Smle

[Bruce Parker (RIP)]

Originally Posted by Mike Cecil

I agree with Bruce et al: SMLE does indeed stand for 'Short, Magazine, Lee-Enfield'.

I seem to remember that 'magazine' denotes fed from not only a magazine, but one that is detachable.

Lee is named for James Paris Lee, the designer of this particular bolt action, and Enfield after the Royal Small Arms Factory staff for improvements to Lee's design to make it what it is: a solid, fast, rear-locking, bolt action.

I've had both a No4 Mk1* T and a No.1 Mk3* HT with the Patt 1918 'scope, and thought the latter was a far far nicer rifle to shoot.

Never was able to procure a No.3 Mk.1 (T), but shot with one a couple of times: another nice rifle, but the SMLE was my favourite of the scoped .303 rifles.

However, the nicest .303 I ever owned and fired was a 1915 Enfield manufactured No.1 Mk3*. It had a walnut stock that was much slimmer with much more 'shape' than the Australian coachwood-stocked rifles I had.

My 'alfpenny's wurf...

Mike

Queensland Maple on the 1915 Lithgow...very nice and more than a match for British walnut (unless it's tiger stripe walnut of course...check it out on this 1899 Lee Enfield Carbine and tell me it's not the most fetching).

But the best shooter (though one who's looks need to grow on you) has to be a Canadian Model 1910 Ross. Once you get over that whole "the bolt could blow back in your face" thing it's a dream to shoot. Pull the trigger, settle in, aim, adjust and 'plink', right in the bulls eye.

[Mike Cecil]

"Queensland Maple on the 1915 Lithgow...very nice and more than a match for British walnut"

I agree Bruce, Qld Maple does look nice, but it doesn't stand up to the strain of use: a very soft wood that seems to gets dings and dents just looking at it.

Mike

[motto]

The Enfield part of the title SMLE in fact refers to the form of rifling used so as to differentiate these rifles from those built with the former (read obsolete) Metford rifled barrels. Metford rifling was found to be unsatisfactory for use with smokeless propellant. It was adequate for black powder cartridges but eroded rapidly with usage of cordite ammunition.

David

[Tim Lovelock]

Thank you all, my misconception is truly corrected,
'Ask a question, and you are a fool for a moment, don't ask and you are a fool forever'.
Thank you all again 😃

[Mike Cecil]

Dave, you are dead right:

'On 11 Nov 1895, the new rifle was approved as the Magazine Lee-Enfield Mk1, utilizing the new rifling named in the title. The only difference to the Mark 2* Lee-Metford was in the form of the rifling ... '

Mike

[Bruce Parker (RIP)]

Originally Posted by Mike Cecil

Dave, you are dead right:

'On 11 Nov 1895, the new rifle was approved as the Magazine Lee-Enfield Mk1, utilizing the new rifling named in the title. The only difference to the Mark 2* Lee-Metford was in the form of the rifling ... '

Mike

Ah, you must mean this one:

[motto]

Hi Mike
It would appear that you also have a copy of Ian Skennerton's book 'The British Service Lee'. It is a comprehensive source of information on these rifles.

Dave

[Mike Cecil]

Of course! No self-respecting military history library would be without one, Dave, and why on earth are you up pounding the keyboard at 02:50 hours??? Can't sleep, mate, or just home from a night on the town ??

Best regards

Mike