MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Carrier Forum

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #31  
Old 20-02-11, 18:17
RichardT10829's Avatar
RichardT10829 RichardT10829 is offline
Richard Harrison
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cullercoats Newcastle Upon Tyne United Kingdom
Posts: 3,069
Default

i dont personally think they are vin plates... and i suppose at the reproduction of plates from his point of view would not be illegal...copied vins only become ileagal once they are used on a vehicle for the above purposes i mentioned....the manufacture is not the illeagal part...its the use.

just to throw a spanner in the works further the lists which are popping up on this thread list your 10128 carrier as a universal carrier no2 mk1* mine is 10131.... and after forensic testing of the remnants of my front armour and the numbers left therein (not complete) we arrived at the CT number being CT54508 by deduction (not fool proof) and my carrier is a No.3 Mk1* can i ask how you guys established 10128 was a no2 mk1* ? as this is throwing doubt into my mind about mine being what we beleive it to be...

its a minefield this numbering lark hahahaha.
__________________
is mos redintegro

__5th Div___46th Div__
1942 Ford Universal Carrier No.3 MkI*
Lower Hull No. 10131
War Department CT54508 (SOLD)
1944 Ford Universal Carrier MkII* (under restoration).
1944 Morris C8 radio body (under restoration).
Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 12:26.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016