MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > GENERAL WW2 TOPICS > WW2 Military History & Equipment

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #5  
Old 15-05-17, 03:11
Michael R. Michael R. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,164
Default

As gunners, it is interesting but understandable given the location, year and purpose of the scheme to note the absence of issue small arms and accessories. Other than ammunition pouches, no helmets, basic pouches, bayonets, sub-machine guns, or sidearm for the 2nd Lt.

Familiarization with the MK-I BREN, but not too familiar. Can you spot the same fault or error remaining in both images of the BREN?

Last edited by Michael R.; 15-05-17 at 03:30.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
photo of M152CDN photo lab/Command post KAGA Post-war Military Vehicles 0 09-10-10 16:24
photo id Bruce MacMillan WW2 Military History & Equipment 15 05-01-07 21:20
Photo Frantisek Nachlinger The Softskin Forum 0 03-11-05 19:51
Various equipment photo's for identification and review F95476 WW2 Military History & Equipment 16 06-08-05 19:35
Need Photo of 2 cm Gun Dean Owen WW2 Military History & Equipment 7 18-11-03 16:26


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 20:09.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016