MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Softskin Forum

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #19  
Old 10-01-05, 16:00
David_Hayward (RIP)'s Avatar
David_Hayward (RIP) David_Hayward (RIP) is offline
former Resident Historian
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The New Forest, England
Posts: 3,841
Default Good points!

Tony, excellent points, and this is where I apologise for my seeming confusion. Also correction about allowing the reference to 2-pdr. Portees being fudged with the F30/C30 30-cwt. 134" w.b. Portees. I am glad to be corrected but for consideration the evidence as regards the FAT 4 x 4 capacity rating I put forward is:

1. Richard has indicated:
Quote:
The difference between unladen and laden weight on an early CMP FAT is 27 cwt and on a Morris C8 FAT it is 30 cwt.
2. War Department Specification 36 of December 1935 as amended up to spring 1939 refers to 15-cwt. GS 4-wheel Trucks, conversions of Anti-tank Tractor bodies for these and also Cavalry Portee bodies. The British Gun Tractors built to Spec. 36 were either to be 15-cwt. chassis or 30-cwt. 6 x 4 although 3-ton 6 x 4 chassis are also covered, with GS etc. bodies. The 30-cwt. Ford-Scammell and Chevrolet-Scammell FATs of 1938 were never proceeded with into production, and the Canadian FATs were intended as a direct replacement thereof. It might be argued that the 4 x 4 FATs were also be intended to be '30-cwt.' capacity although there is no documentary evidence so far to confirm either way.
3. British contract S/M 2028 was a mixed one for Chevrolet Gun Tractors, and also 2-pounder Portees, equivalent of the MCC C8/MG Portees. British survivors were as you know converted to either 17-pdr. Tractors or GS Trucks. These were officially classed by the BRITISH as 'LORRY 30 CWT. 4 X 4 A/TK PORTEE'. These used the C-GT chassis of course and in theory were therefore on the face of it of 30-cwt. capacity and not 3-tons.

The above would seem to suggest that the F-GT and C-GT had a 30-cwt. capacity. However, I am going to go by new evidence I just found:

1. DND Specification No. O.A. 85 dated 26-11-41 refers to the :
'60441-M-POTE#1' body on 'Portee Anti-tank [on FAT Chassis with DND Chassis Winch]' as well as the previously mentioned:
2. DND Specification as before:
'60441-M...Field Artillery Tractor - 101" W.B.'.
3. As Bart Vanderveen confirmed in WHEELS & TRACKS # 33: 'Axles, drive line and engine were the same as on the 3-ton 4 x 4 CMP vehicles....'.

The DND therefore quote in two places the FAT chassis as having a 60-cwt. classification. Others may disagree, and the very welcome comments by Richard about double-skinned chassis rails are noted, but I now suggest that the DND rating is correct.

There is no confusion as regards the British order 'LORRY 3 TON 4 x 4 A/TK PORTEE' C60L 6-pdr. Portees to S/M 2613, which were rebuilt of course as 3-tonner GS trucks.

Last edited by David_Hayward (RIP); 10-01-05 at 23:11.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 01:58.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016