MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Armour Forum

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #6  
Old 30-12-04, 14:50
servicepub (RIP)'s Avatar
servicepub (RIP) servicepub (RIP) is offline
RIP
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 1,734
Default Crusader tower

According to the CMHQ Reports (#141 - Situation of the Canadian Military Forces Overseas. Progress in Equipment Jan-Dec 44.)

42. The question of a tower for the gun received considerable attention. Within 21 Army Group the policy was adopted of fitting all tanks with 17-pr towing books for emergency use (ibid: B.G.S., C.M.H.Q. to D.Q.M.Q., C.M.H.Q., 21 Dec 43). In March 1944 it was intended to use entirely wheeled vehicles as standard towers, probably the American 2½-ton 6 x 6 lorry (ibid. Chief of Staff, C.M.H.Q. to Under-Secretary of State, War Office, 4 Mar 44). These were found not to be available, and various vehicles were used. 6 Cdn A Tk Regt of 2 Cdn Corps used modified Ram tanks specially for this purpose. In Italy the anti-tank regiments of 5 Cdn Armd Div and 1 Cdn Corps used modified Crusader tanks. Other units used the Field Artillery Tractor (C.M.H.Q. file 1/SP 17-Pdr/1: S.D. (E), C.M.H.Q. to S.D. (M.T.), C.M.H.Q., 8 Jun 44; Cdn Ops in N.W.E. series 6, p.4). Half-Tracks were also used.

43. Besides the towed 17-pr anti-tank gun, two types of self-propelled 17-pr anti-tank gun were introduced during the year. In April 3-in M 10 self-propelled equipments were being modified to mount 17-pr guns (C.M.H.Q. file 1/SP 17-Pdr/1: Chief of Staff, C.M.H.Q. to H.Q. First Cdn Army, 21 Apr 44). In June twenty-four of these were issued to 5 Cdn A Tk Regt of 4 Cdn Armd Div in place of the 3-in M 10 equipment which had been held as an interim measure (C.M.H.Q. file 13/Equip States/1/7: Equipment State, Cdn Army in U.K. as at 30 Jun 44). At the end of June three more were issued to Canadian Reinforcement Units for training (C.M.H.Q. file 1/SP 17-Pdr/1: Director Royal Artillery, War Office to C.M.H.Q., 29 Jun 44; D.C.G.S., C.M.H.Q. to D.Q.M.G., C.M.H.Q., 13 Jul 44). In August the policy was adopted of equipping infantry divisional anti-tank regiments on the following basis (ibid: Extract from Eqpt Policy Memorandum, First Cdn Army, 3 Aug 44, S.D., First Cdn Army to C.M.H.Q. 6 Aug 44):
1 tp in each bty with 6-pr towed - total 16 guns.
1 tp in each bty with 17-pr towed - total 16 guns.
1 tp in each bty with 17-pr Valentine SP - total 16 guns.
None of the Valentine self-propelled equipments had been received by the Canadian forces at the end of November.

44. The 17-pr anti-tank gun proved very effective in operations. But there was a definite preference for self-propelled guns. The towed gun was hard to move and a tracked tower was often necessary. The Ram Tower was reported to be the best available, but was noisy and bulky (Cdn Ops in Med Area, series 25, p. 3; series 28, p. 2; Cdn Ops in N.W.E., series 12, pp 5-6). 6 Cdn A Tk Regt were to change to Crusader towers.


I will soon publish "Tools of the Trade" which will be a compilation of the four war-time CMHQ reports on equipment. This book will run 128 pages and will include 156 photos.
__________________
Those who live by the sword will be shot by those of us who have progressed.
- M38A1, 67-07800, ex LETE
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 08:02.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016