MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Carrier Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 27-03-11, 21:49
Ben Ben is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 544
Default

Thank you all for your comments

I think you have a point, any parts should be marked in an unobtrusive way. The purpose as far as I'm concerned is in no way to miss lead anyone or pass them off as anything they are not, just to help fellow carrier owners furnish their vehicles.

I think in a funny sort of way the concern you are showing just confirms how good they look compared to the original and reassures me that they will look the part once fitted to a vehicle.

Ben
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 28-03-11, 01:19
RichardT10829's Avatar
RichardT10829 RichardT10829 is offline
Richard Harrison
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cullercoats Newcastle Upon Tyne United Kingdom
Posts: 3,069
Default

Ben i would like to thank you for doing the leg work on this, we seem to have gone from discussing production of a good quality replacement to ethics on the use of them...... god bless the human race suppose if you scribe in repro and a date on the inside, then for what ever reason if someone wants to remove them at a later date (for why i would not know) then who ever removes them can see they were not cast during the war. alternate ruin your good work by stamping in stuff in visable place...like a visible vin i suppose.....

personally i dont think this should have to be your responsibility (its a lot of extra work for you and stamping cast brass can cause breakages) IMHO its down to the individual to list down what is new and original on their carriers.... for me its all documented and i will stamp the part somehow.....so i guess if this is the case i should stamp all the armour plate ? and the segments of post war steel that i have stitched into the original platework to complete my bulkhead then there are the re rubbered wheels corr that will be a nightmare. now technically those who pilfered bits from other carriers for their own should do the same ? stamping in some denomination that indicates they were not fitted at factory...or fitted during restoration.


i am a big believer of honesty but the question must surely be raised....where do you stop ? and how do you justify where you stop ?

i will no doubt get flamed for this post but its a fair and valid thought is it not ?

we are leapyears away with this from what has been mentioned regarding ringing of chassis etc etc... this i firmly frown upon
__________________
is mos redintegro

__5th Div___46th Div__
1942 Ford Universal Carrier No.3 MkI*
Lower Hull No. 10131
War Department CT54508 (SOLD)
1944 Ford Universal Carrier MkII* (under restoration).
1944 Morris C8 radio body (under restoration).
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 28-03-11, 01:55
Phil Waterman Phil Waterman is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Temple, New Hampshire, USA
Posts: 3,929
Default Compiment on quality of work not complaint about reproduction

Hi All

Please excuse any unintentional negative inference in my comments.

Ben should take any concern about not being able to tell his parts from good condition original very much as a compliment for taking the time to do a really good job.

Might I suggest that we start a new thread, not related to any particular restoration project, to discuss how to convey the history of vehicles and their parts. The photo albums that most the restorers on this forum seem to keep document the meticulous care taken in both restoring "original" parts and the fabrication of missing or un-restoreable parts.

Cheers Phil

Again my apologies
__________________
Phil Waterman
`41 C60L Pattern 12
`42 C60S Radio Pattern 13
`45 HUP
http://canadianmilitarypattern.com/
New e-mail Philip@canadianmilitarypattern.com
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 28-03-11, 02:24
Lynn Eades Lynn Eades is offline
Bluebell
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand
Posts: 5,541
Default Richard Ben Craig and others.

Firstly Ben I think your castings look great!
Second Rich, you are right this should be a separate thread.
By the way you cant stop there. I have no idea what you are talking about with "ringing chassis" Please explain.
Some people are lucky or prepared enough to have aquired a carrier that needs a bit of paint, and the oil levels checked. A quick flick of the wrist and she's fully restored.
The other 99 out of a 100 have carriers in a different state. I see a Loyd on this forum being rebuilt (or is it "built from scratch")
I know that Ben is also pretty brave/ bold starting from where he is.
My LP will be about 20% one carrier 20% another. bits of English or Canadian
( some original parts from Canada were used anyhow) I will make a lot of bits.
I cannot find info on it to detail the dash board area. I will have to "wing it"
If I do the best I can, am I doing a restoration, or is it going to be a jalopy?
I never planned to mark any bits I make. Maybe I should be?
__________________
Bluebell

Carrier Armoured O.P. No1 Mk3 W. T84991
Carrier Bren No2.Mk.I. NewZealand Railways. NZR.6.
Dodge WC55. 37mm Gun Motor Carriage M6
Jeep Mb #135668
So many questions....
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 28-03-11, 05:09
George McKenzie George McKenzie is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Northern Alberta CA
Posts: 451
Default New cast Bren gun pintles

In the auto restorations the drive line is the only thing that is important to keep it original .I am the second owner of a 1928 A Ford cvt that is original ,but it has a honey comb radiater and a single plate glass windsheild .Ford said he never did this in his cars .This likely was done at the factory because they probly ran out of these parts when making them so they used jobber parts. The quality of the parts that are being made for the carriers is so good I wouldn't think they would need a build date on them .
__________________
George is hooked on OD
5 window DT969
8 ton Fruehauf trailer
M2A1Halftrack ,CMP #11 F15A1 #13 F15A1
RAF Fordson Tractor, 42 WLC HD
No.2MK11 CT267514 center CB24713 bottom hull25701 ,No.2 MK2 parts
MK1 10128 ,(2) MK1 ,Parts Hull9305 .Hull 10407
Hull plate # 7250 all have walk plate on back steps
1917 Patent modle amphibious army tank
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 28-03-11, 11:33
RichardT10829's Avatar
RichardT10829 RichardT10829 is offline
Richard Harrison
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cullercoats Newcastle Upon Tyne United Kingdom
Posts: 3,069
Default

Lynn

Sorry mate its that Geordie slang weaning its way back into my texts... "Ringer" is a term used to describe a vehicle that has had its identity changed the example (especially here in Newcastle) would be a team would find a write off car they then take the vins glass and reg plates off, they then go out and steel a car identical to the write off that they have taken the plates from.... then swap the glass the plates and reg..... then sell it... or use it for a bank job etc etc.

Shaun has touched on this with the landrovers i can tell you its rife ! mainly folk who want to avoid road tax.....same with Mini's this goes back to my comments of Georges thread regarding repro data plates.

Phil i dont think anyone has taken offence at your comments and the points you raised are certainly valid ones... as it has been stated perhaps another thread on this very subject would be best. Once again though Ben great work on the quality of the pintle mounts needless to say i will want a full set + machined (i want to be able to pop them straight onto my new armour)
__________________
is mos redintegro

__5th Div___46th Div__
1942 Ford Universal Carrier No.3 MkI*
Lower Hull No. 10131
War Department CT54508 (SOLD)
1944 Ford Universal Carrier MkII* (under restoration).
1944 Morris C8 radio body (under restoration).
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 28-03-11, 12:13
Ben Ben is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 544
Default

I've just spoken with the machinist.

He wants £5 per casting to machine the holes and skim for thickness. that means a raw cast is £45 each and machined £50 each. i didn't think it's too bad a price to have the work done. there is a small hinge dowel that needs making but i'll include the drawings for this with the pintles for the folks buying them.

If anybody wants to trade parts for castings i'm open to offers, please pm me.

Thanks

Ben

Last edited by Ben; 28-03-11 at 12:42.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 28-03-11, 13:07
ajmac's Avatar
ajmac ajmac is offline
Alastair McMurray
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Lincoln, England
Posts: 435
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lynn Eades View Post
or is it "built from scratch"
Not quite from scratch Lynn
There will be more original wartime parts than can be found in most airworthy WW2 aircraft....or having said that, more than all the 'original' vintage racing cars in Europe. I could have left those wrecks in the scrapyard, or brought a rare vehicle back to life and not be forgotten (there are NO running Loyds in the UK), I chose the latter, but I really do see the point of view regarding originality.
The loyd is an odd vehicle, even a good project today requires virtually all the hull replacing as they are only 2mm thick, the drivers floor rots both itself and the lower chassis rail away by design. As far as I know every restored Loyd in Europe has been made up from at LEAST two wrecks! Except Pauls that is
__________________
Alastair
Lincoln, UK.


Under Restoration:
1944 No2 MK2 Loyd Carrier - Tracked Towing
1944 Ford WOT6 Lorry


The Loyd on Facebook
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 29-03-11, 02:33
carrierbarry carrierbarry is offline
Barry
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Watford, London
Posts: 216
Default Bren attachment.

Just to be clear once you've got your new/old pintle mount bolted to your carrier and it looks wonderful.
How do you attach the Bren Gun?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 29-03-11, 07:33
Lynn Eades Lynn Eades is offline
Bluebell
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand
Posts: 5,541
Default Barry

You then need one of these.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg august_09_160.jpg (96.6 KB, 58 views)
__________________
Bluebell

Carrier Armoured O.P. No1 Mk3 W. T84991
Carrier Bren No2.Mk.I. NewZealand Railways. NZR.6.
Dodge WC55. 37mm Gun Motor Carriage M6
Jeep Mb #135668
So many questions....
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 29-03-11, 11:35
RichardT10829's Avatar
RichardT10829 RichardT10829 is offline
Richard Harrison
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cullercoats Newcastle Upon Tyne United Kingdom
Posts: 3,069
Default

or a pogo stick har har har...... Kevin made a fantastic repro pintle pole for his carrier absolutely cock on it was....cant remember who made it for him, i think it was a mate of his
__________________
is mos redintegro

__5th Div___46th Div__
1942 Ford Universal Carrier No.3 MkI*
Lower Hull No. 10131
War Department CT54508 (SOLD)
1944 Ford Universal Carrier MkII* (under restoration).
1944 Morris C8 radio body (under restoration).
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 00:21.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016