MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Carrier Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 21-04-20, 19:58
Mike Cecil Mike Cecil is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cody, Wyoming, USA
Posts: 2,381
Default Australian carrier parts manufacture

As Lynn has pointed out, Australian carriers used track derived from the Vickers light tank Mk.VIA, which had different dimensions to British etc carrier track.

As an aside, this difference caused some logistical problems early in the war when the Brits placed an order for carrier track manufactured in Australia, and received Aust track that didn't fit the Brit carrier. Ooops.

Subsequent overseas orders for track link placed in Australia resulted in the Australian production of British specification track, pins, plugs, sprockets, and suspension arms which were sent to both the UK and ME in large quantities. A mix up/lack of information at the production stage resulted in much of this track being condemned by the Brits due to breakages. It was then re-supplied to the correct specifications and dispatched overseas to ME and UK.

The main Aust manufacturer of track, etc to Brit specifications was H.V. McKay.

So Australian industry was manufacturing both types of tracks, etc: Aust track for LP carriers, and Brit track for Brit carriers. The Aust armies (AMF and AIF) were operating carriers of both origins, so needed spares to suit. The supply chain problem was thus much more complicated than it needed to be by having to maintain two parallel supply lines for carrier spares, and was dependent upon units, when ordering spares, to specify exactly which type of carrier spare was required. Plenty of room for stuff ups, wasted time and resources.

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 21-04-20, 22:02
rob love rob love is offline
carrier mech
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Shilo MB, the armpit of Canada
Posts: 7,610
Default

So I am at the shop now for a short visit (Covid-19 restrictions...we aren't supposed to be at work) and the Swiss track link measures 9" wide, vice the 9-1/2 in width of the UC carrier in front of it. Some of the links have CWC cast into them, along with a TL2948 number on the other side. I have a photo of one links where the pin has crept out. No bushing in the track link that I can see, so it is not like they rebuilt the track.
There are a number of other casting marks that I will get at another time. I don't want too overstay my welcome on the base.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSC01607.jpg (406.8 KB, 3 views)
File Type: jpg DSC01611.jpg (380.2 KB, 7 views)

Last edited by rob love; 22-04-20 at 07:10.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 21-04-20, 22:38
Lynn Eades Lynn Eades is offline
Bluebell
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand
Posts: 5,541
Default

Thank you all. How do I put this?
Broad statement: (because the pitch and pin sizes are universal)

"Basically all U.C. track is the same". However:

There are two areas where it varies:

1. The two sizes of track in relation to the width between the "horns" or "tongues" (wide or narrow bogie wheels)

2. The pin and how it is located. The lead plug Australian track has a "stop" at the inner end (see earlier post) this stops the pin moving on through. Once fitted in the track links, a lead plug (like a .38" wad cutter) is fitted and punched. This spreads into a groove in the outer hole, which contains the pin in service.
Obviously this pin is shorter (than a pin with a head and a split pin hole)

My question about the Swiss pin is "What form do they take?"
Are they the same as the Aust. lead plug pin? (a straight, plain pin with no head)

With Australian track, a small drilling exercise to remove the "stop" would allow the use of a Canadian or British track joining pin.
To put it another way: A Canadian (or British) link is 9.5" (241mm) wide (where the pin goes through) Is Swiss track narrower?
__________________
Bluebell

Carrier Armoured O.P. No1 Mk3 W. T84991
Carrier Bren No2.Mk.I. NewZealand Railways. NZR.6.
Dodge WC55. 37mm Gun Motor Carriage M6
Jeep Mb #135668
So many questions....

Last edited by Lynn Eades; 21-04-20 at 22:40. Reason: insert a ")"
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 21-04-20, 23:25
rob love rob love is offline
carrier mech
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Shilo MB, the armpit of Canada
Posts: 7,610
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lynn Eades View Post
To put it another way: A Canadian (or British) link is 9.5" (241mm) wide (where the pin goes through) Is Swiss track narrower?
If you read my post above, the Cdn that I measured today is 9.5, and the Swiss is 9"
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 22-04-20, 01:17
Perry Kitson Perry Kitson is offline
metal urgest
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: London, Ont
Posts: 465
Default

The pins I had that were presumably for the modified Swiss track were cold headed on one end and drilled for a cotter pin on the other.
Interesting to see the collars that are used on the Swiss modified track, they look to be about 5/8" wide?

Last edited by Perry Kitson; 22-04-20 at 01:23.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 22-04-20, 05:22
Lynn Eades Lynn Eades is offline
Bluebell
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand
Posts: 5,541
Default

So, now we need an explanation of the difference between Swiss track and Modified Swiss track
__________________
Bluebell

Carrier Armoured O.P. No1 Mk3 W. T84991
Carrier Bren No2.Mk.I. NewZealand Railways. NZR.6.
Dodge WC55. 37mm Gun Motor Carriage M6
Jeep Mb #135668
So many questions....
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 22-04-20, 07:08
rob love rob love is offline
carrier mech
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Shilo MB, the armpit of Canada
Posts: 7,610
Default

I saw a few different casting letters and marks on these tracks that i have not seen on Ford track. Could it be the Swiss made their molds from existing Canadian or British track?

I have not knocked the pin end cap off the T-16 to see what holds it on. I assume underneath it is the track pins with the cotter pin hole that we procure from the US. I guess I could (and will) pop that one pin back through that has worked part way through and see what is in there.

When I get back to work, I'll get some better shots of the various cast marks on the swiss track.


Just guessing here, but could it be that the swiss wanted a better system of end caps than the British/Canadian track used. They may have narrowed the track to accommodate for the thicker end cap. There is not a lot of room to spare around the fenders...I have seen front fender skirts that show wear from the track rubbing on them.

Last edited by rob love; 22-04-20 at 07:13.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 23-04-20, 03:02
rob love rob love is offline
carrier mech
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Shilo MB, the armpit of Canada
Posts: 7,610
Default Pin photos

Here are a couple of shots showing the shorter Swiss pin and a regular Cdn pin. The track link is the regular width Canadian type.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSCF0001 (5).jpg (590.7 KB, 2 views)
File Type: jpg DSCF0002 (5).jpg (683.7 KB, 2 views)
File Type: jpg DSCF0003 (4).jpg (485.6 KB, 1 views)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Carrier Pedal Variations Lynn Eades The Carrier Forum 19 02-05-19 10:06
Track adjusting cam variations BCA The Carrier Forum 5 04-05-16 06:01
Heads Up: Carrier Track matilda IIA For Sale Or Wanted 2 08-03-13 16:06
Mk 1 firing rest variations BCA The Carrier Forum 2 24-07-12 15:55
Carrier track Euan McDonald The Carrier Forum 4 12-06-07 08:17


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 20:59.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016