|
|
#13
20-01-11, 15:55
|
||||
|
||||
I can understand the theory here although I still question the logic. By no means do I think that our Forces don't warrant new vehs, rather I question in times of tight economy the idea of buying job specific vehs rather than ones that are able to cover many tasks....
Rob you stated that these were being used as logistics vehs with training in tactical roles. I would hate to get stuck in a traffic jam in a tight alley with a bunch of insurgents firing from rooftops.... Lessons learned the hardway by troops in the US Forces in Iraq trapped in HMMVWs and 5 and 10 tonners...
__________________
3RD Echelon Wksp 1968 M274A5 Mule Baifield USMC 1966 M274A2 Mule BMY USMC 1966 M274A2 Mule BMY USMC 1958 M274 Mule Willys US Army 1970 M38A1 CDN3 70-08715 1 CSR 1943 Converto Airborne Trailer 1983 M1009 CUCV 1957 Triumph TRW 500cc RT-524, PRC-77s, and trucks and stuff and more stuff and and....... OMVA, MVPA, G503, Steel Soldiers 
|
|
|
Threaded Mode