![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
No argument there Michael !
![]()
__________________
Richard 1943 Bedford QLD lorry - 1941 BSA WM20 m/cycle - 1943 Daimler Scout Car Mk2 Member of MVT, IMPS, MVG of NSW, KVE and AMVCS KVE President & KVE News Editor |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You can call it what you like but it is a engineered speced machine cut thread
it could have been any thread 14/16/18 what every but it is still a 7/8 -14 thread machine cut and not with a die just like lots of equipment are built with none standard sizes and threads the BS is the only part that is right ![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The things people write to get out of a $6.98 CAD lunch special.
There are no emoticons for someone stirring the pot. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I have one of those Die's if you need one Ross.
__________________
is mos redintegro __5th Div___46th Div__ 1942 Ford Universal Carrier No.3 MkI* Lower Hull No. 10131 War Department CT54508 (SOLD) 1944 Ford Universal Carrier MkII* (under restoration). 1944 Morris C8 radio body (under restoration). |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stew, there is more to this, and it is the evolutionary aspect
Vickers Carden Loyd built the predecessors to the carriers we know. VCL was a British company, who would naturally use British engineering standards. Pre war they were working with the French, in development work. I cannot recall for sure and could well be corrected here, but I think that is where the metric sized plate came from. If not, It is where VCL sourced their plate from. Many things have rolled on through. As an example, the petrol cap on the Carrier fuel tanks was the earlier engine oil filler cap in the Vickers tanks. The Vickers tank track Became the standard from which Australian carrier track came, which later became the basis for Windsor track. I would suggest the Americans had a close look at the construction of the Australian LP1, and transferred features to the T16. The metric steel plate went right through the carrier family (as far as I know) If you want to check into the threads further, from memory the British thread will have a 55 degree included angle with a flat root, and radiused crest, while the American threads will typically be 60 degree included angle with a flat root and crest. As Paul has eluded to, BSP ( particularly tapered) is a a very common thread form used all around the planet, more common that NPT. Michael R has cleared this up for me, as I had previously disregarded BSP as a contender for the axle thread. This little line is great: The greatest cause of non observation, is preconceived opinion Here is another thing to think about. The British inch, and the American inch were different lengths until about 1941, because they each arrived there by different methods. (If your machinists book has a green cover, Stew, it might be in there. mine is about 5 or 6 thousand kms away)
__________________
Bluebell Carrier Armoured O.P. No1 Mk3 W. T84991 Carrier Bren No2.Mk.I. NewZealand Railways. NZR.6. Dodge WC55. 37mm Gun Motor Carriage M6 Jeep Mb #135668 So many questions.... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes mine has a green cover and that is why most women
![]() |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
British pipe sizes are designated BSP.Tr for tapered threads, and BSP.Pl for parallel threads. Pipe sizes are the same both sides of the pond, and there is no 7/8 pipe.
There is however a BSP.F thread that is similar to our NS(National Special) series of thread. The BSP that is being referred to for the spindle threads is the BSP.F, 7/8-14 which has a O.D. of 1.189in. The BSP.F series of thread uses the same nominal diameters as the British pipe schedule, but have added a few sizes in between the standard pipe sizes to give a better range of thread sizes. Perry |
![]() |
|
|