Is this a common book?

[Tony Smith]

Originally Posted by Bob Carriere

Being old fashion, I still like to have a "hard paper" copy of manuals.... especially the MB - C2 which I have as a repro and an original.

The CD does have it's merits....... becaue Clive had access to original hi - res archival pictures from FORD of Canada on his CD ...... That level of resolution his rarely found on the cheap CD sold on EBay for example.

BooB

The availability of any printed repro manual relies on the integrity of the repro'er as to how accurate and complete a copy you get.

It is possible to purchase from a variety of sources a hardbound copy of the "Ford Service Bulletins", the loose-leaf, bound technical references supplied by Ford to their service agents. These cover a variety of subjects and offer information on specs and tolerances, changes to components and helpful suggestions on maintaining Ford Vehicles. Unfortunately, the reprints tend to be the US version, and do not have the details of differences of Canadian produced vehicles. I have bought a 400 page Repro copy of the US Bulletins and there is much info missing that is in my original 750 page copy of the Canadian bulletins. That may be because the original copier of the US book chose not to include info they thought irrelevant, or their copy of the book may not have contained that information originally. The Service Bulletins predate the publication of the "Special Vehicles" and "MB-F1" manuals, so they contain gems of information relevant to the first Ford CMPs, MCPs and other military vehicles that are simply not contained in the repro books. (David,you might be interested in the Date of the info on the Transfer Case? )

Other Repro books that I have contain blatant errors and emissions, and once you make that realisation, you tend to distrust the info they contain as being an accurate representation of the original. Aussie Carrier owners will be aware of the LP2A Parts book with the missing page 13, and there is also a repro of the Boys Anti-Tank rifle book that has re-made the front cover to include a major spelling error! When you know they've gone to some lengths to doctor the cover, you tend to wonder what else has been altered within.

[David_Hayward (RIP)]

As I am ignorant about these things and so much more, is that a Ford case in the Novermber 1940-dated page please? Or GM?

[cliff]

Originally Posted by David_Hayward

As I am ignorant about these things and so much more, is that a Ford case in the Novermber 1940-dated page please? Or GM?

I'd have thought it was a FORD case as it is pictured in a FORD service bulletin!

[Tony Smith]

Originally Posted by David_Hayward

Is that a Ford case in the Novermber 1940-dated page please? Or GM?

The Bulletin does not specify the origin, design or manufacturer (Timken, McKinnons, etc) but deals more with "This is how it works, this is how to fix it". The cases are identical inside and it is just a casting mark that distinguishes the two "Brands" of case.

[David_Hayward (RIP)]

Regrettably Fords used McKinnon-built transfer cases, especially in the 1940 Model year production, as Windsor Axle Plant was not equipped to build them, whereas the St Catherines plant had the benefit of GM licences. Of course the initial intention was that say Fords would say, supply cabs for both companies and GM other components. However this was abandoned as impractical pretty rapidly.