset, BC, Canada
Posts: 80
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chris vickery View Post
Here is some food for thought on the subject...
I have often heard of guys wanting "dummy" safeties or ones from dubious mechanics. This is very illegal firstly and secondly it is literally taking your life in your hands.
I would rather have a mechanic tell me what is wrong rather than overlook serious or life threatening conditions.
On my first M38A1 which is not complete yet, I rebuild and replaced all of the suspension components due to the fact that everything was in roughy shape.
New springs, shackles, shocks, tie rod ends, tires brakes etc.
Another place guys cheap out on is electrical systems. Why spend all that time and money to restore you vehicle and then leave a 50 year old cobbled up wire harness in it just waiting for an electrical fire.
I actually had a mechanic look over the front end at one point, he gave it a clean bill of health, other than the bellcrank. It was impossible to notice unless you actually suspected the wrong tie rod end, in which case you would scrutinize it more carefully. The jeep in question was used on a farm for 40+ years and came straight from the Army, and if I were to point fingers, I would say it came from the Army with the wrong end. The old guy that owned it saved every receipt for every part he ever bought, and kept meticulous notes on everything he did. His only work on the front end was adding an aftermarket steering stabilizer. He even saved every old part that he removed, and included all the junk with the jeep.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 25-04-16, 03:46
chris vickery's Avatar
chris vickery chris vickery is offline
3RD ECHELON WKSP
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Nipissing Ontario Canada
Posts: 2,958
Default

Wow, I am at a loss for words.
__________________
3RD Echelon Wksp

1968 M274A5 Mule Baifield USMC
1966 M274A2 Mule BMY USMC
1958 M274 Mule Willys US Army
1970 M38A1 CDN3 70-08715 1 CSR
1981 MANAC 3/4T CDN trailer
1943 Converto Airborne Trailer
1983 M1009 CUCV

RT-524, PRC-77s,
and trucks and stuff and more stuff and and.......

OMVA, MVPA, G503, Steel Soldiers
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 25-04-16, 05:09
rob love rob love is online now
carrier mech
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Shilo MB, the armpit of Canada
Posts: 7,521
Default

Onr of the problems I had noticed in the 80s when I worked on the Jeeps in service was that the Canadian manual covered all the Jeeps from the M38, the M38A1, and then had an added section for the M38A1Cdn2 and another for the M38A1CDN3.

If you went to the steering seciton for parts, and were not careful to look at the "used on" column, it was easy to end up with the skinny tie rods. All the Cdn2 and Cdn3 were the heavier ends. If the parts guy ordered the complete tie rod (2 ends, the tube and the clamps) as an assembly, we could put that on. But if they just ordered the skinny threaded end, we had to toss it.

Same thing would happen for the fuel tanks, and even the engines. I guess so many people ordered the wrong fuel tanks, they actually made up more M38 tanks in the 80s to fill the demands, even though they were the wrong tanks for the existing fleet. The flathead engines were still around to replace the WW2 engines in the older generator trailers.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 26-04-16, 00:23
Clint Tauber's Avatar
Clint Tauber Clint Tauber is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Masset, BC, Canada
Posts: 80
Default

I found it really odd that only one tie rod end was wrong, too. Whenever I have replaced them, I always do the whole set at the same time. Whatever the case, I have replaced the whole lot now, and threw away the hokey add on steering stabilizer.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 26-04-16, 02:53
rob love rob love is online now
carrier mech
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Shilo MB, the armpit of Canada
Posts: 7,521
Default

We only changed what needed changing in the military. The vehicles got 4 inspections a year back then (2 majors and 2 minors) so when the next one went you would catch it soon enough. Bellcranks were always a losing proposition, followed by the center tie rod, which did the work for both wheels.

Alignments were done with a string, or if you were lucky you had the measuring rod.

Things were pretty primitive back then in the CF.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 27-04-16, 00:00
Clint Tauber's Avatar
Clint Tauber Clint Tauber is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Masset, BC, Canada
Posts: 80
Default

Things were pretty primitive back then in the CF.[/QUOTE]

I don't doubt it, the camo on my old M-37 looked like house paint applied with a whisk broom.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 27-04-16, 02:42
Frank v R's Avatar
Frank v R Frank v R is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: pefferlaw , ont
Posts: 469
Default Tie Rod

you have been introduced to Bubba ! a very dangerous fellow as you well know now!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wanted: M-38A1 Top Bows, M-100 trailer Clint Tauber For Sale Or Wanted 7 02-05-16 23:39
Safety chris vickery The Sergeants' Mess 31 26-01-16 06:06
Heads Up: 1970 38A1 Cdn 3 peter simundson For Sale Or Wanted 1 10-01-16 21:51
For Sale: M 38A1 Parts Gord Falk For Sale Or Wanted 0 09-09-14 02:49
Safety Awards John McGillivray The Sergeants' Mess 5 29-07-07 12:41


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 17:51.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016