![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I've been checking through my manuals and photos, but cannot find a good photo of the points where the front and rear brake lines attach to chassis at the point where the flexible brake hoses start. I have bought more of the bundy tube, and was hoping to form the major lines this weekend. Problem is that I dont know where they end, or for that matter, what sort of bracket was used at the junction of metal lines to flexible brake hose, either front or rear. If anyone can point me to a diagram in Ford manual or parts books, I would be very grateful.
The brake line pieces I made last weekend are now with the local hydraulic shop, and I will pick them up tomorrow. When the larger pieces are formed they will be going to the same place for double flaring.
__________________
Ford CMP, 115" WB,1942 (Under Restoration...still) Medium sized, half fake, artillery piece project. (The 1/4 Pounder) Last edited by Private_collector; 04-01-13 at 08:26. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Tony,
Will grab a few photos later today of the original brackets you are enquiring about and post them here. Up early due to a hot night here in Melbourne. Cheers,
__________________
F15-A 1942 Battery Staff Jacques Reed |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thanks mate!
I don't envy you southern folks today. Or indeed for next few days apparently. I hope none of you guys are at risk of bushfires? We had 43c degrees about a week ago. Its a worry when even your candles start to melt in their holders.
__________________
Ford CMP, 115" WB,1942 (Under Restoration...still) Medium sized, half fake, artillery piece project. (The 1/4 Pounder) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Tony,
No fires here yet thank God. Luckily we are in a more suburban area. I know of one Ford sidevalve V8 car collector who lost a beautiful huge collection in the 2009 Black Saturday fires. Heartbreaking for any car enthusiast. Atached are the photos of the brackets that hold the hoses at the chassis. Acording to my parts manual for the F15A they are numbered 01T 2073 for the rear and C11QF 2083 for the front. Mine are devoid of brake lines. Long story, probably for another post but in short: a Rigid flaring tool I bought had a defect in the die block that put a small ridge on the back side of the flare. Was afraid it could cause leaking problems so have started re-doing all my brake lines. Rigid made good anyway and sent me a new die when I showed them a photo of the defect. Lifetime guarantees do mean lifetime for some companies. Cheers
__________________
F15-A 1942 Battery Staff Jacques Reed |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Maybe my thread F15A brake lines is of some help? Hanno
__________________
Regards, Hanno -------------------------- |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hanno, you little treasure, thats exactly what I needed to see.
I think I can work from that info and the accompanying photos. Merci zelfs zeer!
__________________
Ford CMP, 115" WB,1942 (Under Restoration...still) Medium sized, half fake, artillery piece project. (The 1/4 Pounder) |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Your closeup photos will help me to manufacture the new brake line brackets, and certainly remove any doubt about which holes the brackets use. Thanks.
I was surprised how vague the diagrams in the manuals are. Beyond showing which sides the pipes go, which I already knew, they were a bit of a Chocolate Teapot really! I think I have a bracket from an F15A that I can modify to suit the front. Hopefully there will be a piece of scrap steel laying around here soewhere that will become the rear one. Have been having a bit of discussin with guy from MacsAuto regarding spring bolts for the rear suspension. I'll write more about that when I get home.
__________________
Ford CMP, 115" WB,1942 (Under Restoration...still) Medium sized, half fake, artillery piece project. (The 1/4 Pounder) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Tony
One of the things I found interesting is that it appears that Ford and Chevy didn't agree on which side of the frame the brake lines should run. Wonder if this was just a carry over from civi construction practice. Keep us posted with the photos. I'll comb through my photos to see if I've got any pictures of Ford chassis which might provide info on the routing. Cheers Phil
__________________
Phil Waterman `41 C60L Pattern 12 `42 C60S Radio Pattern 13 `45 HUP http://canadianmilitarypattern.com/ New e-mail Philip@canadianmilitarypattern.com |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Further to this discussion I have found it is very difficult over the years to find original hydraulic brake line on any CMP vehicles. If they are not completely removed then they are bent beyond recognition or jury rigged from whatever tubing was left lying around.
I attached some photos I took back in 1991 of what I think was an original set of front diff lines on a F15A based on their age, quality of fabrication and lack of damage. I used their design for fabricating my lines. As for the rear lines I had no originals to go by. The lines shown came on a second truck I bought. The left side seems old and quite well made and could be original. The right side needed a bit of fairing to conform to the diff having been damaged at a few places. In view of lack of any other info I have used their shape to fabricate the new rear diff lines. I am sure there are many other variations on the theme. Also included is a recent photo of a chassis line leading to the front diff through a grommet on a paddock bomb F15A. Again whether it is original or not is debateable but the flare fitting tube joiner caught my eye. Maybe the front was damaged and a new tube spliced in or was it "factory" to make installing the "L" shape tubing through the chassis easier? Cheers,
__________________
F15-A 1942 Battery Staff Jacques Reed |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Here's some photo's from mine - there are two arrangements in the manuals and that can make it seem confusing.
But it isnt really (once youve completed it of course).. Phil is correct, the line to the back brakes runs down the left hand side. The lines to the front run along their respective sides. You need three flex hoses in all...
__________________
Pax Vobiscum.......may you eat three meals a day & have regular bowel movements. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Jacques, I've seen that joiner before too.
On the rear, yours is almost correct, but you'll see there is a threaded hole just under the spring on the axle which is for a securing clamp where the pipe should go. That way there is less risk of crushing the pipe when reversing. I'll have a look at the FGT which is original, and which also means should be replaced for safety, the only major difference is where the rear line connects to the flexible hose - because the winch is in the way the mounting bracket is on the winch mount.
__________________
Film maker 42 FGT No8 (Aust) remains 42 FGT No9 (Aust) 42 F15 Keith Webb Macleod, Victoria Australia Also Canadian Military Pattern Vehicles group on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/groups/canadianmilitarypattern |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hi folks.
Jacques, In comparing brake line photos, there a certainly differences in the lines. My front one was original but squashed in places. I copied off that and recreated a fairly close copy. I must admit I dont like seeing the tubing anywhere near a surface that could rub against it now or later. For that reason, I tend to add more bends to the line, to follow around raised areas, brackets, etc. That is most evident on the rear set of tubes, but the front ones have a lesser degree of the creative licence. My rear right side line does not follow around the diff hump like yours does. I'm wondering if I can rework that one to do so. Will have a look at that tomorrow. I have saved a copy of those photos for future reference. Thanks! After roughly a week of back & forth emails to Macs, I finally got the information I had initially requested. That being the OD measurement of a shackle bolt in their 1932-1948 passenger &1932 -1947 pickup catalog. It is the correct Ford part, 01T-5780, but I have had experiences in past where I have gone from part no. alone, only to discover Ford reused the number for a subsequent civilian vehicle application, and the part was way too small. The exact lising for the shackle bolt is: "38-47 4.28" long, 2 ton truck except 122" (6 required).......01T-5780 $9.50. This is the 1" thick bolt for Ford rear springs on 4x4 vehicles. I have no experience or info as to whether it is same for the 4x2 variants. Have now ordered six of these, along with the bolt locking pins (part no. 81T-5782) for each. I should not need to purchase bushings from Macs, because local hydraulic shop can source an extensive range of bushings. I prefer to try to support local businesses, so long as the service warrants this! My thanks to Jacques, for supplying me with the rear spring hanger which I had been missing. ![]() ![]()
__________________
Ford CMP, 115" WB,1942 (Under Restoration...still) Medium sized, half fake, artillery piece project. (The 1/4 Pounder) Last edited by Private_collector; 05-01-13 at 00:27. |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I expect factory felt it was difficult to produce, or possibly replace whole length in the field. Won't be an issue for me to do in one, but if I do find one before I lay the chassis pipes, I will use one. Once the pipes are in place, that's when they will start dropping out of trees. ![]() Also note that the rear bracket joining pipe to hose looks nothing like any of the examples shown here. In fact it doesnt look like it could possibly work, because it has the pipe etc.. sitting above the bolting position!!!! 20130105_115454.jpg Here's a photo showing both items. See what I mean about the bracket.
__________________
Ford CMP, 115" WB,1942 (Under Restoration...still) Medium sized, half fake, artillery piece project. (The 1/4 Pounder) |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|