|  | 
|  | 
| 
			 
			#1  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			Fixed, Thx Brian
		 
				__________________ Charles Fitton Maryhill On., Canada too many carriers too many rovers not enough time. (and now a BSA...) (and now a Triumph TRW...) | 
| 
			 
			#2  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   
			
			52-32152 is an unusually high CFR number that I have not seen reported previously. I do not think it is related to any M38CDN ever owned by the late Ed Smith of Toronto, but any further clues to this jeep would be interesting.
		 | 
| 
			 
			#3  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			Online source: http://www.gvrdeu.org/M38%20Service%...umber%20DB.pdf Near the bottom of the referenced document (above weblink), there seems to be documented CAR numbers for M38CDN's up to 52-32068. That is 84 digits off the number in question. 
				__________________ 1953 M37 CDN 1953 M38A1 CDN 1967 M38A1 CDN2 | 
| 
			 
			#4  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   
			
			The c.a.r# for this m38cdn sounds quite leglt to me caus its only 2 numbers off mine..I put 52-32154 back on the road this spring..I'm told mine spent most of its life in London near the armory..id assume there's a good chance that's where 52-32152 originates from as well.
		 | 
| 
			 
			#5  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			Why didn't I catch that sooner...the CFR ( Best I can tell - ) is 52 - 30152. It has the inspectors' stamp, and some of the Jeep script is still on the front of the toolbox 
				__________________ Charles Fitton Maryhill On., Canada too many carriers too many rovers not enough time. (and now a BSA...) (and now a Triumph TRW...) | 
| 
			 
			#6  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   
			
			Charlie, I am unclear which CFR number you have: 52-32152 or 52-30152? ...Brian | 
| 
			 
			#7  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			I should have checked the paperwork.. 52 30105 according to the ownership. 
				__________________ Charles Fitton Maryhill On., Canada too many carriers too many rovers not enough time. (and now a BSA...) (and now a Triumph TRW...) | 
|  | 
| 
 | 
 |