MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Armour Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 22-11-11, 17:47
Mike Cecil Mike Cecil is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cody, Wyoming, USA
Posts: 2,372
Default

Hi Matt,

Oberon warming up yet after the winter chill???

The AC1 plate: number should be in the range 8001 to 8065 (but it sure does look like a '7', I agree!). The AC3 was 8066.

The Bellfield AC3 was built on one of the many AC3 hulls cast for the project, but never used. Most were scrapped. John recovered his from the Holsworthy Range where it had been used for anti-armour training. As a consequence, a whole lower side panel had to be replaced: no mean effort on a cast tank hull!

As a consequence (of the hull never actually having been built as a 'tank'), I'm not sure I would include it in the list of 'survivors'.

Mike C
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 22-11-11, 20:25
Ryan's Avatar
Ryan Ryan is offline
Blitzed
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Golden Plains, Victoria, Oz
Posts: 2,208
Default hull no.

8072?? even though the 8 looks like a 3. Or is the 7 an upside down 4?...with a bit missing.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 23-11-11, 07:32
matilda IIA matilda IIA is offline
Matt McMahon
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oberon NSW
Posts: 180
Default

Hi Guys

The plate is hard to read, (and I have the original photo)

It may read, AC1. No. 8072 or 3072
HULL No BKH48
AH.F. No 57
TLF&E. _ _ _ . MG, Unsure about this line.
_ K _. 70 Unsure about this also


The vehicle is south of sydney, if I am back that way I will take a better photo !

Hi Mike, Very cold and wet here at the moment, great weather to be in the shed working on a real tank.....

Kind regards
Matt
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 23-11-11, 07:39
Luke R Luke R is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Gippsland, Vic
Posts: 289
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by matilda IIA View Post
working on a real tank.....
Matt
them fighting words...lol
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 23-11-11, 07:50
Ryan's Avatar
Ryan Ryan is offline
Blitzed
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Golden Plains, Victoria, Oz
Posts: 2,208
Default scale

Hey guys there's nothing wrong with 1/35 scale. Spent much time building and glueing and painting. Good to look at but not to sit in, they don't last long that way.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 23-11-11, 07:56
matilda IIA matilda IIA is offline
Matt McMahon
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oberon NSW
Posts: 180
Default

Some photos of one of Johns tanks before the turret was fitted,



Kind regards
Matt
Attached Images
File Type: jpg scan0001.jpg (61.7 KB, 86 views)
File Type: jpg scan0002.jpg (54.4 KB, 85 views)
File Type: jpg scan0003.jpg (59.8 KB, 88 views)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 23-11-11, 17:55
Mike Cecil Mike Cecil is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cody, Wyoming, USA
Posts: 2,372
Default

Well, Luke R, that's the beauty of a democracy: we are each allowed to have our views ... on most things, anyway.

Matt: I'd be surprised if its actually 8072: as I said, the Sentinel range was 8001 to 8065, so next time your at KA's, give it a scrub and see if it becomes any clearer (I'm sure he won't mind). Warmer here today: snows even melted, but it is a grey day. I can't retreat to a tank in the shed, alas, I'll just have to do some more 'paperwork' stuff. How's that hanky? Still looking after it well?

Mike C
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 23-11-11, 07:17
Luke R Luke R is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Gippsland, Vic
Posts: 289
Default AC3 hull

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Cecil View Post
The Bellfield AC3 was built on one of the many AC3 hulls cast for the project, but never used. Most were scrapped. John recovered his from the Holsworthy Range where it had been used for anti-armour training. As a consequence, a whole lower side panel had to be replaced: no mean effort on a cast tank hull!

As a consequence (of the hull never actually having been built as a 'tank'), I'm not sure I would include it in the list of 'survivors'.

Mike C
I disagree Mike,
It would be one thing if John made a replica hull or modified the hull of a AC1 to look like the AC3, but it still was cast a AC3 hull during the 40's like every other AC hull.
Its like if i built a Spitfire out of NOS.
Is it a Spitfire? yes
Did it serve or have any history? no

Luke
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 11:16.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016