MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Carrier Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 14-02-11, 20:02
martyn martyn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: lincolnshire
Posts: 135
Default

richard you will rember where the fuel tanks sits after all by the time you have rivetted and painted and all the other jobs etc i will remind you they sit left and right of the rear axle and the speedo drive........... mk3 tanks are a bit longer i think as ive had to alter the front tank stop by trimming a bit out not bu much tho ?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 15-02-11, 01:53
martyn martyn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: lincolnshire
Posts: 135
Default

just sum photos i found of mine for you to see think yours were bad mate
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSCF3539.jpg (30.9 KB, 55 views)
File Type: jpg DSCF1577.jpg (100.8 KB, 53 views)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 15-02-11, 06:52
Lynn Eades Lynn Eades is offline
Bluebell
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand
Posts: 5,541
Default Martyn / Ben

The MkIII carrier fuel tanks are the same Capacity (10 gal) as the other carriers, and I think dimensionally the same.
The 1941 (june) print of the Canadian MkI* (early?) only shows the cap with the valve in it (no breather pipes) The parts book said; Do not order TL12464, to order CTL 410 SA. There are two left hand and two right hand tanks listed.
I'm guessing this cap with the ball and valve in it is spark arrestor set up. The Australian carriers have a spark arrestor in them.
__________________
Bluebell

Carrier Armoured O.P. No1 Mk3 W. T84991
Carrier Bren No2.Mk.I. NewZealand Railways. NZR.6.
Dodge WC55. 37mm Gun Motor Carriage M6
Jeep Mb #135668
So many questions....
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 15-02-11, 20:27
Richard Farrant's Avatar
Richard Farrant Richard Farrant is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Kent, England
Posts: 3,641
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lynn Eades View Post
I'm guessing this cap with the ball and valve in it is spark arrestor set up.
The ball valve stops petrol from escaping when traversing steep inclines, also to seal off in event of the Carrier overturning.
__________________
Richard

1943 Bedford QLD lorry - 1941 BSA WM20 m/cycle - 1943 Daimler Scout Car Mk2
Member of MVT, IMPS, MVG of NSW, KVE and AMVCS
KVE President & KVE News Editor
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 15-02-11, 21:54
Lynn Eades Lynn Eades is offline
Bluebell
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand
Posts: 5,541
Default Yes Richard

I too can state the obvious; The MAIN purpose is to allow air into the tank to stop it collapsing as the fuel is drawn off. BUT... when there is vapour pressure in the tank, does it lift the ball and close the valve? (the 3/4 steel ball weight, would hold back a bit of pressure)
Many carriers were built with the sealed cap, and vent tubes.
Were problems with these the reason for the "valved" caps/ non vented tank design?
Which design came first.
Was the vent pipe design o.k. for northern climates, but unsuitable for the desert theatre?
So many unanswered questions
__________________
Bluebell

Carrier Armoured O.P. No1 Mk3 W. T84991
Carrier Bren No2.Mk.I. NewZealand Railways. NZR.6.
Dodge WC55. 37mm Gun Motor Carriage M6
Jeep Mb #135668
So many questions....
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 15-02-11, 22:17
Richard Farrant's Avatar
Richard Farrant Richard Farrant is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Kent, England
Posts: 3,641
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lynn Eades View Post
I too can state the obvious; The MAIN purpose is to allow air into the tank to stop it collapsing as the fuel is drawn off. BUT... when there is vapour pressure in the tank, does it lift the ball and close the valve?
Well, I do not see how it could have been a spark arrestor, that is something you normally get on an exhaust pipe to stop sparks escaping, so I was just pointing out the true purpose of the ball valve, in case you were unaware.

It is doubtfull that vapour pressure would lift the ball enough to close the valve, as it would have to be a surge of pressure, where as vapour would be a slow build up. Only my thoughts though,
__________________
Richard

1943 Bedford QLD lorry - 1941 BSA WM20 m/cycle - 1943 Daimler Scout Car Mk2
Member of MVT, IMPS, MVG of NSW, KVE and AMVCS
KVE President & KVE News Editor
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 15-02-11, 22:24
Ben Ben is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 544
Default

I've checked FUC 03. The pictures seem to suggest the MK 1 had the tank pictured in Riche's post, two vents a filler cap and a fuel pick up. The MK 2 picture has vents in the same style as the MK 1 but with an extra fitting towards the middle of the tank. This I assume is the pressure valve!! Don't know how a pressurised system works if it's vented? Or if the cap has a valve what the extra fitting is? the part isn't labelled.

Ben
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 15-02-11, 23:20
Jordan Baker's Avatar
Jordan Baker Jordan Baker is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,179
Default

The mk2 carriers had a gas gauge on them. Thats probably what you think is a pressure valve.
__________________
Jordan Baker
RHLI Museum,
Otter LRC
C15A-Wire3, 1944
Willys MB, 1942
10cwt Canadian trailer
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 18:18.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016