![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It originally came from the collection of Michel Leloup who owned the Falaise museum in Normandy. For many years it was at his woodyard near Aigle with another Otter, his Panther and the remains of several other vehicles.
When this closed down it was moved up to the museum and was stored behind the museum. On his death it went into the auction in May. Mr Leloup rescued many vehicles from around Normandy and he told me this was one of them. It has bomb damage to the roof, a shrapnel hole in the drivers footwell which you can see from the photo and also the fuel tank has exploded. Big question now is what to do with the damage?
__________________
C15 TA 1944 Ford Lynx 1945 C8A HUP 1943 Willys MB Jeep 1942 New Zealand pattern wheeled carrier 1943 (project1) New Zealand pattern wheeled carrier 1943 (project2) |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Good to see you have it in the UK now! Re. the damage, I like your idea to restore it and preserve the damage (as discussed during "Beltring-on-Sea"). If that proves impractical - or impossible to drive - I would carry out the repairs as they would have done during WW2 as per the REME manual provided by Richard. They would still be very visible and serve as a poignant reminder of the damages of war. Hanno
__________________
Regards, Hanno -------------------------- |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Hanno,
At the moment it looks like it will be driveable as is, If a little breezy! However I do like your suggestion. I will post some pictures of the damage tomorrow so you can get a better idea. James
__________________
C15 TA 1944 Ford Lynx 1945 C8A HUP 1943 Willys MB Jeep 1942 New Zealand pattern wheeled carrier 1943 (project1) New Zealand pattern wheeled carrier 1943 (project2) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's always a tricky one. I don't agree with those who leave range damage and say ''it's part of the vehicles history'' when they have restored it to an in service condition, i.e. before it's time as a target.
Similarly, removing real battle damage seems a shame but sometimes it can be too bad to leave unrepaired. I like Hanno's suggestion, not something I'd considered before! ![]()
__________________
Adrian Barrell |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Leaving range damage is like not repairing after a car accident or years of neglect. It was not "earned" legitimately. Battle damage is another category altogether. For example, some fellows I know are working on a Saracen armoured car. It suffered from split welds, water ingress and rust damage. But, after priming they found a bullet-like gouge in the plate beside the driver's hatch. This vehicle was used in Northern Ireland, so it is not unimaginable that some unhappy Irishman fired a shot at it.
In the case of the Otter, I like the suggestion replicating the Battle Damage Repair techniques. The inventive use of existing or salvaged parts to make urgent repairs should be the story, not the question of how it was damaged.
__________________
Terry Warner - 74-????? M151A2 - 70-08876 M38A1 - 53-71233 M100CDN trailer Beware! The Green Disease walks among us! |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Strewth James, you're a glutton for punishment!
Well done, its certainly in the right hands what ever you decide to do ![]() Must be starting to get a bit chilly over your way now too
__________________
Pax Vobiscum.......may you eat three meals a day & have regular bowel movements. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Tony,
The day I picked it up, we woke up to snow on the ground and a 5 hour blizzard. Most unusual for Normandy! I think I beat my best loading time that day, 30 minutes from ramps down to loaded and strapped ready for home. A bit warmer with you I think? James ![]()
__________________
C15 TA 1944 Ford Lynx 1945 C8A HUP 1943 Willys MB Jeep 1942 New Zealand pattern wheeled carrier 1943 (project1) New Zealand pattern wheeled carrier 1943 (project2) |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
F60s LAAT Census Number from Chassis Number | Mark Towers | The Softskin Forum | 3 | 08-05-20 15:14 |
Falaise Gap: Hill 140 drama | Crewman | The Armour Forum | 32 | 03-08-05 07:02 |
Falaise Gap: Losses and successes of the Canadian 4th Armoured Division | Crewman | The Armour Forum | 26 | 28-05-05 02:01 |
Falaise Gap: Friendly fire (not from the air) | Crewman | The Armour Forum | 2 | 06-05-05 15:57 |
Falaise Gap: Air drops for the armoured divisions | Crewman | The Armour Forum | 0 | 27-03-05 17:23 |