MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Carrier Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 29-03-10, 03:31
barriefield-brian barriefield-brian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Kingston Ontario
Posts: 75
Default Carrier Pics

Here is a few pics of 8th recce carriers. Numbers 13372 and CT 2015 can be seen. The first pic is in training in England, the rest in Europe. Cheers Brian
Attached Thumbnails
charley3.jpg   marshalling.jpg   marshalling2.jpg   flood.jpg  
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 29-03-10, 16:37
rob love rob love is offline
carrier mech
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Shilo MB, the armpit of Canada
Posts: 7,594
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by barriefield-brian View Post
Here is a few pics of 8th recce carriers. Numbers 13372 and CT 2015 can be seen. The first pic is in training in England, the rest in Europe. Cheers Brian
The carrier is a Mk2 so would have a much higher CT number than that. I see more numbers following what you read, to give "CT201513"
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 30-03-10, 20:53
RichardT10829's Avatar
RichardT10829 RichardT10829 is offline
Richard Harrison
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cullercoats Newcastle Upon Tyne United Kingdom
Posts: 3,068
Default

curious i would have thought that too but its in Nigels lists CT199801 - 201800 UC Mk1 (2000 made) contract no. CDLV1518 by ford Canada perhaps they were retro fitted with the after mods, bit like the "Face Lift" as described in David Fletchers book, they did change to round bar on the armour and different stowage on Mk1's during the war.
__________________
is mos redintegro

__5th Div___46th Div__
1942 Ford Universal Carrier No.3 MkI*
Lower Hull No. 10131
War Department CT54508 (SOLD)
1944 Ford Universal Carrier MkII* (under restoration).
1944 Morris C8 radio body (under restoration).
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 30-03-10, 22:00
Lynn Eades Lynn Eades is offline
Bluebell
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand
Posts: 5,541
Default MkI verses MKII

This carrier is in the last 300 of that 2000 order. When the order was made it was for MKI's, but it may have been that the change to MKII's took place during production of that order. I would doubt that conversion took place afterwards, in Europe.
__________________
Bluebell

Carrier Armoured O.P. No1 Mk3 W. T84991
Carrier Bren No2.Mk.I. NewZealand Railways. NZR.6.
Dodge WC55. 37mm Gun Motor Carriage M6
Jeep Mb #135668
So many questions....
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 31-03-10, 11:54
Phill Phill is offline
Philip
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Belleville
Posts: 75
Default

Is it a Boys rifle in the first picture? Looks very impressive. I'm curious about mounting one of these and the cost to buy a deac Boys. Phil
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 31-03-10, 15:57
rob love rob love is offline
carrier mech
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Shilo MB, the armpit of Canada
Posts: 7,594
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phill View Post
Is it a Boys rifle in the first picture? Looks very impressive. I'm curious about mounting one of these and the cost to buy a deac Boys. Phil
Boys rifles in Canada are very few and far between. That is for live ones. Deactivated are even harder to come by, and with the price of a working one, you sure don't want to e deactivating it.

If you find a Boys rifle in Canada for under 4 grand, run, don't walk, to the bank to get the money. More likely you will be paying in the $5500 to 7K range. Even in the US, where they are easier to come by, the price on them has reached beyond these guidelines. They are also not exportable from the US, unless you are a military or police department, or a military museum. I managed to get mine from the US just as these regs were being tightened up.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 31-03-10, 17:03
RichardT10829's Avatar
RichardT10829 RichardT10829 is offline
Richard Harrison
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cullercoats Newcastle Upon Tyne United Kingdom
Posts: 3,068
Default

BLIMEY !! seriously though Rob that is Mental, mind i can understand about who can have them after all an anti tank weapon can do some damage to a squad car guess mine wont be having the Boys rifle then unless i can successfully drive my carrier through the plate glass entrance at Leeds armouries, but then if i did that i would go for the mini gun and have myself a Minigun Carrier Universal Mk1 No.1. hehehhe
__________________
is mos redintegro

__5th Div___46th Div__
1942 Ford Universal Carrier No.3 MkI*
Lower Hull No. 10131
War Department CT54508 (SOLD)
1944 Ford Universal Carrier MkII* (under restoration).
1944 Morris C8 radio body (under restoration).
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 31-03-10, 18:10
Stewart Loy Stewart Loy is offline
T-16, C15A
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Out in the woods near Woodstock, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 884
Default Boyes?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phill View Post
Is it a Boys rifle in the first picture? Looks very impressive. I'm curious about mounting one of these and the cost to buy a deac Boys. Phil
Don't waste your time with a boys (pun intended) rifle - get a .50, like in the flood photo.

To see what this looks like on a T-16, please reference the latest issue of the MVPA Army Motors. M2 dewats are $5K, by the time a mount, cover, and all the 'bits' make it to your machine. You will need a friend to help - as they are a 'heavy' machine gun!


Stewart
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-04-10, 13:03
Phill Phill is offline
Philip
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Belleville
Posts: 75
Default

It does look more impressive, so was the Browning often mounted on the carrier and were the base mounts made specifically for it? I do have a fondness for the British gun, however, and would like to mount one or the other. Phil
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-04-10, 13:39
RichardT10829's Avatar
RichardT10829 RichardT10829 is offline
Richard Harrison
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cullercoats Newcastle Upon Tyne United Kingdom
Posts: 3,068
Default

I like the MMG carriers with the Vickers mounted on the top engine cover, they look awesome.
__________________
is mos redintegro

__5th Div___46th Div__
1942 Ford Universal Carrier No.3 MkI*
Lower Hull No. 10131
War Department CT54508 (SOLD)
1944 Ford Universal Carrier MkII* (under restoration).
1944 Morris C8 radio body (under restoration).
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-04-10, 17:48
barriefield-brian barriefield-brian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Kingston Ontario
Posts: 75
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phill View Post
It does look more impressive, so was the Browning often mounted on the carrier and were the base mounts made specifically for it? I do have a fondness for the British gun, however, and would like to mount one or the other. Phil
8th Recce fellows told me they traded Lugers and /or whiskey for .50's. The more firepower the better. Brian
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-04-10, 18:24
Phill Phill is offline
Philip
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Belleville
Posts: 75
Default

Interesting stories talking to veterans. Anyone have a modern close-up picture of either gun mounted? Isn't the Boys on the prohibited list? Phil
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-04-10, 21:04
rob love rob love is offline
carrier mech
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Shilo MB, the armpit of Canada
Posts: 7,594
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phill View Post
Interesting stories talking to veterans. Anyone have a modern close-up picture of either gun mounted? Isn't the Boys on the prohibited list? Phil
Boys is non-restricted in Canada, same as any bolt action hunting rifle.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-04-10, 23:10
RichardT10829's Avatar
RichardT10829 RichardT10829 is offline
Richard Harrison
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cullercoats Newcastle Upon Tyne United Kingdom
Posts: 3,068
Default

Can you imagine the mess it would make if you shot a moose with it .... baboosh
__________________
is mos redintegro

__5th Div___46th Div__
1942 Ford Universal Carrier No.3 MkI*
Lower Hull No. 10131
War Department CT54508 (SOLD)
1944 Ford Universal Carrier MkII* (under restoration).
1944 Morris C8 radio body (under restoration).
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-04-10, 01:54
Phill Phill is offline
Philip
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Belleville
Posts: 75
Default

Yes the moose would be done for. I think my carrier will have to have one, maybe I should start looking. Phil
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 02-04-10, 03:06
charlie fitton's Avatar
charlie fitton charlie fitton is offline
HLIofC - Normandy Pl
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Maryhill Ontario
Posts: 943
Default boyes' rifle

Here's a few shots of our carrier with the boyes' mounted, (and some not).

The Ottawa events were a real hoot. Nothing, absolutely nothing, can beat being in a line of carriers and other trucks rolling down the fourlane at a fast idle in top gear.

When mounted, the bipod rests against the angle iron "splash rail" mounted across the front of the carrier. The butt rests in a clip, or we tie it in place with a bit of twine.

Although it gets carried a lot, it gets used little. I plan on making a set of chamber/ sub cal adapters so we can popm off a few blanks with it, but that isn't too high on the list of priorities...

(sorry - thought I had more photo's here...)

The second photo shows a fuel/water can holder in front of the driver. That was wrecked when the driver of a quad-runner decided to test how hard the armour was.

3 and 4 are from the Windsor show last year.

More when I can find the sepias' from Ottawa
Attached Thumbnails
lance in Goderich w carrier.jpg   belangers butt w carrier.jpg  
Attached Images
  
__________________
Charles Fitton
Maryhill On.,
Canada

too many carriers
too many rovers
not enough time.
(and now a BSA...)
(and now a Triumph TRW...)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 10:00.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016