MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Carrier Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-12-13, 23:04
Michael R. Michael R. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,163
Default MK-I* (Canada) production numbers change over to MK-II*

Milestone images from Ford Canada showing the production of the Universal Carrier, MK-I* from 12 January, 1943 through 28 January, 1944.
I believe the last serial number for a MK-I* series is about 24,005. The 24,000 milestone image shows the MK-II* was in production on 3rd March, 1944.


Milestone 12,000 image update (11 Dec 13) to show rail cars transporting assembled MK-I* hulls from Dominion Bridge Company, then at Sandwich, Ontario, a few miles from Ford Plant 4 (also known as "Ensite") where the Universal Carriers were assembled.

Does anyone know where the production numbers are taken from? Do they relate to the lower hull, upper hull or serial number?


References: Bill Gregg, Profile No. 4, Carrier, Universal MKI* (Canadian)
Michael Gladstone White, Faces of Ford, The Windsor Years.
Attached Thumbnails
MK-Istar hulls from Dominion Bridge assembly plant enroute to Ford Ensite factory.jpg   23,000 MK-Istar rolls out of Ford Canada.jpg   24000 MKII Ford, Windsor, Canada.jpg  

Last edited by Michael R.; 12-12-13 at 01:47.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-12-13, 23:53
Jordan Baker's Avatar
Jordan Baker Jordan Baker is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,146
Default

Check out the middle east water can rack on the back of the carrier in the first picture. I wonder if this carrier would look similar on the inside to that one from South Africa that was featured earlier this year
__________________
Jordan Baker
RHLI Museum,
Otter LRC
C15A-Wire3, 1944
Willys MB, 1942
10cwt Canadian trailer
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-12-13, 10:23
RichardT10829's Avatar
RichardT10829 RichardT10829 is offline
Richard Harrison
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cullercoats Newcastle Upon Tyne United Kingdom
Posts: 3,068
Default

1943, loads of carriers would have been sent out to North Africa, they had taken Tunisia back, and were preparing for operation Husky with a view to using Sicily as a stepping stone for the planned landings at Salerno (Op Avalanche) So it would make sense to have the ME stowage installed at factory level. I love the line of carrier hulls in that shot on what I assume is a conveyor belt.
__________________
is mos redintegro

__5th Div___46th Div__
1942 Ford Universal Carrier No.3 MkI*
Lower Hull No. 10131
War Department CT54508 (SOLD)
1944 Ford Universal Carrier MkII* (under restoration).
1944 Morris C8 radio body (under restoration).
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-12-13, 22:51
Roddy de Normann Roddy de Normann is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Redruth, Great Britain
Posts: 143
Default Mark-1star

Michael -

Did Ford (Canada) keep details the contracts issued to them ? I would be v interested to know to whom their vehicles went...

Roddy
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-12-13, 00:11
Michael R. Michael R. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,163
Default

Nigel Watson, in his publication: Universal Carriers, Volume One may be the best source for that information.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-12-13, 00:42
Bruce Parker (RIP) Bruce Parker (RIP) is offline
GM Fox I
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: SW Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,606
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardT10829 View Post
1943, loads of carriers would have been sent out to North Africa, they had taken Tunisia back, and were preparing for operation Husky with a view to using Sicily as a stepping stone for the planned landings at Salerno (Op Avalanche) So it would make sense to have the ME stowage installed at factory level. I love the line of carrier hulls in that shot on what I assume is a conveyor belt.
The conveyor belt looks like a train to me. What is also interesting is that those hulls look complete and shipped right from the factory that made them. All Ford had to do is put in the engine, rad, axle and wheels, yet they have the nerve to say they built them!!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-12-13, 02:15
Jordan Baker's Avatar
Jordan Baker Jordan Baker is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,146
Default

Bruce, interesting point about getting a complete hull minus drive systems. I guess it would be no different then your Fox. The bodies were all built by Hamilton Bridge in Hamilton then shipped by rail to the GM plant in Oshawa.

Sorry completely missed your original question for this post. I'm thinking the production #'s were based on the serial numbers. I have no proof, just my opinion.
__________________
Jordan Baker
RHLI Museum,
Otter LRC
C15A-Wire3, 1944
Willys MB, 1942
10cwt Canadian trailer
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-12-13, 02:31
rob love rob love is offline
carrier mech
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Shilo MB, the armpit of Canada
Posts: 7,587
Default

The complete hulls also through away the old theory that the powertrain was added to lower hulls, then the upper armour was added, resulting in the difference between the serial, hull and division plate numbers. One could almost wonder why the three different numbers.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-12-13, 02:38
Jordan Baker's Avatar
Jordan Baker Jordan Baker is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,146
Default

So I wonder what company was actually making the hulls up then for Ford? Wasn't it the Sunshine (or something similar) in Cambridge that made a lot of the sheet metal parts?
__________________
Jordan Baker
RHLI Museum,
Otter LRC
C15A-Wire3, 1944
Willys MB, 1942
10cwt Canadian trailer
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-12-13, 02:57
Michael R. Michael R. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,163
Default

Steel Plate: Dominion Foundries and Steel (DOFASCO, Hamilton, Ontario)
Heat treating: Dietrich Saw Company, Galt, Ontario. Actually Shurly-Dietrich-Atkins, hence SDA is found stamped into the armour plate. See foot note on post war flyer.
Punching: International Harvester Co. Hamilton, Ontario
Fabrication: Dominion Bridge Co., Sandwich, Ontario.
Assembly, testing, packing: Ford Motor Co. Plant 4, Windsor, Ontario

The stowage bins, dash panels, armour plate wireless battery boxes and assorted brackets were made by Sunshine-Waterloo Company Ltd in Waterloo, Ontario. Sunshine Harvester Works was an Australian implement company who partnered with Waterloo Manufacturing to form Sunshine-Waterloo. Sunshine made 2" & 3" mortar rounds, Mk-V land mines, PIAT rounds, No. 68 rifle grenades, CMP components ... the list goes on, including parts for the Mosquito bomber.
Attached Thumbnails
SDA GALT armour makers.jpg   SDA GALT catalogue.jpg   Crating the MK-Istar at Plant 4, FOMOCO, Windsor Ontario.jpg  

Last edited by Michael R.; 12-12-13 at 15:41.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-12-13, 15:39
Jordan Baker's Avatar
Jordan Baker Jordan Baker is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,146
Default

Very interesting. It's not all that different then today's production methods having a number of subcontracted out companies making the various components and Ford doing all the final assembly. I just love that Ford made very little of the carrier parts yet FMCO is stamped on almost eveything.

As for the doors....
http://images.ourontario.ca/waterloo/30174/data?n=102
__________________
Jordan Baker
RHLI Museum,
Otter LRC
C15A-Wire3, 1944
Willys MB, 1942
10cwt Canadian trailer
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-12-13, 18:41
Ben Ben is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 544
Default

The "sunshine co" part is interesting especially after Jordan's post. I have a spare lower suspension arm that has sunshine cast in raised letters, it's an LP part but the link with Australia makes sense, they must have cast suspension units in Australia as well as any other involvement. I always thought it an odd thing to have cast into a part on a military vehicle!!

Ben
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Vehicle Door Numbers Canada Bill Alexander The Softskin Forum 20 13-06-13 23:49
M3A1 Stuart welded hulls and production numbers mshackleton The Armour Forum 2 31-10-11 12:12
CMP Part Numbers: "Neutral Numbers" BCA Parts/Sources/Prices 9 11-07-11 03:23
Inglis production numbers of various Bren marks. Tony Smith WW2 Military History & Equipment 2 16-01-06 13:28
Australian production numbers Keith Webb The Softskin Forum 26 01-05-05 21:33


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 02:23.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016