MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Softskin Forum

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #16  
Old 17-01-05, 02:40
Tony Smith's Avatar
Tony Smith Tony Smith is offline
No1, Mk 2** (I'm back!)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lithgow, NSW, Australia
Posts: 5,042
Default Re: Thanks Tony!

Quote:
Originally posted by David_Hayward
Please shoot me down on this one but I think the evidence suggests that in 1939 Windsor's team compared both GMC and M-H 4 x 4 chassis, and the Ford men naturally though that the M-H setup should be used. Probably with the Chevrolet rear axle located in front....Dr Gregg's photo of the F15A pilot truck had Chev axles and most likely a M-H transfer case. There is evidence that GM of Canada had used M-H components since at least 1935. However, the basic M-H design had its shortcomings as Tony has highlighted, and although we know the DND did indeed use M-H-converted MCPs, with Thornton and M-H/Timken components, it was GM McKinnons that produced the original 4 x 4 components under licence from Timken, and Fords subsequently dual-sourced by producing their own designs based thereon in their axle plant. The new design had the options of dual-speeds [if required] and disengement of front axle. As well as right-side output.

However, when reference is made to the use of M-H layouts when the first 4 x 4 CMP trucks were conceived, I believe that I can now prove this was in fact totally correct!
David, I didn't suggest that there was any shortcomings in the M-H system, quite the opposite! It was very well designed and the concept is still being produced today. The system was designed to be used on 1 or 1 1/2 ton trucks with 85hp engines. The issue with M-H components in the prototype CMP's was their marginal weight ratings for that application. They could have gotten away with it if the CMP was only ever going to be a 15cwt, but for the sake of standardisation, a heavier case was required for the FAT and 60cwt's. I don't believe the Ford produced cases are a new design, as I mentioned many of the parts share Ford and Chev numbers and are interchangeable. It was just a case of two (at least!) manufacturers of the components. Who originally conceived or licenced the design, I'll leave for you to discover.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg truck_awd.jpg (15.6 KB, 484 views)
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 19:09.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016