MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > GENERAL WW2 TOPICS > WW2 Military History & Equipment

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 15-05-17, 00:14
rob love rob love is offline
carrier mech
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Shilo MB, the armpit of Canada
Posts: 7,594
Default

Sounds like 13 bty was Winnipeg during that time period. Someone wrote a fair history of the Battery here: http://army.ca/forums/index.php?topic=25697.0
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 15-05-17, 03:11
Michael R. Michael R. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,166
Default

As gunners, it is interesting but understandable given the location, year and purpose of the scheme to note the absence of issue small arms and accessories. Other than ammunition pouches, no helmets, basic pouches, bayonets, sub-machine guns, or sidearm for the 2nd Lt.

Familiarization with the MK-I BREN, but not too familiar. Can you spot the same fault or error remaining in both images of the BREN?

Last edited by Michael R.; 15-05-17 at 03:30.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 16-05-17, 01:51
rob love rob love is offline
carrier mech
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Shilo MB, the armpit of Canada
Posts: 7,594
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael R. View Post
As gunners, it is interesting but understandable given the location, year and purpose of the scheme to note the absence of issue small arms and accessories. Other than ammunition pouches, no helmets, basic pouches, bayonets, sub-machine guns, or sidearm for the 2nd Lt.

Familiarization with the MK-I BREN, but not too familiar. Can you spot the same fault or error remaining in both images of the BREN?
In both images the barrel nut lever is not seated. With an earlier gun than that it would not be possible to fire the gun....there is a small tab on the nut that would block the piston from moving forward. However, since the gun is a mk1m, that safety feature was omitted, and one could be having to head down range slightly to retrieve ones barrel if live firing.

This very thing happened during the sales pitch to the British government by the Brno engineers. The engineer designed the safety feature almost overnight and it was incorporated into the Bren mk1. A lot of superfluous and luxury features were on the mk1, many of which were deleted on the mk1m, and even more deleted for the mk2.

Last edited by rob love; 16-05-17 at 02:12.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 17-05-17, 21:19
rob love rob love is offline
carrier mech
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Shilo MB, the armpit of Canada
Posts: 7,594
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael R. View Post

Familiarization with the MK-I BREN, but not too familiar. Can you spot the same fault or error remaining in both images of the BREN?
I meant to add: there is also a fault or error in the usage of the 18pr in sets 9 and set8. Any good Sgt Major would immediately rectify such an error. Can anyone spot it?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 17-05-17, 22:55
rob love rob love is offline
carrier mech
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Shilo MB, the armpit of Canada
Posts: 7,594
Default

Not just leaning, but (shudder) in one photo actually sitting on the gun.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 17-05-17, 23:10
Ed Storey Ed Storey is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 1,718
Default Rules and Traditions

I don't think those rules and traditions came into effect until after the SWW, the post-WWII 'Glory Years' when the citizens army was transformed into a professional military.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 18-05-17, 01:15
Rob Fast Rob Fast is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Manitoba Canada
Posts: 851
Default Pine Ridge Map 1938...exercises

I dug this commanders board out of the pile, I knew it was somewhere. I thought pics might be appropriate on this thread. Pine Ridge map dated 1938, with the plexiéplastic overlay and details of the exercise. I have not had time to investigate the details of locations, but here it is. Cheers Rob
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_0714.JPG (60.1 KB, 4 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_0715.JPG (58.8 KB, 6 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_0716.JPG (65.9 KB, 5 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_0717.JPG (71.1 KB, 6 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_0718.JPG (45.3 KB, 2 views)
__________________
1942 C8A- HUW " Wireless Nipper"
1943 F-60S LAAT and 1939 Bofors
1942 C8 Wireless
1943 FAT/ 17 pounder
1941 C15 GS 2B1
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 18-05-17, 01:20
Rob Fast Rob Fast is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Manitoba Canada
Posts: 851
Default Missed a pic...

back of the board.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_0719.JPG (47.9 KB, 2 views)
__________________
1942 C8A- HUW " Wireless Nipper"
1943 F-60S LAAT and 1939 Bofors
1942 C8 Wireless
1943 FAT/ 17 pounder
1941 C15 GS 2B1
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
photo of M152CDN photo lab/Command post KAGA Post-war Military Vehicles 0 09-10-10 16:24
photo id Bruce MacMillan WW2 Military History & Equipment 15 05-01-07 21:20
Photo Frantisek Nachlinger The Softskin Forum 0 03-11-05 19:51
Various equipment photo's for identification and review F95476 WW2 Military History & Equipment 16 06-08-05 19:35
Need Photo of 2 cm Gun Dean Owen WW2 Military History & Equipment 7 18-11-03 16:26


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 18:58.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016