MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Carrier Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 30-06-13, 09:39
Peter Walsh's Avatar
Peter Walsh Peter Walsh is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Ipswich, Qld, Australia
Posts: 18
Default Loyd Slave Battery Carrier

Just had a quick look through a couple of books, "Fallen Sentinel" and "The Vital Factor", and they mention that the Loyd Slave Battery Carriers were used in the armoured regiments, one per squadron. I assume that means there were more than 30 of them in Australia. Were they the only Loyds used in Australia and what happened to them i.e were they sold off like the LP2a's?

Curious,

Peter
__________________
SAR LP2A 2554 (restoring)
GPW Jeep
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 30-06-13, 10:18
Richard Farrant's Avatar
Richard Farrant Richard Farrant is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Kent, England
Posts: 3,641
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Walsh View Post
Just had a quick look through a couple of books, "Fallen Sentinel" and "The Vital Factor", and they mention that the Loyd Slave Battery Carriers were used in the armoured regiments, one per squadron. I assume that means there were more than 30 of them in Australia. Were they the only Loyds used in Australia and what happened to them i.e were they sold off like the LP2a's?

Curious,

Peter
Peter,
According to an old guide book from Pucka' Tank museum, "about 50 were used in Australia", this was the Starting and Charging version. No mention of other versions.

regards, Richard
__________________
Richard

1943 Bedford QLD lorry - 1941 BSA WM20 m/cycle - 1943 Daimler Scout Car Mk2
Member of MVT, IMPS, MVG of NSW, KVE and AMVCS
KVE President & KVE News Editor
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 30-06-13, 13:26
shaun shaun is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: uk
Posts: 528
Default

Yeah spot on guys , definitely Loyd - I have just checked it against the axle I gave in the yard. Point to not they are no good for carriers . But the sprockets are .
__________________
Shaun Hindle

Morris C8
Ford GPW jeep 1945
Morris 1000 (ex mil)
SAS LSV
Harley Davidson MT 350 motor cycle
Universal carrier MK 1*1943 Ronson (under restoration)
Universal carrier MK 2* 1944 (Puddle Jumper HSK 345)
Ferret MK 1/1 1956
Ferret MK 2/4 1958
CVR(T) Scorpion
432 MK2
Daimler MK1 armoured car 1943
(winner best wheeled armour W&P show 2011)
Daimler Dingo MK2 1944 (awaiting restoration, aquired 11/12/2011)
Fordson WOT 3 D 1940 (awaiting restoration )
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 30-06-13, 22:34
ajmac's Avatar
ajmac ajmac is offline
Alastair McMurray
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Lincoln, England
Posts: 434
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shaun View Post
Point to not they are no good for carriers . But the sprockets are .
Good point, Loyd Drums and back plates are unique to Loyds, that was the 'big mod' that brought about the MK2. I have read a wartime report concerning the early Loyds which criticises them for terrible brake fade (steering was no longer possible) after a very short period of driving. Those early ones had the truck braking system similar in performance to a Universal Carrier drum setup. It was that bad that all MK1s were retrofited with the Girling uprated system from the MK2 in the field.
__________________
Alastair
Lincoln, UK.


Under Restoration:
1944 No2 MK2 Loyd Carrier - Tracked Towing
1944 Ford WOT6 Lorry


The Loyd on Facebook
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-07-13, 01:24
Lynn Eades Lynn Eades is offline
Bluebell
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand
Posts: 5,541
Default

Alastair, just to clarify, you are talking MkI and MkII Loyds. Nothing to do with a difference between Mki and MkII U.C. brakes correct?
__________________
Bluebell

Carrier Armoured O.P. No1 Mk3 W. T84991
Carrier Bren No2.Mk.I. NewZealand Railways. NZR.6.
Dodge WC55. 37mm Gun Motor Carriage M6
Jeep Mb #135668
So many questions....
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-07-13, 08:22
ajmac's Avatar
ajmac ajmac is offline
Alastair McMurray
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Lincoln, England
Posts: 434
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lynn Eades View Post
Alastair, just to clarify, you are talking MkI and MkII Loyds. Nothing to do with a difference between Mki and MkII U.C. brakes correct?
Thats right Lynn, MK1 and MK2 Loyd Carriers, I don't think UC brakes had any major changes through the Mks did they? Loyds have another rather important set of improvements but that doesn't appear to have been captured officially. Early & Late MK2s is the best way to describe them, however, I don't know what year early changed to late.
__________________
Alastair
Lincoln, UK.


Under Restoration:
1944 No2 MK2 Loyd Carrier - Tracked Towing
1944 Ford WOT6 Lorry


The Loyd on Facebook

Last edited by ajmac; 01-07-13 at 08:27.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-07-13, 11:29
Bob McNeill Bob McNeill is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Orange, NSW Australia
Posts: 465
Default hub

This is where some of the bits went, spotted at Dubbo Truck and Tractor display.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg dubbo10 124.jpg (78.6 KB, 41 views)
File Type: jpg dubbo10 123.jpg (63.8 KB, 40 views)
File Type: jpg dubbo10 126.jpg (53.6 KB, 41 views)
__________________
macca C15 C15A
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 21:13.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016