![]() |
#22
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Ben i would like to thank you for doing the leg work on this, we seem to have gone from discussing production of a good quality replacement to ethics on the use of them...... god bless the human race
![]() personally i dont think this should have to be your responsibility (its a lot of extra work for you and stamping cast brass can cause breakages) IMHO its down to the individual to list down what is new and original on their carriers.... for me its all documented and i will stamp the part somehow.....so i guess if this is the case i should stamp all the armour plate ? and the segments of post war steel that i have stitched into the original platework to complete my bulkhead then there are the re rubbered wheels corr that will be a nightmare. now technically those who pilfered bits from other carriers for their own should do the same ? stamping in some denomination that indicates they were not fitted at factory...or fitted during restoration. i am a big believer of honesty but the question must surely be raised....where do you stop ? and how do you justify where you stop ? i will no doubt get flamed for this post but its a fair and valid thought is it not ? we are leapyears away with this from what has been mentioned regarding ringing of chassis etc etc... this i firmly frown upon
__________________
is mos redintegro __5th Div___46th Div__ 1942 Ford Universal Carrier No.3 MkI* Lower Hull No. 10131 War Department CT54508 (SOLD) 1944 Ford Universal Carrier MkII* (under restoration). 1944 Morris C8 radio body (under restoration). |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|