MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Carrier Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 23-08-10, 17:30
RichardT10829's Avatar
RichardT10829 RichardT10829 is offline
Richard Harrison
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cullercoats Newcastle Upon Tyne United Kingdom
Posts: 3,069
Default

keep up the good work buddy.... i hated the strip down phase of my carrier everything was seized solid ! but its done now so thats the main thing
__________________
is mos redintegro

__5th Div___46th Div__
1942 Ford Universal Carrier No.3 MkI*
Lower Hull No. 10131
War Department CT54508 (SOLD)
1944 Ford Universal Carrier MkII* (under restoration).
1944 Morris C8 radio body (under restoration).
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 24-08-10, 22:34
ajmac's Avatar
ajmac ajmac is offline
Alastair McMurray
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Lincoln, England
Posts: 434
Default Chassis Number

I found the chassis number just where Paul suggested.... well after some cleaning and sanding. From the number I presume that it was made by Ford or Wolsley as only these two manufactures made more than 3979 units. Of course that is if the chassis number started at 0 for a contact, and that is by no means sure. However I hope that I may be able to trace the number either in the disposal records (kew?) or the Belgian army records, we will have to see. Any opinions or clues welcome.

You will also see that due to range damage the left hand front chassis rail where the number is located was detached once the front axle had been removed.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg ChassisNo.jpg (46.3 KB, 68 views)
File Type: jpg ChassisRail.jpg (39.1 KB, 70 views)
File Type: jpg FrontPlateRemoved.jpg (73.8 KB, 67 views)
__________________
Alastair
Lincoln, UK.


Under Restoration:
1944 No2 MK2 Loyd Carrier - Tracked Towing
1944 Ford WOT6 Lorry


The Loyd on Facebook

Last edited by ajmac; 24-08-10 at 22:39.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 25-08-10, 09:25
tankbarrell tankbarrell is offline
Adrian Barrell
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Suffolk, UK
Posts: 860
Default

It was not at all uncommon for a manufacturer to start at a higher number than 0. The contract cards at Bovington may list chassis numbers though it's unlikely.
__________________
Adrian Barrell
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 27-08-10, 09:11
paul visser's Avatar
paul visser paul visser is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: the netherlands, Nieuwe Niedorp
Posts: 104
Default

my number is 1474 build by M.B. Wild. and the war dep.nr is T136474 the last 3 are the same as the chassis number. it might be of any help.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg P1050749.jpg (62.0 KB, 89 views)
__________________
Fox MK1 1942
Austin 10 staff car 1945
Bedford QLR wireless (Canadian)
M7B1 "Priest" 105mm howitzer

WW2 Museum https://www.facebook.com/collectie
WW2 Canadian and American re-enactor
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 27-08-10, 09:49
tankbarrell tankbarrell is offline
Adrian Barrell
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Suffolk, UK
Posts: 860
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by paul visser View Post
my number is 1474 build by M.B. Wild. and the war dep.nr is T136474 the last 3 are the same as the chassis number. it might be of any help.
Part of contract T/M11245 with M B Wild.

156 TPC No1 Mk 2 T136016-T136171
814 TT No1 Mk2 T136172-T136985

I wonder if they started with chassis number 1016? Seems unlikely but presumably the contracts were issued with WD numbers on them so it's possible.

Maybe just a coincidence....
__________________
Adrian Barrell
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 27-08-10, 10:32
Lynn Eades Lynn Eades is offline
Bluebell
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand
Posts: 5,541
Default Adrian

May be they started at 5000?....... How did you get 1016? ( May be I'm mathematically challenged?)
__________________
Bluebell

Carrier Armoured O.P. No1 Mk3 W. T84991
Carrier Bren No2.Mk.I. NewZealand Railways. NZR.6.
Dodge WC55. 37mm Gun Motor Carriage M6
Jeep Mb #135668
So many questions....
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 27-08-10, 12:13
tankbarrell tankbarrell is offline
Adrian Barrell
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Suffolk, UK
Posts: 860
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lynn Eades View Post
May be they started at 5000?....... How did you get 1016? ( May be I'm mathematically challenged?)

Well perhaps but I meant 5016 as Pauls chassis number is 5000 behind the last four of the WD number and Wild started with (13)6016 that would equate to 5016 to maintain the tie up......It was early, my brain hadn't fully warmed up....
However, I suspect it is coincidence. You would need a sample over a range to know for sure.
__________________
Adrian Barrell

Last edited by tankbarrell; 27-08-10 at 12:24.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 27-08-10, 11:52
paul visser's Avatar
paul visser paul visser is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: the netherlands, Nieuwe Niedorp
Posts: 104
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tankbarrell View Post
Part of contract T/M11245 with M B Wild.

156 TPC No1 Mk 2 T136016-T136171
814 TT No1 Mk2 T136172-T136985

I wonder if they started with chassis number 1016? Seems unlikely but presumably the contracts were issued with WD numbers on them so it's possible.

Maybe just a coincidence....
That could be possible i dont know. But it looks like it.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg P1040731.jpg (74.9 KB, 35 views)
__________________
Fox MK1 1942
Austin 10 staff car 1945
Bedford QLR wireless (Canadian)
M7B1 "Priest" 105mm howitzer

WW2 Museum https://www.facebook.com/collectie
WW2 Canadian and American re-enactor
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 19:55.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016