MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Carrier Forum

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #7  
Old 20-12-14, 11:58
Hanno Spoelstra's Avatar
Hanno Spoelstra Hanno Spoelstra is offline
MLU Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 14,868
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron Pier View Post
I don't think there is anything cast in stone here. The bridging classifications will depend on the theatre of operation and how the engineers have defined the bridges.
Can't agree on that. It was "cast in stone" as there were plenty of regulations and instructions, see the link to the web page. Yes, there were differences in how these were interpreted and applied, so in practice it could differ from army policy.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Vehicle signs for bridge weight rating Spurrat WW2 Military History & Equipment 5 11-10-11 20:16
Tac Sign chris vickery Post-war Military Vehicles 4 23-01-11 17:59
Where did the sign in bar go? Phil Waterman TAC HQ 1 28-02-07 21:57
Bridge Class Sign Garry Shipton (RIP) The Softskin Forum 27 30-04-06 00:47
div sign Max Hedges The Softskin Forum 16 29-01-05 21:46


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 23:21.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016