MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Restoration Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 29-10-09, 10:18
Lynn Eades Lynn Eades is offline
Bluebell
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand
Posts: 5,541
Default Phil

Surely you must be able to purchase something you can inlude in your rig, an element, with a known failure rate, or measues the load. Something in your rope behind the hook, that gives you a load measurement, regardless of how many layers of rope are on the drum.
__________________
Bluebell

Carrier Armoured O.P. No1 Mk3 W. T84991
Carrier Bren No2.Mk.I. NewZealand Railways. NZR.6.
Dodge WC55. 37mm Gun Motor Carriage M6
Jeep Mb #135668
So many questions....
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 29-10-09, 23:29
Keith Webb's Avatar
Keith Webb Keith Webb is offline
Film maker, CMP addict
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: HIGHTON VIC
Posts: 8,218
Default Winch rating

On Australian CMPs fitted with the standard chassis mounted winch there was a brass data plate added which gave the rated load as 7,000 lb not twice that. From memory the Servex winch fitted here to the C60X and some wreckers was rated higher.

The attached pic is of a winch plate on a F60L cab 12 which Ganmain Tony may recognise.

__________________
Film maker

42 FGT No8 (Aust) remains
42 FGT No9 (Aust)
42 F15
Keith Webb
Macleod, Victoria Australia
Also Canadian Military Pattern Vehicles group on Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/groups/canadianmilitarypattern
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 29-10-09, 23:35
Keith Orpin Keith Orpin is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Oxford,UK
Posts: 361
Default

Hi Phil et al,
The only info I have found so far came from Maintenance manual MB-C2W, dated Sept 1943. In sub-section O, there is an 8 page section on the winch. On page O7 the spec of the winch is given, see attached picture of part of this page, showing the 14500 figure (actually, it's shown in Tons).
Hope this helps, and let me know if you require any more pictures
All the best,
Keith
Attached Images
File Type: jpg MB-C2W.jpg (107.0 KB, 28 views)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 30-10-09, 02:09
Phil Waterman Phil Waterman is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Temple, New Hampshire, USA
Posts: 3,929
Default Well that's two conflicting answers

Well that's two conflicting answers that only deepens the mystery. First thanks to everybody for trying to find a definitive answer.

Keith you found the rating that I remembered, kind of interesting that it gives it in tons. Which leaves us with long tons 2240 lbs or short ton 2000 lbs both are used in manuals CMPs sometimes with no indication of which. So that would give us a capacity of 14.5 tons which could be 32,480 lbs or 29,000 lbs a significant variance. I suspect that this breaking strength of cable and I suspect the figure on the data plate Keith found of 7500 lbs is the working load lifting load.

The wide variance in these figures is why I asked the question in the first place, because as has been pointed out the winch system is only as strong as the weakest part. Which if and when it breaks release all the energy stored in unspooled cable which can be considerable.

Bob as to the suggestion of a electric winch, where would be the challenge in that besides as you will note in the picture I've mounted a hydraulic lifting arm on the truck already 500-1000 lbs capacity with a 1750 lbs Warn electric winch. This is very useful for loading engines, steel beams etc into the truck. (much better than my back)

Half the fun (justification) for having three trucks is using them, being a little older and wisher I hope using with out breaking or wearing a bit of winch gear.

For now I think I will go with the approach of improving all my load attachment gear, ie chains, load straps, scotch cables up to atleast 12,000 lbs to match the snatch block I have. The point raised by Grant and hrpearce about load chaining the truck down. I think I'll go with letting the holding power of the scotches and engine at high idle be the load limiters.

I'll keep you posted on what I find.

But it would really be interesting to find a real answers to the design capacity of CMP winches. Or is this another case of they designed as heavy as they could and hoped it would be strong enough to do the job in the field.

On last point the long chassis with winch doesn't use the flex joint found on the 101 wheelbase units. It has all normal drive shafts though they are a little lighter design than the regular drive shafts.

Pictures of winch work to follow.
__________________
Phil Waterman
`41 C60L Pattern 12
`42 C60S Radio Pattern 13
`45 HUP
http://canadianmilitarypattern.com/
New e-mail Philip@canadianmilitarypattern.com
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 30-10-09, 02:52
Barry Churcher's Avatar
Barry Churcher Barry Churcher is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Castleton Ont.
Posts: 1,036
Default

Phil, I don't have the correct answer to your query but I do know that if the winches are heavily loaded the frame will twist before anything breaks. When I was working on my artillery tractor I went through three badly twisted chassis before I found a good one. The best chassis came from a truck that had spent it's life as a tow truck.
Cheers,
Barry
__________________

Every twenty minute job is one broken bolt away from a three day ordeal.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 30-10-09, 04:47
Grant Bowker Grant Bowker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 2,321
Default

Vol 4 of the AEDB Design Record lists the capacity for the chassis winch as "The maximum pull developed by this winch is 11,000 pounds with a ratio of 6.2 to 1 in the winch drive unit."
From the same source: "125 feet of 5/8" diameter cable was normally fitted on this drum."
Yet another, different answer.......
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 30-10-09, 07:48
Lynn Eades Lynn Eades is offline
Bluebell
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand
Posts: 5,541
Default Phil

Back then ,I would say your winch is rated in long tons. Short tons were used for shipping purposes.
Now Tony's going to say something profound
__________________
Bluebell

Carrier Armoured O.P. No1 Mk3 W. T84991
Carrier Bren No2.Mk.I. NewZealand Railways. NZR.6.
Dodge WC55. 37mm Gun Motor Carriage M6
Jeep Mb #135668
So many questions....

Last edited by Lynn Eades; 30-10-09 at 09:21.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 30-10-09, 08:02
Tony Smith's Avatar
Tony Smith Tony Smith is offline
No1, Mk 2** (I'm back!)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lithgow, NSW, Australia
Posts: 5,042
Default

Or we can try to calculate it?

The Ford Engine makes 178 ft lbs of torque. Multiply by 6.4:1 1st gear gives 1139.2 ft lbs. Multiply by the winch ratio of 6.66:1 gives 7587 ft lbs. What is the diameter of the winch drum? If we hypothetically say the layer of cable is 8 inches from the centreline if the drum (divide by .66), that gives us 11495 lbs of pull.

The Chev engine will have different torque (170 ft lbs @ 1200) and gear (7.058 to 1) figures, and the actual diameter of the drum needs to be measured, but are we in the ballpark?
__________________
You can help Keep Mapleleafup Up! See Here how you can help, and why you should!

Last edited by Tony Smith; 30-10-09 at 08:09.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 30-10-09, 19:59
Phil Waterman Phil Waterman is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Temple, New Hampshire, USA
Posts: 3,929
Default This truck had been used hard

Quote:
Originally Posted by Barry Churcher View Post
Phil, I don't have the correct answer to your query but I do know that if the winches are heavily loaded the frame will twist before anything breaks. When I was working on my artillery tractor I went through three badly twisted chassis before I found a good one. The best chassis came from a truck that had spent it's life as a tow truck.
Cheers,
Barry
Barry - You hit the nail on the head about hard use, this particular 1941 C60L had been hard used and abused. It spent part of its life building Mount Ascutney Ski Area in Vermont, from the cable reel frame on the back it was used to drag cable up the mountain. It had been rolled at one point bending the cab frame and brake peddle, the clutch housing had so many cracks in that when you tapped it with a hammer it went thud.

The winch guides all showed evidence of hard use and have actually been worn by the cable pulling across them. Given all that one of the first things I did was check all the diagonal measurements across the frame and the silly thing was straight and flat.

In parts of the world where there are multiple CMPs to choose from I'm sure that this one would have been considered a parts truck.
__________________
Phil Waterman
`41 C60L Pattern 12
`42 C60S Radio Pattern 13
`45 HUP
http://canadianmilitarypattern.com/
New e-mail Philip@canadianmilitarypattern.com
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 30-10-09, 20:27
Phil Waterman Phil Waterman is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Temple, New Hampshire, USA
Posts: 3,929
Default This truck had been used hard

Quote:
Originally Posted by Barry Churcher View Post
Phil, I don't have the correct answer to your query but I do know that if the winches are heavily loaded the frame will twist before anything breaks. When I was working on my artillery tractor I went through three badly twisted chassis before I found a good one. The best chassis came from a truck that had spent it's life as a tow truck.
Cheers,
Barry
Barry - You hit the nail on the head about hard use, this particular 1941 C60L had been hard used and abused. It spent part of its life building Mount Ascutney Ski Area in Vermont, from the cable reel frame on the back it was used to drag cable up the mountain. It had been rolled at one point bending the cab frame and brake peddle, the clutch housing had so many cracks in that when you tapped it with a hammer it went thud.

The winch guides all showed evidence of hard use and have actually been worn by the cable pulling across them. Given all that one of the first things I did was check all the diagonal measurements across the frame and the silly thing was straight and flat.

In parts of the world where there are multiple CMPs to choose from I'm sure that this one would have been considered a parts truck.
__________________
Phil Waterman
`41 C60L Pattern 12
`42 C60S Radio Pattern 13
`45 HUP
http://canadianmilitarypattern.com/
New e-mail Philip@canadianmilitarypattern.com
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 18:23.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016