MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Softskin Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-07-16, 10:46
Tony Smith's Avatar
Tony Smith Tony Smith is offline
No1, Mk 2** (I'm back!)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lithgow, NSW, Australia
Posts: 5,042
Default

Also, the 9.25-16 sizing seems to only be a uniquely Canadian idea. English-made tyres (WW2 production) for 5 degree bead seat are designated "9.00-16 for American Wheels".
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_5602.JPG (61.5 KB, 4 views)
__________________
You can help Keep Mapleleafup Up! See Here how you can help, and why you should!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-07-16, 11:05
Mike K's Avatar
Mike K Mike K is offline
Fan of Lord Nuffield
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Victoria, Australia
Posts: 5,882
Default sizes

I believe the 9-25 X 16 was also used on British Humbers , the 4X4 FFW PU and the Box ?

I tend to agree with Rick, the 9-25's had a lower profile ( nothing to do with brands ) and this low profile was a deliberate design spec. .
__________________
1940 cab 11 C8
1940 Morris-Commercial PU
1941 Morris-Commercial CS8
1940 Chev. 15cwt GS Van ( Aust.)
1942-45 Jeep salad
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-07-16, 12:51
mlombard mlombard is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Australia
Posts: 62
Default

Hi

This is interesting considering we were all feed the line over the years that the Allies won because they standardised everything and the Axis lost because they could stop inventing and re-inventing things. And yet here we are with two tyres which on the surface would seem too close to one another i.e 9.00 and 9.25 to bother with, yet they did it and produced both. Can't imagine in the heat of battle and looking for a spare tyre I'd have been too choosie!, not like I'm going to be stopped for a roadworthy as I'm rushing forward from El Amein or worst back from Tobruk!!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-07-16, 19:53
Richard Farrant's Avatar
Richard Farrant Richard Farrant is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Kent, England
Posts: 3,641
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Kelly View Post
I believe the 9-25 X 16 was also used on British Humbers , the 4X4 FFW PU and the Box ?

I tend to agree with Rick, the 9-25's had a lower profile ( nothing to do with brands ) and this low profile was a deliberate design spec. .
Hi Mike,
Quite correct, and the Humber Scout Car was also on Runflat 9.25-16 tyres. I have driven a Humber Scout on 9.00-16 and it is considerably more high geared due to the increased circumference. Especially awkward when trying to get it up on the neck of a low loader semi-trailer.
__________________
Richard

1943 Bedford QLD lorry - 1941 BSA WM20 m/cycle - 1943 Daimler Scout Car Mk2
Member of MVT, IMPS, MVG of NSW, KVE and AMVCS
KVE President & KVE News Editor
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-07-16, 22:18
mlombard mlombard is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Australia
Posts: 62
Default

Hi

So what was the reason for 9.25 x 16 versus 9.00 x 16 surely when they were trying to keep rubber use to a minimum one tyre would have been easier to produce, Was it something to do with weight carrying capacity, they were both off road tyres right, so there would have been no need for different performance characteristics surely. Was it something to do with the 'run flat' requirement on armoured cars etc.

regards

Matt
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-07-16, 05:52
lynx42 lynx42 is offline
Rick Cove
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Paynesville, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 1,866
Default Another vehicle with 9:25 x 16 tyres

It is amazing what turns up sometimes. This is a copy of a photo in an article in the latest Classic Military Vehicle magazine about the Morris Light Reconnaissance car.

It is the contract card for an order for Mark 1 cars and shows the tyre size required. - Tyres. 9.25-16R.F.

img141.jpg

So here we have another vehicle which used the 9.25 x 16 tyre.

Regards Rick.
__________________
1916 Albion A10
1942 White Scoutcar
1940 Chev Staff Car
1940 F30S Cab11
1940 Chev WA LRDG "Te Hai"
1941 F60L Cab12
1943 Ford Lynx
1942 Bren Gun Carrier VR no.2250
Humber FV1601A
Saracen Mk1(?)
25pdr. 1940 Weir No.266
25pdr. Australian Short No.185 (?)
KVE Member.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 22-07-16, 04:16
mlombard mlombard is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Australia
Posts: 62
Default

Hi Rick

Still begs the question Why, what was so different in the technical specs between a 9.00 and 9.25 tyre.

Matt
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-12-17, 18:53
gazzaw gazzaw is offline
Gary
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 41
Default Tyre buyer

Whilst whetting me appetite on the tyre history does any of you knowledgeable people have any idea or intel on a source for 10.5 x 16s as will be needing a set soon

Regards

Gary
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
9.00-16 Tyres...... Monkey Man Post-war Military Vehicles 3 07-03-13 12:20
12:00-20 tyres Harry Moon The Restoration Forum 6 14-12-12 06:25
10.00 X 20 tyres Robin Craig Post-war Military Vehicles 5 12-11-12 14:47
900 x 13 Tyres Lynx45 The Gun Park 15 07-09-07 03:32
Want some tyres?? Bill Murray The Softskin Forum 10 13-02-06 10:58


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 21:35.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016