MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > BUY, TRADE or SELL > For Sale Or Wanted

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-03-13, 23:19
oldlithgow's Avatar
oldlithgow oldlithgow is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Cold Lake AB
Posts: 86
Default

Mike,
Thanks for the information, In Canada you can find numerous Lithgows but it is rare to find a .22. Mine currently has no markings on the stock and is sitting in later era Coachwood. I am happy with it right now but it would be nice to have one of the nicely marked ones.
__________________
Craig Harris
1953 M100 CDN 53-71203
1968 M38A1 CDN2 67-08470
1970 M38A1 CDN3 70-08790
Cold Lake AB
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-03-13, 04:45
Tony Smith's Avatar
Tony Smith Tony Smith is offline
No1, Mk 2** (I'm back!)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lithgow, NSW, Australia
Posts: 5,042
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oldlithgow View Post
Mine currently has no markings on the stock and is sitting in later era Coachwood.
It is hardly likely to be later wood. SMLE production finished in 1954, and the factory then concentrated on FTR repair work before retooling for the L1A1 SLR.

Unlike the .22 Hornet rifles of that period which were completely made from new components for commercial sale, virtually all of the woodwork (and the actions) for the No2 MkIV* .22 rifles were recycled from earlier built No1 MkIII (or MkIII*) rifles.
__________________
You can help Keep Mapleleafup Up! See Here how you can help, and why you should!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-03-13, 05:55
Mike Cecil Mike Cecil is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cody, Wyoming, USA
Posts: 2,372
Default

Have to agree with Tony on that one: Coachwood was the latter standard for SMLE stocks, but any rifle going though FTR conversion to .22 could well have been re-equipped with a new set, or partial set, of woodwork to replace any 'dinged' parts. I remember examining many rifles during the last sales of .303 SMLE rifles and noting the mixture of timber parts, especially on rifles that were marked FTR. Walnut, coachwood, or Queensland Maple - made no difference to the assembler who wasn't looking for pretty matched timber, just a complete and functional rifle. There were literally thousands of sets of spare coachwood timber held in Defence stores for years, so they were certainly available if required for the FTR rifles in the 1950s.

Fortunately I ended up with an early 1920s Lithgow .303 SMLE with matching numbers, woodwork AND a WW1 issue hessian rifle bag, still new in its paper wrapping, from the armoury at Bandiana. (in the days when the Federal Govt still sold off firearms to the public!)

Mike C
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-03-13, 18:26
charlie fitton's Avatar
charlie fitton charlie fitton is offline
HLIofC - Normandy Pl
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Maryhill Ontario
Posts: 943
Default .22s

Odd "Oldlithgow", I think I have one of these in the basement too. Looks like a no 1, but .22.

i know there's a No2 short .22. Ironicaly with the 2400 yard sights on the side.

Personally - I'm looking for c No7 bits. I have an unmarked bolt and receiver, and a barrel. Now to find some pretty wood.(That sounds so bad when said by a guy...) I mean FURNITURE... that sounds almost as bad...

f
__________________
Charles Fitton
Maryhill On.,
Canada

too many carriers
too many rovers
not enough time.
(and now a BSA...)
(and now a Triumph TRW...)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 03:55.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016