![]() |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Tony, excellent points, and this is where I apologise for my seeming confusion. Also correction about allowing the reference to 2-pdr. Portees being fudged with the F30/C30 30-cwt. 134" w.b. Portees. I am glad to be corrected but for consideration the evidence as regards the FAT 4 x 4 capacity rating I put forward is:
1. Richard has indicated: Quote:
3. British contract S/M 2028 was a mixed one for Chevrolet Gun Tractors, and also 2-pounder Portees, equivalent of the MCC C8/MG Portees. British survivors were as you know converted to either 17-pdr. Tractors or GS Trucks. These were officially classed by the BRITISH as 'LORRY 30 CWT. 4 X 4 A/TK PORTEE'. These used the C-GT chassis of course and in theory were therefore on the face of it of 30-cwt. capacity and not 3-tons. The above would seem to suggest that the F-GT and C-GT had a 30-cwt. capacity. However, I am going to go by new evidence I just found: 1. DND Specification No. O.A. 85 dated 26-11-41 refers to the : '60441-M-POTE#1' body on 'Portee Anti-tank [on FAT Chassis with DND Chassis Winch]' as well as the previously mentioned: 2. DND Specification as before: '60441-M...Field Artillery Tractor - 101" W.B.'. 3. As Bart Vanderveen confirmed in WHEELS & TRACKS # 33: 'Axles, drive line and engine were the same as on the 3-ton 4 x 4 CMP vehicles....'. The DND therefore quote in two places the FAT chassis as having a 60-cwt. classification. Others may disagree, and the very welcome comments by Richard about double-skinned chassis rails are noted, but I now suggest that the DND rating is correct. There is no confusion as regards the British order 'LORRY 3 TON 4 x 4 A/TK PORTEE' C60L 6-pdr. Portees to S/M 2613, which were rebuilt of course as 3-tonner GS trucks. Last edited by David_Hayward (RIP); 10-01-05 at 23:11. |
|
|