|
|
#8
20-12-14, 12:43
|
||||
|
||||
The link doesn't work for me Hanno. I also don't agree with your statement of uniformity. See the page I reproduced from Terence Wise's book, where he list UC's in the normal regulations as coming under bridge classification No5. And yet the website that you refer to has it at No4. In the follow up page from yet another book that I reproduced, they show three different examples of Bren carrier numbers taken from original pictures which shows 3, 4 or 5.
I have read that different theatres of operation had different bridge weight classifications...... Did the Yanks have a different system to ours? Ron 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Vehicle signs for bridge weight rating | Spurrat | WW2 Military History & Equipment | 5 | 11-10-11 20:16 |
| Tac Sign | chris vickery | Post-war Military Vehicles | 4 | 23-01-11 17:59 |
| Where did the sign in bar go? | Phil Waterman | TAC HQ | 1 | 28-02-07 21:57 |
| Bridge Class Sign | Garry Shipton (RIP) | The Softskin Forum | 27 | 30-04-06 00:47 |
| div sign | Max Hedges | The Softskin Forum | 16 | 29-01-05 21:46 |
Threaded Mode