MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Restoration Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-08-17, 00:21
Jacques Reed Jacques Reed is offline
VMVC
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Victoria Australia
Posts: 866
Default ID of Ford Engine

Hi David,

Welcome to the forum! Always great to have new members onboard and to hear that another Ford CMP truck has been saved from extinction.

I cannot offer any info based on the s/n but a photo of it would help to identify it.

As a general rule, the raised casting number and letters on the right front side of the block and/or the bell housing will give you the date the block was cast. If you post them I can identify it for you. It would be something like "C..9A"

There are some Blitzes around that have been retro fitted with earlier 21 stud motors which automatically rules it out being the original, likewise the later 8BA engines with the separate bell housing, top mounted distributor etc.

Car engines were often substituted for the truck engines over the years so things like single sheave pulleys on the crank, water pumps, and generator indicate a passenger car engine. A 1944 CMP truck would have used double row pulleys.

Hope this point you in the right direction to get an answer.

Cheers,
__________________
F15-A 1942 Battery Staff

Jacques Reed
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-08-17, 04:48
Keith Webb's Avatar
Keith Webb Keith Webb is offline
Film maker, CMP addict
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: HIGHTON VIC
Posts: 8,218
Default Welcome

Likewise welcome here David.

Have a look on top of the valley machined surface for an engine number as well. The original engines for a 1944/45 model was 4G with a F suffix.

Out of interest the original engine number is usually stamped on the top go the gearbox housing and also on the right front chassis next to the engine mount, this doubles as the chassis number.

Jacques is right on the money for help with the ID of different flathead types.
__________________
Film maker

42 FGT No8 (Aust) remains
42 FGT No9 (Aust)
42 F15
Keith Webb
Macleod, Victoria Australia
Also Canadian Military Pattern Vehicles group on Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/groups/canadianmilitarypattern
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-08-17, 13:27
David Nicholson David Nicholson is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Tamworth, Australia
Posts: 21
Default

Thanks for the encouragement and info... I haven't found many more casting marks, but it is still covered in thick layers of dust and oil! I'm suspicious that it may not be the original engine. I do have the data plates for the truck, and the engine serials don't match. However, I have read that this was occasionally the case with wartime manufacturing!

Anyway, here are some photo's as promised.....
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_1169.jpg (719.6 KB, 16 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_1228.jpg (729.7 KB, 11 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_1230.jpg (785.5 KB, 14 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_1236.jpg (1.05 MB, 11 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_1237.jpg (812.9 KB, 5 views)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-08-17, 13:44
David Nicholson David Nicholson is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Tamworth, Australia
Posts: 21
Default

And with 20 x 1200 Tyres fitted to the front which I found. Looking for more.....

Engine is out, trying to free some valves, and remove split valve guides. Ready for it's acid bath.....then off to the specialist for rebuild evaluation.....

The truck came with good radiator, lights(Minus the lenses!!!), and a whole lot of bits and pieces! Engine was complete but seized.

Engine may not be original as stated before. Bore's measure 3 3/16 (3.1875).

I purchased another engine, but it was worse than original, so will re-build this one if nothing too bad is found...

I bought some excellent engine covers which are complete and rust free...

It looks like the transfer case intermediate gear has failed at some point, so will need that looking at.

Gearbox looks in excellent condition. I have removed the side cover and drained the oil(sludge) and inspected the gears which all seem ok, and without pitting!!!(Need a win sometime!).

BTW, does anyone know if you can directly replace the older style split valve guides, for the latter model guides and valves in the older blocks?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_1244.jpg (773.9 KB, 6 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_1243.jpg (884.5 KB, 12 views)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-08-17, 14:45
Tony Smith's Avatar
Tony Smith Tony Smith is offline
No1, Mk 2** (I'm back!)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lithgow, NSW, Australia
Posts: 5,042
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Nicholson View Post
BTW, does anyone know if you can directly replace the older style split valve guides, for the latter model guides and valves in the older blocks?
Yes, you can. A little info on Valvetrain in THIS THREAD
__________________
You can help Keep Mapleleafup Up! See Here how you can help, and why you should!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-08-17, 22:57
Keith Webb's Avatar
Keith Webb Keith Webb is offline
Film maker, CMP addict
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: HIGHTON VIC
Posts: 8,218
Default Engine colour

Looking at the front on shot it has a 'Divers Helmet' distributor as fitted to the 1941 vehicles. You mentioned the engine number is different to the one on the data plate, what is the number of the engine that was in it?
I have some NOS transfer case gears, might have the one you need, but will have to dig them out of storage.
__________________
Film maker

42 FGT No8 (Aust) remains
42 FGT No9 (Aust)
42 F15
Keith Webb
Macleod, Victoria Australia
Also Canadian Military Pattern Vehicles group on Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/groups/canadianmilitarypattern
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-08-17, 23:58
Mike Cecil Mike Cecil is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cody, Wyoming, USA
Posts: 2,380
Default

What did you do with the boom crane? It looks to be the original crane as fitted to the F60L. Both the RAAF and the Army (mainly engineer units) used that crane type.

The original engine number, as Keith said, was also used as the chassis number of Aust assembled/built Fords, so that would be helpful in finding out its original identity/military registration number.

Nice project. Best of luck. The thread Tony pointed you to re valves just about provides everything you need to know or the options you have before you. As for pistons and crank shaft bearings, I used a later model crank shaft with two oil holes per journal, and fixed shell bearings rather than the original full-float type. Four ring pistons and 8BA con rods with fixed shell bearings. Also a crab-type distributor rather than the helmet type you already have. Balanced, it went like a train.

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-08-17, 14:13
David Nicholson David Nicholson is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Tamworth, Australia
Posts: 21
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith Webb View Post
Looking at the front on shot it has a 'Divers Helmet' distributor as fitted to the 1941 vehicles. You mentioned the engine number is different to the one on the data plate, what is the number of the engine that was in it?
I have some NOS transfer case gears, might have the one you need, but will have to dig them out of storage.
Thanks Keith, I'd appreciate if you had some gears, and wanted to sell them. Keep me in mind as I'll be looking at the TX case soon.....

4G6532F is the number given on the data plate....see pic. The number on the casting on the bell housing is D363:1 K. Engine does have the divers helmet fitted. Mmmmmm need to find more numbers on the engine. I'm beginning to think it was a quick fix by putting another motor in it?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_1385.jpg (590.9 KB, 9 views)
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-08-17, 14:28
Tony Smith's Avatar
Tony Smith Tony Smith is offline
No1, Mk 2** (I'm back!)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lithgow, NSW, Australia
Posts: 5,042
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Nicholson View Post
And with 20 x 1200 Tyres fitted to the front which I found. Looking for more.....
When it was fitted with duals, there was a spacer fitted to the front hub to allow correct steering geometry with the offset "Dual" rim. If you're going back to 12.00-20's on single rims, you will need to remove the spacer to get correct steering again. The spacers were made by the Aust Army for fitment to to 3 ton tippers.
__________________
You can help Keep Mapleleafup Up! See Here how you can help, and why you should!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 13-08-17, 07:51
David Nicholson David Nicholson is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Tamworth, Australia
Posts: 21
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony Smith View Post
When it was fitted with duals, there was a spacer fitted to the front hub to allow correct steering geometry with the offset "Dual" rim. If you're going back to 12.00-20's on single rims, you will need to remove the spacer to get correct steering again. The spacers were made by the Aust Army for fitment to to 3 ton tippers.
Thanks Tony! Appreciate the information........

I've also got 3 out of 4 Shockabsorbers apparently seized? Has anybody had any experience in un-seizing these? I imagine you can't get new ones .... But I'd like to get them moving at least. Not sure if I'll ever need them to work as designed......With those springs I dont think I'll really notice the difference crawling through the bush....
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 16-08-17, 04:07
Jacques Reed Jacques Reed is offline
VMVC
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Victoria Australia
Posts: 866
Default Houdaille shock absorbers

Hi David,

Wish I could tell you how to un-seize them but I can't. Years ago I tried everything from filling with Penetrene, acetone, and even soaking in kero for a month. Nothing moved. I didn't try brake fluid and acetone together as has been mentioned before as a great penetrant for seized nuts and studs. Perhaps that might work?

I wound up getting them restored by Frank Curcio in Melbourne who specialized in reconditioning those type of shock absorber as used on A Model Fords but are a bit smaller. He took a couple extra ones apart for me so I could have a look. I don't think he is still in business though. To do it again I would do it myself as all he did was heat up the arm at the pivot shaft while using a puller that he fabricated for the job. Once the arm is off, the hardest part, the rest comes apart easily for cleaning.

As per the photos Houdaille shock absorbers are beautifully machined and that is the problem. Once the fluid congeals or goes hard in those tight clearances it effectively locks everything up.

Beware too that they have a clockwise and anti-clockwise operation so you cannot swap left to right and vice versa should you find some that move.

There are a few websites that explain Houdaille shock absorbers which makes for interesting reading.

Hopefully I got the ball rolling and someone will be able to add to this.

Cheers,
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 000_0092.JPG (236.7 KB, 3 views)
File Type: jpg 000_0163.JPG (160.4 KB, 1 views)
__________________
F15-A 1942 Battery Staff

Jacques Reed
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Door Resto Barry Churcher The Restoration Forum 13 15-05-22 15:36
FAT cab 13 No 9 resto Mrs Vampire The Softskin Forum 27 29-09-21 06:11
C15A resto harrygrey382 The Restoration Forum 9 08-06-15 09:40
another CAN m37 resto Steve Wilson The Restoration Forum 11 25-08-12 15:57
m 37 resto in new brunswick pauljboudreau Post-war Military Vehicles 118 07-03-11 22:29


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 00:05.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016