MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Softskin Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 15-11-04, 08:25
Tony Smith's Avatar
Tony Smith Tony Smith is offline
No1, Mk 2** (I'm back!)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lithgow, NSW, Australia
Posts: 5,042
Default Re: The Portees

Quote:
Originally posted by David_Hayward
However the predecessor 2-pounder Portees were officially rated ab initio as '30 cwt.' trucks, and yet they were basically the CGT chassis and Oshawa Plant even allocated them the same 8440 Model Number, unlike the C8AX. The evidence suggests that the Portees were built as batches with CGTS. Given the lack of a parts book to tell the difference 'by the book', I extrapolated that the CGT was a 30-cwt. truck therefore. Going one step further, the FGT was as well.

I know we have been down this road before ....
David, WHICH portees were officially rated as 30cwt portees? The 2pdr portees built on a C30/F30 truck (GM model 8441) or the portees with the type 42 cab on a CGT chassis(GM Model 8440)? I can understand the C30/F30 portees being rated as 30cwt because they are a 30cwt truck (!), but does your official reference also relate to the CGT chassis portee?
When comparing the components on the Ford F-GT, F60 and F15A, we found that the F-GT had the chassis rails of the F15A, but the suspension and drivetrain of the F60. The C-GT based portee may have been rated at 15cwt and later upgraded to use a 30cwt truck to make use of the longer wheelbase and the ability to carry more stores.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg wh2-1epi-a010a(h280).jpg (12.1 KB, 799 views)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 03:00.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016