MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Carrier Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 18-04-09, 22:16
Flyingtanker's Avatar
Flyingtanker Flyingtanker is offline
Chris Saunders
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Shearwater, N.S.
Posts: 36
Default Faded Markings

Does anyone want to hazard a guess as to what this word on my glacious plate says?
Attached Thumbnails
DSC05644.jpg  
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 18-04-09, 22:22
Flyingtanker's Avatar
Flyingtanker Flyingtanker is offline
Chris Saunders
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Shearwater, N.S.
Posts: 36
Default

To me the letters i can make out are

W I _ _ E R _ _ _ _ ........

Although I could be mistaken of course, but there is no denying the first letter is "W"
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 18-04-09, 23:33
Brad Mills Brad Mills is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NS, CANADA
Posts: 292
Default

WINTERIZED?

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 19-04-09, 00:04
Bruce Parker (RIP) Bruce Parker (RIP) is offline
GM Fox I
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: SW Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,606
Default Where?

Where exactly on the carrier is the marking? Do you know where has the carrier has been? (ie. only in Canada? Europe? Some post war user?)

I ask because there was an example of a carrier a few years ago (see attached) that had all the stowage stenciled in white, similar to the black stenciling used on the inside of tanks. At the time, there was some discussion whether these marks were factory applied (hence ALL restored carriers should have them) or if they were applied some time later. I sense they are a post-war thing. But, back to your question, if your stencil is a 'stowage' marking, knowing what should be at that location may shed some light.
Attached Thumbnails
Stencils1.jpg  
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 19-04-09, 01:29
Flyingtanker's Avatar
Flyingtanker Flyingtanker is offline
Chris Saunders
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Shearwater, N.S.
Posts: 36
Default

As I said it is on the glacious plate(upper nose) of a Canadian MK 2. I think Brad nailed it, that sounds feasable. Has anyone seen winterized on a carrier before?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 19-04-09, 02:19
Grant Bowker Grant Bowker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 2,321
Default

If the suggestion of Winterized is correct, I think there is some more after the word, possibly the temperature to which it was winterized?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 19-04-09, 06:02
Ledsel's Avatar
Ledsel Ledsel is offline
Taisto Hako-oja
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Myrnam Alberta Canada
Posts: 314
Default lettering

That sounds like it to me.
__________________
Model U.C. NO-2 MK II.*
SERIAL 25680
HULL 24699. LOWER HULL 24742. ENGINE TL-26707-F.
C.D. 2609.
BUILT MAR. 25, 1944.
CT 266677
Former WASP
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 19-04-09, 10:46
Blackpowder44 (RIP) Blackpowder44 (RIP) is offline
John Forsey
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Lyme Regis, England
Posts: 109
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruce Parker View Post
Where exactly on the carrier is the marking? Do you know where has the carrier has been? (ie. only in Canada? Europe? Some post war user?)

I ask because there was an example of a carrier a few years ago (see attached) that had all the stowage stenciled in white, similar to the black stenciling used on the inside of tanks. At the time, there was some discussion whether these marks were factory applied (hence ALL restored carriers should have them) or if they were applied some time later. I sense they are a post-war thing. But, back to your question, if your stencil is a 'stowage' marking, knowing what should be at that location may shed some light.
My carrier had all the stowage places stencilled and it was definitly not done post war. John
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 19-04-09, 15:13
Bruce Parker (RIP) Bruce Parker (RIP) is offline
GM Fox I
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: SW Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,606
Default But do you think...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackpowder44 View Post
My carrier had all the stowage places stencilled and it was definitly not done post war. John
Do you think they were factory applied or at some depot before issue?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 19-04-09, 22:22
Brad Mills Brad Mills is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NS, CANADA
Posts: 292
Default Storage...

My take on it would be post war while the vast number of vehicles were in storage and lovingly cared for until needed again or someone figured out what to do with all the surplus.

The Norwegian carrier with all the stencils marked on it that Bruce posted a photo of may have been stenciled as to point out to the new owners what everything was for. Was there not a drive on selling equipment close to or at the end of the war to countries such as China, Norway, Belgium etc.? Or was that just Foreign aid?

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 20-04-09, 09:28
Neil Ashley Neil Ashley is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Trowbridge, England
Posts: 748
Default

My Mk11* is fully stenciled up as well.

Most surviving British sourced Mk11* Carriers came out of crates post-war suggesting a factory application.

Perhaps it was just for carriers produced on British contracts.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 14:49.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016