View Single Post
  #10  
Old 16-05-17, 01:51
rob love rob love is offline
carrier mech
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Shilo MB, the armpit of Canada
Posts: 7,594
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael R. View Post
As gunners, it is interesting but understandable given the location, year and purpose of the scheme to note the absence of issue small arms and accessories. Other than ammunition pouches, no helmets, basic pouches, bayonets, sub-machine guns, or sidearm for the 2nd Lt.

Familiarization with the MK-I BREN, but not too familiar. Can you spot the same fault or error remaining in both images of the BREN?
In both images the barrel nut lever is not seated. With an earlier gun than that it would not be possible to fire the gun....there is a small tab on the nut that would block the piston from moving forward. However, since the gun is a mk1m, that safety feature was omitted, and one could be having to head down range slightly to retrieve ones barrel if live firing.

This very thing happened during the sales pitch to the British government by the Brno engineers. The engineer designed the safety feature almost overnight and it was incorporated into the Bren mk1. A lot of superfluous and luxury features were on the mk1, many of which were deleted on the mk1m, and even more deleted for the mk2.

Last edited by rob love; 16-05-17 at 02:12.
Reply With Quote