MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Carrier Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 18-12-08, 03:03
Ledsel's Avatar
Ledsel Ledsel is offline
Taisto Hako-oja
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Myrnam Alberta Canada
Posts: 314
Default

It's possible that it is the original as it has the cast iron intake. There is a engine no. on the top left rear of the engine. It's between the intake and the head, there is a flat surface there, right beside the feul pump base, and being a MKII it should start with a "T"
__________________
Model U.C. NO-2 MK II.*
SERIAL 25680
HULL 24699. LOWER HULL 24742. ENGINE TL-26707-F.
C.D. 2609.
BUILT MAR. 25, 1944.
CT 266677
Former WASP
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 18-12-08, 03:14
Ledsel's Avatar
Ledsel Ledsel is offline
Taisto Hako-oja
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Myrnam Alberta Canada
Posts: 314
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ledsel View Post
It's possible that it is the original as it has the cast iron intake. There is a engine no. on the top left rear of the engine. It's between the intake and the head, there is a flat surface there, right beside the feul pump base, and being a MKII it should start with a "T"
Do the water pumps still have double pulleys ?
__________________
Model U.C. NO-2 MK II.*
SERIAL 25680
HULL 24699. LOWER HULL 24742. ENGINE TL-26707-F.
C.D. 2609.
BUILT MAR. 25, 1944.
CT 266677
Former WASP
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 18-12-08, 09:25
RichardT10829's Avatar
RichardT10829 RichardT10829 is offline
Richard Harrison
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cullercoats Newcastle Upon Tyne United Kingdom
Posts: 3,068
Default

a good way of telling what the engine is, is by counting the head studs as they are different per BHP i cant think off the top of my head what each is, i will grab my service books and let you know.

The Mk2's are slightly more common but nevetheless any working Bren these days are getting harder and harder to come by.

Richard
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 18-12-08, 10:31
RichardT10829's Avatar
RichardT10829 RichardT10829 is offline
Richard Harrison
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cullercoats Newcastle Upon Tyne United Kingdom
Posts: 3,068
Default

right i have had a read and reminded myself. the 85bhp commonly associated with the carrier No.2 (mk1 and 2) and the 95bhp associated with Carrier No.3 Mk 2 have 24 head studs and 14mm spark plugs. the older Mk1's only had 65Bhp engines in (if they were British) that said all the engines were interchangeable so it is not uncommon to find an old carrier with a 95Bhp lump in it is however important that you make note of what you have in the carrier as the components of the 85/95 bhp engines are totally different to the others.

speak to Kevin Powles who can provide you with a service manual at a good price ! if he cant or has none left come back to me and i will sort you one fella.

cheers

Richard
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 19-12-08, 01:10
Phill Phill is offline
Philip
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Belleville
Posts: 75
Default

My son did a search on 'Central Command' and we dreamed about where that carrier might have been.

We didn't take the tarps off today to find the engine # but now I know where to look. An elderly acquaintance of mine came by today, so I showed him the snow covered shape. By gosh he knew what it was, I couldn't believe it, then he said "Is that the 85 hp engine?"

Knowing where the hull # was really helped. We think the # is 27418.

Attached a picture of the water pump pulleys. I have never seen a distributor up front like that, except on the Ford tractors. I don't think they were very popular for maintenance work. Phil
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Bren 5.jpg (71.1 KB, 54 views)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 19-12-08, 02:35
Ledsel's Avatar
Ledsel Ledsel is offline
Taisto Hako-oja
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Myrnam Alberta Canada
Posts: 314
Default

Buy the looks of your hull no. It was probably built around late April or May 1944. And for the dist. they were fairly easily taken off to be worked on. Just pull the caps and three bolts They cannot be put back on the wrong way as they will only fit one way. There is a slot that it fits in and it's set to one side. Your carrier is a little bit newer than mine as my hull no. is 24742. Your engine no. should be some where around TL 29-----F ?. Serial no. maybe 28----? just a wild guess but perhaps close. Buy the way there are two hull no.s but your upper no. is long gone. Buy the looks of that engine I would say there is a fairly good chance that it is still the original, as I doubt if it was ever over seas.
__________________
Model U.C. NO-2 MK II.*
SERIAL 25680
HULL 24699. LOWER HULL 24742. ENGINE TL-26707-F.
C.D. 2609.
BUILT MAR. 25, 1944.
CT 266677
Former WASP

Last edited by Ledsel; 19-12-08 at 02:46.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 19-12-08, 02:52
Ledsel's Avatar
Ledsel Ledsel is offline
Taisto Hako-oja
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Myrnam Alberta Canada
Posts: 314
Default

One way to know if it's a carrier engine is it should have two large oil lines at the rear left of the engine just behind the place where the engine no. is. They may have been pluged off if the oil cooler is diconnected. I can't tell from the picture as it is on the left rear. If it has just small plugs then it is an automobile engine. I see that the engine has a few modern upgrades like the starter is the automatic bendix instead of the mechanical one, a remote coil, a car carburator, and an alternater.
__________________
Model U.C. NO-2 MK II.*
SERIAL 25680
HULL 24699. LOWER HULL 24742. ENGINE TL-26707-F.
C.D. 2609.
BUILT MAR. 25, 1944.
CT 266677
Former WASP

Last edited by Ledsel; 19-12-08 at 03:02.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 06:41.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016