![]() |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Keith,
I've always found it interesting that the two companies achieved the same end (well, sort of!) using very different methods. I suspect the GMH Chev seal was the more durable (just like their hatch design - as you pointed out before, the Ford hatch was prone to rusting out from the inside of the two-piece 'sandwich'.) I also liked the Chev single-piece grab handle, rather than the Ford top-hat section fitted with two standard 'hardware' handles. In all, the Aust Chev hatch, hatch aperture and locking system seemed to be a much better design than the Aust Ford. What do you think? Mike |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cab 13 hatches | chippyrail | The Softskin Forum | 4 | 12-03-12 03:10 |
Roof hatches | chritoum | The Softskin Forum | 6 | 12-12-08 09:36 |
tin roof | ron | The Carrier Forum | 0 | 09-03-06 02:20 |
mk I Engine Hatches | Brad Mills | The Carrier Forum | 1 | 26-09-05 22:02 |
Ice Dams on My Roof - Help!! | Geoff Winnington-Ball (RIP) | The Sergeants' Mess | 18 | 17-03-03 08:44 |