MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Armour Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-10-18, 07:25
Malcolm Towrie Malcolm Towrie is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Whitby, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 306
Default

Darryl, i certainly agree 1/2" tubing is way overkill for the clutch line. It's a mystery why the OEM spec'd it. I suspect a massive typo.

I don't know what version of the parts manual you have, but mine shows that the original spec was lengths of 1/2" flexible hydraulic line! That's even weirder.

As someone mentioned above (maybe you), using 1/2" tubing just makes bleeding much more difficult as you won't get enough fluid velocity to carry air bubbles along the tubing.

So that's a 1/2" UNF thread on the m/c outlet. That's why I couldn't get the as-found 1/4" NPT fitting to seal!

Malcolm
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-10-18, 08:50
Lynn Eades Lynn Eades is offline
Bluebell
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand
Posts: 5,541
Default

So guys with a 1/2" UNF thread it will require a banjo fitting and a couple of copper washers.
__________________
Bluebell

Carrier Armoured O.P. No1 Mk3 W. T84991
Carrier Bren No2.Mk.I. NewZealand Railways. NZR.6.
Dodge WC55. 37mm Gun Motor Carriage M6
Jeep Mb #135668
So many questions....
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-10-18, 10:00
Big D Big D is offline
Darryl
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Dunedin, New Zealand
Posts: 661
Default

Hi Lynn

Yes, that’s what I’m going to use. It seems there was no fitting or combination of fittings to adapt the 1/2” or even 3/8” tube to the 1/2” connection on the master cylinder, thus their recommendation for 5/16” tube.
__________________
Cheers,

Darryl Lennane

1943 Willys MB
1941 Willys MBT Trailer
1941 Australian LP2A Machine Gun Carrier
1943 White M3A1AOP Scout Car
1944 Ford M8 Armoured Car
1945 Ford M20 Armoured Car
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-10-18, 16:58
David Herbert David Herbert is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Ayrshire, Scotland - previously Suffolk
Posts: 565
Default

I wonder if the 1/2" tube was used so that air bubbles could move along the tube by themselves to the highest point, to be removed at the bleed point by the bulkhead. They might have had the same trouble as you guys in trying to push bubbles to the bleed on the slave cylinder. It is hard to see how this system is much different to an ordinary brake system but there is obviously some reason that they went for 1/2" unless as Malcolm suggested it is actually a mistake by the designer - seems unlikely though. The larger pipe would have made any problems due to heat worse as there would be more fluid expanding by the same % so more to accomodate.
I think I would use 5/16" tube and follow the original route and include the extra bleed point as that aught to be where air would collect by itself.

David
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ferocious brakes on our M8 Greyhound Malcolm Towrie The Armour Forum 10 27-09-18 03:39
M8 Greyhound Brake Fluid? Malcolm Towrie The Armour Forum 5 27-09-18 03:32
RCD's M8 Greyhound John McGillivray The Armour Forum 14 03-02-12 16:08
M8 Greyhound in Australia. Ryan The Armour Forum 15 14-09-09 14:32
F8 clutch - help! david moore The Restoration Forum 7 16-01-08 06:17


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 04:07.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016