MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Carrier Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-09-16, 04:07
Jon Bradshaw's Avatar
Jon Bradshaw Jon Bradshaw is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Prince Edward County, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 270
Default For comparison.

Here are the pics of my tank, it has been painted since these were taken but only primer grey. Turret spins easily and seems well balanced. Will make a gun in the next year. I have had it out driving a few times and seem to have adjusted all the steering and braking brakes so it handles well. A bit scary on pavement as it likes to skid sideways on turns. Driving the chassis in reverse does not seem to hurt the steering system. It does seem more responsive in reverse but only slightly.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 20151117_161311.jpg (135.4 KB, 14 views)
File Type: jpg 20151117_162743.jpg (150.1 KB, 13 views)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-09-16, 09:48
eddy8men eddy8men is offline
AKA Rick Wedlock
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: manchester
Posts: 715
Default

that's a really nice job. going to look great when it's finished
__________________
_______________________
1941 mk1 mortar Carrier
1941 Mk1* Carrier
1942 Mk1* Carrier
1943 T16 Carrier
1945 Mk3 Dingo
1941 Mk3 Covenanter
1941 Mk4 Churchill AVRE (now sold)
1944 Mk6 Cromwell (now sold)
1952 Mk3 Centurion
1952 ARV Centurion
1952 ARV Centurion
1953 Mk3 Centurion (breaking)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-09-16, 13:17
Petr Brezina Petr Brezina is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 547
Default

Great progress, very nice!
__________________
UCw Mk.III
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-09-16, 13:36
Hanno Spoelstra's Avatar
Hanno Spoelstra Hanno Spoelstra is offline
MLU Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 14,868
Default

Jon,

Great work on the replica!

Some pictures of the sole remaining "Dutchman" for your reference.

HTH,
Hanno

P1160217_resized.jpg P1160227_resized.jpg P1160238_resized.jpg P1160252_resized.jpg P1160266_resized.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-09-16, 06:02
Jon Bradshaw's Avatar
Jon Bradshaw Jon Bradshaw is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Prince Edward County, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 270
Default Thanks guys!

As you guys can see, the biggest discrepancy is the rear end, I left part of the front glacis of the carrier with the tow eyes for practical purposes. Taking that much out of the carrier to make it shorter seemed excessive and securing it for transport is much easier with those to chain to.

The pic Hanno put up of the view port is my next big hurdle. I need to make those from scratch, unless someone has a spare they might part with? Once I have one I can copy them, fairly closely.... Otherwise I will just use the pic and make something similar looking. Much as I have done thus far.

Thanks for the encouragement.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 23-09-16, 06:40
Jon Bradshaw's Avatar
Jon Bradshaw Jon Bradshaw is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Prince Edward County, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 270
Default Got this photo thing sorted now.

So after reading and trying a few things on how to resize photos I have finally got this sorted. I will post a series of photos showing how I have assembled this to this point. The track jack I made from a modified M113 track jack, it works well, especially with a cordless impact on it.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg resized driveline and rad.jpg (176.2 KB, 13 views)
File Type: jpg resized driver area.jpg (241.4 KB, 12 views)
File Type: jpg resized engine bay.jpg (132.4 KB, 10 views)
File Type: jpg resized pic1.jpg (190.9 KB, 11 views)
File Type: jpg resized track jack.jpg (122.1 KB, 14 views)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 23-09-16, 08:36
Lynn Eades Lynn Eades is offline
Bluebell
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand
Posts: 5,541
Default

Well done Jon.
Sometimes the restriction of restoration can be annoying and I feel it would be refreshing to have the freedom of choice, to do what ever I want.
I am wondering how you tie it down? These comments will either help you or educate me.
Over here the guys seem to tie down the suspension(forward and aft through the bogie wheels) rather than tying down the hull, because the carrier moves too much when they are tied at the tow/ lift eyes.
The eyes might be o.k. to use when the pull is in the horizontal plane, but not pulling downwards.
Maybe you haven't carted it anywhere yet?
__________________
Bluebell

Carrier Armoured O.P. No1 Mk3 W. T84991
Carrier Bren No2.Mk.I. NewZealand Railways. NZR.6.
Dodge WC55. 37mm Gun Motor Carriage M6
Jeep Mb #135668
So many questions....
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 23-09-16, 21:15
maple_leaf_eh maple_leaf_eh is offline
Terry Warner
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Shouting at clouds
Posts: 3,152
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon Bradshaw View Post
...

The pic Hanno put up of the view port is my next big hurdle. I need to make those from scratch, unless someone has a spare they might part with? Once I have one I can copy them, fairly closely.... Otherwise I will just use the pic and make something similar looking. Much as I have done thus far.

Thanks for the encouragement.
There is a shop in central US that has made a replica Panzer III, initially with five roadwheels then they replaced them with six roadwheels. I saw their work on a FaceBook group, Panzer Fabrik or something close.

Their techniques for fabricating realistic looking thick armour are worth copying. As I recall, the plate is 1/4" mild steel and the visible edge of the supposedly thick plate is 1/4" bar stock welded one on top of another, and ground smooth. Their keystone finger joints on the frontal armour of the Panzer are very convincing.
__________________
Terry Warner

- 74-????? M151A2
- 70-08876 M38A1
- 53-71233 M100CDN trailer

Beware! The Green Disease walks among us!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 24-09-16, 01:44
Jon Bradshaw's Avatar
Jon Bradshaw Jon Bradshaw is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Prince Edward County, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 270
Default Reply

Lynn- To tie it down I have made the appropriate eyes on the front and use the rear towing eyes. I have carted it around the city and several hours on the highway with no issues of it moving. I use several chains in a double "X" on the back and then a single chain through both up front with both tightened down heavily by chain tighteners. I use both the "lever" type and the "screw" type to get maximum tension on the load. Both front and rear chains are on about a 45 degree angle so keep it pulled both down and back. I did have it lift a bit in the front when I first started (while braking) so that's why I pull down hard on it. My best thought on the difference would be that the Universals having only three wheels a side, probably makes them more unstable and prone to bouncing/ lifting when braking....

Maple_leaf_eh- I looked at the armour and it appears to be very thin on the originals so I didn't worry much about it. The idea of doubling the edge did occur to me but I didn't. The sides of the tank cover the edge of the top armour so the only place you see a side edge is the front down low. All other edges are top down so less obvious from a distance.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
T16 Project begun... ajmac The Carrier Forum 4 22-06-10 21:31
Search and seizure has begun...RED ALERT Alex Blair (RIP) The Sergeants' Mess 12 02-12-07 04:35


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 18:35.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016